Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #41

    Sep 8, 2012, 05:08 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    I think if we all practice our religion and family values at home then you should NOT be telling your neighbors how to practice their religion and family values. Since its legal in America to have an abortion in the first trimester, its between you, your god(?) and your doctor, so just butt out of my business.
    I'm not butting in or dictating your beliefs and values. There is a tremendous and obvious difference between dictating and persuading. Dictating is mandating the church buy contraceptives against beliefs in clear violation of first amendment rights. Dictating is banning sodas and Happy Meals, perfectly legal items. Persuading is convincing you to give the child a chance.

    See how easy that was?
    ScottGem's Avatar
    ScottGem Posts: 64,966, Reputation: 6056
    Computer Expert and Renaissance Man
     
    #42

    Sep 8, 2012, 05:15 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    I'm not butting in or dictating your beliefs and values. There is a tremendous and obvious difference between dictating and persuading. Dictating is mandating the church buy contraceptives against beliefs in clear violation of first amendment rights. Dictating is banning sodas and Happy Meals, perfectly legal items. Persuading is convincing you to give the child a chance.

    See how easy that was?
    YOU may not be doing that. But it is clear that the anti-abortion lobby would like to make any abortion illegal. By advocating laws that would remove the right to choose they are trying to impose their religious beliefs on people who believe differently.

    If you want to offer reasons a fetus is a child or when it becomes a child. If you want to offer reasons you feel current laws do not "give a child a chance", feel free to do so. Just as I feel free to explain why I believe in giving the mother the choice. Lets try to keep this from personalities.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #43

    Sep 8, 2012, 05:37 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by ScottGem View Post
    YOU may not be doing that. But it is clear that the anti-abortion lobby would like to make any abortion illegal. By advocating laws that would remove the right to choose they are trying to impose their religious beliefs on people who believe differently.
    And that's different from what this administration has already done by executive fiat with the contraception mandate how? This is why all this outrage over the "anti-choice" crowd as you label them doesn't move me. The left LOVES restricting choice and dictating beliefs, and they don't even bother with legalities now, they just decree it so.

    If you want to offer reasons a fetus is a child or when it becomes a child. If you want to offer reasons you feel current laws do not "give a child a chance", feel free to do so. Just as I feel free to explain why I believe in giving the mother the choice.
    In other words, feel free to discuss on your terms?


    Lets try to keep this from personalities.
    Comment here would be pointless.
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #44

    Sep 8, 2012, 05:46 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    Dictating is mandating the church buy contraceptives against beliefs in clear violation of first amendment rights.
    Once again the church is not forced to buy any contraceptives. In any case people still have the choice not to use them, I would assume that if all church attendees were like yourself then there would be no demand for contraceptives so nothing changes. If you ban abortions then you remove the choice and dictate what people can or cannot do.
    Fr_Chuck's Avatar
    Fr_Chuck Posts: 81,301, Reputation: 7692
    Expert
     
    #45

    Sep 8, 2012, 05:49 AM
    But why should my tax money pay for someone's abortion,

    if it is legal, let them write a check and pay for it. Let the babies daddy write the check. Why should I, who believe they are a sin and against moral values, have to have my tax money pay for someone abortion.

    Thus my issue, it is a women's choice, I may not like it or agree, but that is the current law. So she should have to chose to pay for it.

    I would like to chose to drive a Lincoln , but I can't get other people to pay for it, so I drive a Honda.

    An abortion is not a "right" given under the Constitution, it is not a life saving medical procedure, it is as noted, a "choice" so with all choices in life, the person chosing it, should have to pay for it.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #46

    Sep 8, 2012, 05:52 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    Once again the church is not forced to buy any contraceptives. In any case people still have the choice not to use them, I would assume that if all church attendees were like yourself then there would be no demand for contraceptives so nothing changes. If you ban abortions then you remove the choice and dictate what people can or cannot do.
    You can't any further from the truth than your first sentence.
    ScottGem's Avatar
    ScottGem Posts: 64,966, Reputation: 6056
    Computer Expert and Renaissance Man
     
    #47

    Sep 8, 2012, 05:55 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    In other words, feel free to discuss on your terms?
    .
    The only "terms" to this discussion is the rules of this site that prevent personal attacks. As long as posts do not involve such they will be allowed. Nothing has been removed from this thread other than personal attacks.
    ScottGem's Avatar
    ScottGem Posts: 64,966, Reputation: 6056
    Computer Expert and Renaissance Man
     
    #48

    Sep 8, 2012, 05:56 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    You can't any further from the truth than your first sentence.
    I'm not arguing with this, I'm just asking both of you to provide proof.
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #49

    Sep 8, 2012, 05:58 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Fr_Chuck View Post
    But why should my tax money pay for someones abortion,
    I agree with you here. Keep it legal but it should be part of the individual's insurance plan. Unfortunately I understand people don't have that much choice in insurers at times.
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #50

    Sep 8, 2012, 06:01 AM
    Hello again,

    Yeah, it's a double post... I assume you're NOT answering, because you DON'T have an answer... Yeah... We already KNEW that.

    Personally, I'm not here to discuss Obama's views on abortion.. I'm interested in YOURS.

