[geneva13]

A 29-year-old woman had an obstetrical ultrasound at 33 weeks to follow-up a previous finding of a low-lying placenta. Although the placental location was now acceptable, the amniotic fluid index (AFI) was noted to be 8.9 cm. Subsequent monitoring remained reassuring until 38.5 weeks, when the AFI was 6 cm. The patient declined the recommendation to induce labor, and also refused to present for any further monitoring. She stated that she did not believe in medical interventions. Nevertheless, she continued with her prenatal visits. At 41 weeks, she submitted to a further AFI, which was found to be 1.8 cm. She and her husband continued to decline the recommendation for induced labor.
Which ethical duty takes precedence, the duty to respect the patient's autonomous decision, or the duty to benefit a viable fetus? Is induction of labor a harmful intervention, subject to the principle of nonmaleficence?

[J_9]

Is this homework?

[J_9]

As a labor and delivery nurse I am willing to help you with your homework, but I cannot just give you the answer outright. I need you to tell me what the answer is and why you think that answer is correct.

[J_9]

Let's put it this way... Are you going to handcuff the mother and drag her to L&D for induction? Are you going to do teaching and let her make an informed decision regarding the outcome of her decision?

Have you learned about AMA (Against Medical Advice) yet?

Use your critical thinking skills you have been taught thus far.