[itzamia]

Although I had a uterine fibroid embolization done 8 years ago, the fibroids kept growing. 6 months ago, my Dr. could not perform a pap due to these growths. She recommended a hysterectomy but I am near menopause and who wants unnecessary surgery? However, the big concern now is that since a pap can no longer be performed, cancer may go undetected. Do you think my insurance company would consider this a pre-existing condition, or will they be more concerned that since a pap cannot be performed, a detriment of greater magnitude may occur in the future (cancer) ? Thank you for your time. L Sadler

[JudyKayTee]

I don't understand the connection between menopause and a tumor.

I had a complete hysterectomy some years ago at the recommendation of my Physician because of a tumor - he did not trust the lab results. It WAS fibroid but I was not willing to take the chance.

My insurance company respected his opinion.

What is your question about pre-existing conditions? Did you get this diagnosis and then change companies?

[itzamia]

My doctor advised years ago that after menopause, the fibroids should begin to shrink, although very slowly (thus the connection between the tumor and menopause). I felt surgery may be unnecessary since they will eventually shrink, after menopause, but now since Dr cannot perform pap, I am worried I should get hysterectomy. I am afraid insurance company will deny covering this since I would be the one electing to have it done. I signed up with my current insurance carrier a year ago, and I had to list that I had the fibroid embolization done in 2003 (hence my thinking that insurance carrier would consider this a pre-existing condition). Thanks for your advice JudyKayTee!

[JudyKayTee]

It's going to depend on how your Doctor words it. Now I understand.

I don't think I'd wait until menopause, see if the tumors shrink, then try to determine if they are or are not malignant.

I understand your concerns, though. I just don't think I could/would wait.