Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #1

    Oct 8, 2013, 09:56 AM
    Should we DEFAULT, or maybe not?
    Hello:

    Will DEFAULT ruin us, or is it just a liberal plot?

    The Tea Party's JOB is to shrink government.. IF they actually FORCE us into default, in order NOT to ACTUALLY default, the government will have to SLASH around $600 BILLION worth of discretionary spending, IMMEDIATELY...

    The Tea Party will LOVE it. That's what they WANT. And, that's what they're going to do.

    Tell me it ain't so.

    excon
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #2

    Oct 8, 2013, 09:59 AM
    I heard that the TP actually may be trying to get rid of the Office of the President so that there will be only two branches of government.
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #3

    Oct 8, 2013, 10:05 AM
    Hello Carol:

    They are clearly trying to destroy the presidency... Like during the McCarthy era, some grownup needs to tell the tea party to shut the F**K up.

    excon
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #4

    Oct 8, 2013, 10:50 AM
    If there is a default it will be the actions of the emperor... not Congress . Question his motives. Why is he ginning up the worse fears hoping for a market response before the deadline?
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #5

    Oct 8, 2013, 11:04 AM
    The One's motives are above reproach don't you know?
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #6

    Oct 8, 2013, 11:10 AM
    What shutdown? Every time the headlines read about somebody suffering because of no government, Bonehead and the TParty write a bill. At this rate, we will have the good ole US of A running full tilt in the next century. Depends on how many TParty presidents we get elected.

    Or by next month we will be so ashamed of ourselves, we will destroy the TParty, like we should have done 4 years ago.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #7

    Oct 8, 2013, 11:21 AM
    So you don't think the items in the budget should be debated ? Yeah I get it.. just rubber stamp current spending ,tack on c.o.l.'s and add more spending priorities on top of the existing budget ad infinitum . That's how we get to where we are having a debt greater than the GDP. It's got to end one way or the other... by scaling back ,or free fall. It's the conservatives that have the correct perspective and giving sob stories in the praetorian press doesn't change that fact . If you have concerns about something not getting funded then how can your side vote against the individual funding issues ?
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #8

    Oct 8, 2013, 11:28 AM
    To Dems it's not about getting anything funded, it's all about winning and hopefully destroying the GOP in the process. That is ALL that matters to them.
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #9

    Oct 8, 2013, 11:28 AM
    Hello again, tom:
    so you don't think the items in the budget should be debated ?
    Sure.. But, not with a gun to our head. What kind of negotiation is THAT?? By threatening to default if you don't get what you want ISN'T negotiation.. It's EXTORTION. Negotiation happens when NOBODY is held hostage by the negotiations.

    That AIN'T what you're doing, and even you can't pretend you are.

    Excon
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #10

    Oct 8, 2013, 11:32 AM
    Release the hostages! Doesn't matter what your ransom is! You psycho deadbeats!!
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #11

    Oct 8, 2013, 11:33 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello again, tom:
    Sure.. But, not with a gun to our head. What kind of negotiations is THAT???

    excon
    What the hell is Obama and Reid doing with their all or nothing, we will not negotiate under any circumstances tactic? Really, ex? Don't give me that Republicans are negotiating with a gun to their head BS, it is your side that refuses to even talk. How does one negotiate if one side refuses to talk?

    P.S. But hey, thank God Obama is taking on the Washington Redskins since there's nothing else to worry about.
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #12

    Oct 8, 2013, 11:45 AM
    Hello again, Steve:
    What the hell is Obama and Reid doing with their all or nothing, we will not negotiate under any circumstances tactic? Really,
    Let's review, shall we?

    What you want to negotiate is something that you COULDN'T win in congress, COULDN'T win in the Supreme Court, and COULDN'T win in the last election...

    Well my friend, you ain't going to win it now. And, holding the country hostage until you DO, AIN'T our DEMOCRATIC process. It's EXTORTION, plain and simple.

    Excon
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #13

    Oct 8, 2013, 11:52 AM
    You have been refusing to talk for 8 months, and the last time you tried this strategy we got downgraded.

    It's everybody's fault but yours. Your hands are as dirty as ours but we admit that imperfection, while you think you have cornered the market on perfection. SAD!
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #14

    Oct 8, 2013, 11:55 AM
    You two are delusional.
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #15

    Oct 8, 2013, 02:20 PM
    Hello again, Steve:
    You two are delusional.
    Wow! I really worked on that post. It was well thought out. I used good English. It was cogent, succinct, accurate and witty. Where did I go wrong?