    Tell me how you'd MAKE your daughter bear her rapists kid... What if it was your WIFE? You'd take the rapists child in?? You'd raise him? Nahhh, you wouldn't.. Who're you trying to kid?

    excon
    ____________
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #51

    Sep 8, 2012, 07:02 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by ScottGem View Post
    I'm not arguing with this, I'm just asking both of you to provide proof.
    The only his statement can be true is if the government redefines the church.
    Synnen's Avatar
    Synnen Posts: 7,927, Reputation: 2443
    Expert
     
    #52

    Sep 8, 2012, 07:14 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Fr_Chuck View Post
    But why should my tax money pay for someones abortion,

    if it is legal, let them write a check and pay for it. let the babies daddy write the check. why should I, who beleive they are a sin and and against moral values, have to have my tax money pay for someone abortion.

    Thus my issue, it is a womens choice, I may not like it or agree, but that is the current law. so she should have to chose to pay for it.

    I would like to chose to drive a Lincoln , but i can't get other people to pay for it, so I drive a Honda.

    An abortion is not a "right" given under the Constitution, it is not a life saving medical procedure, it is as noted, a "choice" so with all choices in life, the person chosing it, should have to pay for it.

    But it IS a life-saving procedure sometimes. Shouldn't it be covered for those women? Or does the life of the fetus trump their own right to life? And sometimes the choice is between raising your rapist's child and keeping your sanity--what kind of choice is THAT? And pretty please do not bring up adoption as a "better" choice than abortion. Adoption has it's own scars and battles, and being designated as "at least you didn't get an abortion" is one of the most common comments I got when I chose adoption. I honestly think I'd have fewer scars had I chose an abortion, but I knew that wasn't the right choice for me.

    Honestly, MOST women aren't sitting there thinking "thank god I can get an abortion any time I want to, because that means I can just have as much sex as I want and not worry about it!" Every single woman I know that chose abortion thought long and hard about it, and still required counseling afterwards. It's not something that you just go "oops! I'm pregnant! Guess I'd better just pop on down and get an abortion!"---but that's the way it gets presented over and over by the anti-choice crowd. I know 5 women who have had abortions. For 2, it was a serious medical reason--the fetus was not going to live in either case. For 1, it was because she'd been raped by her uncle. For 1, it was that she was in an emotional state that she felt was impossible to sustain a pregnancy. And for the final 1, she already had 3 kids, could not afford another, and knew that when it came down to it she couldn't give her child that she carried to term to someone else. It literally came down to that her other children would suffer if she had another child.

    4 of the 5 women were using birth control. The 5th--the one that was raped--was a virgin and hadn't had a need for birth control at that point in her life.

    I really think that men have no concept of all of the changes that happen during pregnancy, and that while pregnancy can be truly wonderful and a blessing in every way---it can also be a horrible nightmare that a woman can't walk away from like a man can. You can't distance yourself, you can't ignore it, and you certainly can't just decide it's not yours and have nothing more to do with it. Pregnancy changes you in EVERY way. Some women simply are not up for that change, or cannot bear to go through an entire pregnancy for a child that will not (or is not already) live.

    We had to have the discussion before my 20 week ultrasound on what we would do if the child had serious genetic issues or problems that would cause the child's life to be horrible. And this was with a longed-for and wanted pregnancy! I don't know what we would have done if we'd been told the child showed signs of a disease that would condemn the child to death (and us to so many medical bills we would have never had the money for another child) before the child even reached a year old. Worse, I read a story of a mother (and I cannot find it now) who chose to give birth even after the blood test and ultrasound findings, and she watched her child slowly die. Could you REALLY condemn someone to this? Both the child and the parents?

    I understand not wanting to pay for abortion used as birth control--but there are so many OTHER reasons for abortions to happen, how can you deny financial help to parents who have to make such a horrible decision to begin with?
    Curlyben's Avatar
    Curlyben Posts: 18,514, Reputation: 1860
    BossMan
     
    #53

    Sep 8, 2012, 07:19 AM
    Sorry excon, but time to close this one.
    This is a subject we will all never agree on so rather than descending further into well known territory lets salvage some sense of respectability...
    ScottGem's Avatar
    ScottGem Posts: 64,966, Reputation: 6056
    Computer Expert and Renaissance Man
     
    #54

    Sep 8, 2012, 04:15 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Synnen View Post
    I understand not wanting to pay for abortion used as birth control--but there are so many OTHER reasons for abortions to happen, how can you deny financial help to parents who have to make such a horrible decision to begin with?
    I just had to respond to this with an AMEN!

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search


Check out some similar questions!

I am 27 yrs old, I had an abortion 6 yrs ago after abortion I put multiloader (loop). [ 1 Answers ]

I am 27 yrs old, I had an abortion 6 yrs ago after abortion I put multiloader (loop). After 2 yrs got pregnant and again I aborted the child and got 3 yrs loop inserted. Last month I took of the loop. My husband still do not wants a child I do not have a single kid. 1: Is again putting Loop for 3...

When I talk my lips become sticky and dry .I feel embrass to talk so I [ 1 Answers ]

When I start to talk my lips become dry and sticky,and it gets embrass I need help with this promble,I've tried drinking water,chewing gun ,used mouth spray .

Girlfriend taking a break. To talk or not to talk [ 52 Answers ]

My girlfriend of over a year has decided to take a break. All of a sudden, something clicked in her head and she feels that we're too young to have such a serious relationship. She doesn't want to miss out on all the experiences life has to offer. Mind you, she was always the one who talked about...


View more questions Search