 |
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2012, 07:31 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
Ex what was on the President's Year Book ? that he was a member of the Choom gang ? Yeah I think it was.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2012, 07:40 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Hello again, Steve:
Pssst... It the Onion. You can also read about Michael Phelps returning to his tank at Sea World.
excon
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2012, 08:04 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by excon
Hello again, Steve:
Pssst.... It the Onion. You can also read about Michael Phelps returning to his tank at Sea World.
excon
Psst, I know it's The Onion. Even they get how silly and shallow the attacks on Romney/Ryan are. Right up there with your yearbook pic.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2012, 08:27 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Right up there with your yearbook pic.
Hello again, Steve:
Here's a nice pitcha...
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Aug 13, 2012, 08:35 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Psst, I know it's The Onion. Even they get how silly and shallow the attacks on Romney/Ryan are. Right up there with your yearbook pic.
But Speech, we have 3 years of SILLY to catch up to you guys on, but we probably never will, as the right wing silly NEVER stops!
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2012, 08:50 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
But Speech, we have 3 years of SILLY to catch up to you guys on, but we probably never will, as the right wing silly NEVER stops!
LOL, after 8 years of Bush Derangement Syndrome... wait, that's still alive and well. No sir, you guys are light years ahead on the silly and shallow factor.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2012, 09:05 AM
|
|
Hello again,
Ok, let's spell it out... We have a clear choice about the future of our country... One side wants to eliminate Medicare as we know it, and make draconian cuts to every single program designed to keep the poor from starving. The cuts they make WON'T go toward reducing the deficit either. They'll go toward massive tax cuts for the wealthiest amongst us. Finally, they'll take women's health care back 100 years, and bring back the coat hanger abortion.
The OTHER side wants to keep the safety net in place, and even expand it to those who fall through the cracks... Finally, they want the richest amongst us to pay their fair share.
That's about it, isn't it? Over to you, wingers.
excon
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2012, 09:30 AM
|
|
One side wants to eliminate Medicare as we know it
Would that be the side that cut Medicare by $ 700 billion ? Oh yeah I know ;when the Dems cut Medicare to fund Obamacare it's called saving it .
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2012, 09:34 AM
|
|
Hello again,
Yes, I have more to say... Ryan, the Tea Party fav, is clearly running the show. His pick should give Grover Norquist a woody. "All we need is someone who can 'handle a pen'."
He's got his man.
excon
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2012, 09:41 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by excon
Hello again,
Ok, let's spell it out... We have a clear choice about the future of our country... One side wants to eliminate Medicare as we know it, and make draconian cuts ...
We have one side that's serious about getting the country on the right track and one side being silly, shallow and running on clichés. Clichés aren't going to feed the poor.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2012, 09:52 AM
|
|
The RR team will advance a return to American Exceptionalism, free market economics, energy independence, reducing taxes and the strangling regulation on the job producer.
The Obots will continue to advance the issues that RR will kill you, your wife, throw granny off the cliff and deny Sandra Fluke her birth control pills.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2012, 10:00 AM
|
|
Hello again, tom:
Even though our terms were different, I think we BOTH encapsulated the debate.
Now what?
excon
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Aug 13, 2012, 10:05 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by speechlesstx
We have one side that's serious about getting the country on the right track and one side being silly, shallow and running on cliches. Cliches aren't going to feed the poor.
Neither will Romneys cuts or his tax policies. Matter of fact, we allwill be poor and hungry.
 Originally Posted by tomder55
The RR team will advance a return to American Exceptionalism, free market economics, energy independence, reducing taxes and the strangling regulation on the job producer.
The Obots will continue to advance the issues that RR will kill you, your wife, throw granny off the cliff and deny Sandra Fluke her birth control pills.
That's translates to more for the rich who will pee on our heads and call it the Path To Prosperity.
No wonder you guys like throwing rocks from the right, ITS FUN, no brain needed. HEHEHE!! Not much in debating points though, but FUN!!
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2012, 10:34 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
Neither will Romneys cuts or his tax policies. Matter of fact, we allwill be poor and hungry.
Only because Obama tied the Catholic church's hands and will only let them feed Catholics.
That's translates to more for the rich who will pee on our heads and call it the Path To Prosperity.
At least we know where the money to get the economy going comes from. Your guy thinks jobs come from the "bottom up" with Big Brother's benevolent blessing.
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Aug 13, 2012, 10:55 AM
|
|
QUOTE by speechlesstx;
Only because Obama tied the Catholic church's hands and will only let them feed Catholics.
What poor people need an ID to get fed now?
At least we know where the money to get the economy going comes from. Your guy thinks jobs come from the "bottom up" with Big Brother's benevolent blessing.
Ask small business who there customers are. It ain't Mitt, or Trump. Customers who have money to spend is what keeps the economy going.
So who needs the money to create jobs? We do, us middle class blue collar guys, and gals. Mitt hides his loot overseas. Ask him how many blue collar people can afford the services he provides. NONE!!
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2012, 11:24 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
What poor people need an ID to get fed now?
How quickly you forget, or just ignore.
As all of us know, Catholic Charities serves the poor because we are a Catholic organization, not because our clients are Catholic. We strongly believe at Catholic Charities that we witness our faith by our service to the poor. We ask only, “Are you hungry?” “Do you need clothing?” or “Are you homeless?” Under the HHS mandate, to be a “religious employer” we would now have to ask, “Are you Catholic?” This goes against everything that Catholic Charities stands for as an organization. Under the HHS mandate, we are punished for both employing and reaching out to serve non-Catholics, which is an injustice.
Again, because Obama thinks free birth control is the most important thing to women (after abortion) the church will no longer be able to feed the hungry.
Ask small business who there customers are. It ain't Mitt, or Trump. Customers who have money to spend is what keeps the economy going.
Those who don't have much to spend are spending it at Walmart and dollar stores, just adding to corporate riches.
So who needs the money to create jobs? We do, us middle class blue collar guys, and gals. Mitt hides his loot overseas. Ask him how many blue collar people can afford the services he provides. NONE!!
So no one buys from Domino's Pizza, Guitar Center, Staples, Burger King, Dunkin' Donuts or any of the other businesses Bain acquired?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2012, 01:37 PM
|
|
And by the way, even the left-leaning Politifact voted the Ryan "eliminate Medicare as we know it" lie the " lie of the year" for 2011. Oh, and did you know that the latest version of the Ryan plan was the product of a bipartisan effort by Ryan and Democrat Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon?
You probably did but go ahead, keep telling the lie of the year anyway.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2012, 01:56 PM
|
|
He knew that factoid as far back as the 9th response on this thred and probably earlier. I wonder if Wyden will be primaried by the radical progressives that have taken over the Dem party.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2012, 04:39 PM
|
|
You know I have to laugh at how niaive some people think the voters are. Here is a man who thinks attacking the benefits of the aged is a successful electoral ploy. A very short term and short sighted policy. Ok he wants to cap the cost, so perhaps he could try different strategies, like changing the elegibility rules, but to throw granny off the cliff with a hankerchief for a parachute might just be electoral suicide
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Nolan ryan
[ 3 Answers ]
I have a nolan ryan baseball card when he was a baby. Can someone tell me how much it is worth
View more questions
Search
|