    Let's review. If you COULD have won in congress, you WOULD have. But, you LOST. If you COULD have won in the Supreme Court, you WOULD have.. But, you LOST. If you COULD have won in the last election, you WOULD have, but you LOST.

    What do you NOT get about our democratic system? If I'm delusional, tell me where my FACTS are wrong. Oh, you don't LIKE the facts, I know, but that doesn't entitle you to make up your own.

    Over to you, winger.

    Excon
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #16

    Oct 8, 2013, 02:40 PM
    Before the wingers jump in Ex, its to be expected that after all the past failures of the right, they would be desperate to validate their hollering and squealing of the past 5 years.

    That's why we are delusional, because we keep winning despite their best efforts. So please, show sympathy for the minority.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #17

    Oct 8, 2013, 02:40 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello again, Steve:
    Wow! I really worked on that post. It was well thought out. I used good English. It was cogent, succinct, accurate and witty. Where did I go wrong??

    Let's review. If you COULD have won in congress, you WOULD have. But, you LOST. If you COULD have won in the Supreme Court, you WOULD have.. But, you LOST. If you COULD have won in the last election, you WOULD have, but you LOST.

    What do you NOT get about our democratic system?? If I'm delusional, tell me where my FACTS are wrong. Oh, you don't LIKE the facts, I know, but that doesn't entitle you to make up your own.

    Over to you, winger.

    excon
    Winning or losing the presidential election has nothing to do with it, Obama refuses to do his job and negotiate. In fact, he called Boehner just to tell him he wasn't talking to him. So if you two think it's all the GOP's fault and they should roll over for the dictator you're delusional.

    The House has continued to put forth legislation and the dictator and the Senate Dems refuse to let it see the light of day. That would be the same Dingy harry Reid that refused to put out a budget for several years AS REQUIRED BY LAW, and the same dictator that said no one was going to stop the sequester cuts he supported. Like I said, we're not stupid... history doesn't change because you keep repeating the same BS.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #18

    Oct 8, 2013, 02:47 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    Before the wingers jump in Ex, its to be expected that after all the past failures of the right, they would be desperate to validate their hollering and squealing of the past 5 years.

    That's why we are delusional, because we keep winning despite their best efforts. So please, show sympathy for the minority.
    The only reason Dems win is because they lie incessantly, continually move the goalpost and the media covers for them. Obamacare is built entirely on a lie, and you cover for the lies in this debate.

    Obamacare Snake Oil | National Review Online
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #19

    Oct 8, 2013, 02:49 PM
    Hello again, Steve:
    The House has continued to put forth legislation and the dictator and the Senate Dems refuse to let it see the light of day.
    I don't know WHY you have such an aversion to the truth. (Hey. Let's start a thread with that name.)

    Here's the TRUTH. You want the president to negotiate SETTLED law, and if he doesn't, you'll crash the economy.

    I can keep on saying that, and I'll probably have to.

    Excon
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #20

    Oct 8, 2013, 02:50 PM
    I think the Prez is doing a fine job, even if you guys don't think so, well maybe he isn't progressive enough by my standards, but he drives you guys nutsy bozo, so he can't be too bad.

    Now Ted Cruz being president of the US is delusional. And that's putting it mildly.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Entry Default / Default Judgment [ 2 Answers ]

I am almost in my final stage of my CA Divorce Process (in pro per). I have a pending OSC modification hearing scheduled 07/12/2012. Once I get the outcome of this OSC hearing, I will file my default judgement to include this order. I had filed an entry of default filed 12/2010 (no response...

Motion for order setting aside default / vacating default judgement eviction [ 1 Answers ]

My landlord won a unlawful detainer against me and he now would like to motion to the court to set aside default / vacating default judgement. We worked things out and wants to stop the lock out and allow me to stay.

Default Judgement [ 4 Answers ]

I entered into a agreement with a creditor to pay off an account I fell late on the payment and they entered a default and a judgement was ordered. I had paid 1,500 so far out of 5,000. They levied my bank account for 1,300 and now I'm afraid that they will seize my car. Can they do that if I...

Default Judgment [ 8 Answers ]

In 1996 I bought my son a set of drums. I received financing for the drum set from a financial company. In 1997 I lost my job and could not make the payments and called the company to let them know I had lost my job and could not afford to may payment and that I was moving out of state and let...


View more questions Search