Although I had a uterine fibroid embolization done 8 years ago, the fibroids kept growing. 6 months ago, my Dr. could not perform a pap due to these growths. She recommended a hysterectomy but I am near menopause and who wants unnecessary surgery? However, the big concern now is that since a pap can no longer be performed, cancer may go undetected. Do you think my insurance company would consider this a pre-existing condition, or will they be more concerned that since a pap cannot be performed, a detriment of greater magnitude may occur in the future (cancer) ? Thank you for your time. L Sadler

I don't understand the connection between menopause and a tumor.

I had a complete hysterectomy some years ago at the recommendation of my Physician because of a tumor - he did not trust the lab results. It WAS fibroid but I was not willing to take the chance.

My insurance company respected his opinion.

What is your question about pre-existing conditions? Did you get this diagnosis and then change companies?

My doctor advised years ago that after menopause, the fibroids should begin to shrink, although very slowly (thus the connection between the tumor and menopause). I felt surgery may be unnecessary since they will eventually shrink, after menopause, but now since Dr cannot perform pap, I am worried I should get hysterectomy. I am afraid insurance company will deny covering this since I would be the one electing to have it done. I signed up with my current insurance carrier a year ago, and I had to list that I had the fibroid embolization done in 2003 (hence my thinking that insurance carrier would consider this a pre-existing condition). Thanks for your advice JudyKayTee!

It's going to depend on how your Doctor words it. Now I understand.

I don't think I'd wait until menopause, see if the tumors shrink, then try to determine if they are or are not malignant.

I understand your concerns, though. I just don't think I could/would wait.