Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    ActionJackson's Avatar
    ActionJackson Posts: 301, Reputation: 28
    Full Member
     
    #121

    Jun 23, 2007, 05:16 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by jillianleab
    AJ

    Well, see that's the thing. Behe DIDN'T use new tools to discover anything. He took old tools and just didn't follow their directions and came up with new findings.

    The advancements in modern labratory tools ARE new tools. My old wood handled shovel broke awhile back. I went and bought a new one. It had a fiberglass handle with a foam rubber grip and the shovel was more ergonomically desgined. New tools provide better work environments. So what you're saying is that he didn't follow the standard marching orders which allowed him to "come up with NEW FINDINGS." Cool!

    Is a screwdriver a hammer if I use it to beat a nail into the wall?

    Certainly. Not a good one though; however, if the nail is in the wall, I guess that's all that matters.

    How come you let tal off the hook but you seem determined to beat a dead horse with me? There is no way you will bring me to your line of thinking.

    Oh I know that I won't change your mind and I have no intention of trying. I'm just exposing the fallacies of your arguments. You haven't even read the book and yet you play judge, jury, and executioner as you take potshots at Behe's credibility. I find that unprofessional and hypocritical. That's all. You still haven't admitted that you haven't read the book because you don't want to look bad.

    You provided Behe's name as a authority, and I've shown you that perhaps, he's not one.

    At least you used the word "perhaps." That's not a scientific absolute. Bravo. I provided his name as an alternative to the norm and status quo. Everyone knows about the theory of evolution that is relentlessly passed of as fact. It's not a fact. There are many, many missing pieces to the evolutionary puzzle. Behe, on the other hand, shows the layman how microsopic organism operate and function and simply asks how that organism could survive without any one of its components. It's a good question. No answers as of yet from the scientific peanut gallery. He's attacked for some statement he may have made but nobody has attacked his findings. If any of his discoveries or findings were faulty, you could rest assured that the science gurus would be all over it.

    I'm trying to make you think, to reconsider.

    In an earlier statement, you said that you weren't trying to change my mind. Okey-dokey then.

    You have no support to your argument that Behe's theory holds any water in the scientific sense.

    But Behe does and you have no evidence to refute his facts.

    If you simply say, "I believe his theory because I have faith" I can accept that, but as long as you claim science has anything to do with it, when clearly it has been demonstrated to the contrary, I have to insist you are mistaken. Want to prove yourself right? Get the scientific community to agree with you instead of me.
    The scientific community believes the world is flat (metaphorically speaking) so I have no intention of trying to convince them of anything. If Behe's common sense, well written, fact based book can't do it then neither could an atom bomb. A few Michael Behe types will have to be burned at the scientifc stake before the dullards will give up on their beloved god, Charles Darwin. And good day to you.
    ActionJackson's Avatar
    ActionJackson Posts: 301, Reputation: 28
    Full Member
     
    #122

    Jun 23, 2007, 05:25 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by ordinaryguy
    AJ, this is a wonderfully succinct statement of the fundamentalist approach to religion and the spiritual life. May you find fulfillment and satisfaction in your battles.
    I shall and thank you. Adhering to the fundamentals of Christianity and God's Word is a good thing. Christ did it; Paul did it; Peter did it; why shouldn't I?
    Curlyben's Avatar
    Curlyben Posts: 18,514, Reputation: 1860
    BossMan
     
    #123

    Jun 23, 2007, 05:27 AM
    As this thread is becoming more argumentative I'm closing it NOW.
    If you have a problem with this feel free to PM me.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search


Check out some similar questions!

What equals 1,000,000 [ 12 Answers ]

I have been asked this question and have absolutley NO idea on what the answer is, someone please help me! Ok here's the question. If a = 1, b = 2, z = 26, is there a word that when the values of the letters are multiplied will make a product of one million? For example, BAD = (2)(1)(4) = 8.

What would you do with $50,000 ? [ 8 Answers ]

Ok lets roll some ideas, what would you do if you have $50,000? What will you invest in? Let me know your brainic ideas but keep it away from pubs and stocks :)

Earth three hundred years from now? [ 19 Answers ]

How do you envision the conditions of this earth three hundred years from now: 1. still divided by nationalism, 2. a nuclear holocaust wasteland, 3. or transformed by God into a global paradise earth without nationalistic boundaries?

Theft of about 10,000 [ 15 Answers ]

I'm thinking I'm going to go to court for this. No charges have been made as of yet. I am a 19 year old female, with no prior record. I stole the money by refunding it to my bank card at a place I used to work. I am willing to make restitution, and I do regret doing it. There was a prior...

Theft Under 5,000 [ 5 Answers ]

So I pretty much rock, I'm 19 from BC canada- aprehended this evening for theft under 5,000. Its my first offence - I was picked up by the stores security - it was a USED shirt worth like 6 bucks ( using it for halloween didn't have any cash on me) security wrote up a bunch of paper work and...


View more questions Search