[excon]

just wondering if those the most concerned about it are willing to lead by example and stop breathing.

Hello again, Steve:

I understand... They're not credible because they breath, and they'd rather NOT ride their bicycles to meetings...

That's all you got?? Dude!

excon

[speechlesstx]

I understand... They're not credible because they breath, and they'd rather NOT ride their bicycles to meetings....

That's all you got???? Dude!

You know that ain't all I got, I'm the one that broke the Climategate scandal here. The point is the eco-nuts, like all the other elites, are all too willing to impose solutions on us such as population control, it's time they lead by example.

[TUT317]

They were delegates to a climate conference .If they weren't scientists they were at very minimum relying on the 'settled science ' as a rational for making policy that will impact us all. If policy is made based on bad science then it probably by extention is bad policy.

Hi Tom,

I don't necessarily disagree with this.

Bad science may lead to good policy while good science may lead to bad policy. Naturally, bad science can lead to bad policy and good science can lead to good policy and anything in between. We are all very bad at predicting the future.

It is just that some of the views on this topic have been, and continue to be 'over the top'.