Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #81

    Apr 7, 2013, 03:31 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Tuttyd View Post
    But that's the whole idea. There is a lack of interest because it is not something that certain ethnic groups would consider.

    In a similar way people who live in the poorer areas of the inner city would probably not consider a course in becoming a greenkeeper or a golf professional.
    Then there really is no issue then if there is a lack of qualified black lifeguards.
    Tuttyd's Avatar
    Tuttyd Posts: 53, Reputation: 4
    Junior Member
     
    #82

    Apr 7, 2013, 03:36 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    then there really is no issue then if there is a lack of qualified black lifeguards.

    I am sure it would be an issue. But I don't have a problem with on the job training. Provided of course it is supervised on the job training until qualifications are obtained
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #83

    Apr 7, 2013, 04:33 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Tuttyd View Post
    I don't think anyone is forcing anyone to become a lifeguard. Are they?
    Did I say they were? No, I'm referring to ensuring the city has enough minority lifeguards when they already had qualified white lifeguards... is there a problem with lifeguards being white? The question is why does color matter? I say it doesn't, the left says it doesn't, so why do they need minority lifeguards?



    I would have seen this as being a role model.
    White lifeguards can't be a role model to minorities?



    A large number of people might want to claim to be at "ease with the other" but I suspect that only exists on the surface.
    I would suspect that's true for a lot of people, but I believe conservatives are more at ease than liberals. We aren't the ones making everything about race and denigrating minorities who dare step outside the liberal box.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #84

    Apr 7, 2013, 04:47 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Tuttyd View Post
    I am sure it would be an issue. But I don't have a problem with on the job training. Provided of course it is supervised on the job training until qualifications are obtained
    On the job training is not the issue.
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #85

    Apr 7, 2013, 05:33 PM
    All this over one guy who isn't white but wants to be a life guard??
    Tuttyd's Avatar
    Tuttyd Posts: 53, Reputation: 4
    Junior Member
     
    #86

    Apr 8, 2013, 03:50 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    Why does diversity have to forced? I think it's a silly and divisive exercise. I don't care about skin color, ethicity or whatever until some liberal says something about being "too white." How much white is too white and why does it matter? Is there such a thing as too black or too brown?

    Should we really care if the person rescuing us from drowning is a certain color? After all that was one the city's justifications, the swimmers can relate better to someone that looks like the and that's ridiculous. I thought the end goal was to be at ease with other in spite of that, it's a designed segregation. Forcing diversity on one hand while engineering segregation on the other seems rather silly.
    I have reread the posts on this thread and I think I know what you are getting at when you point to the fact that diversity is being forced upon everyone.

    This particular pool seems to be favoured by certain ethnic groups. So why would it be desirable to replace what little diversity there is with ethnic life guards? In other words, by employing ethnic lifeguards we are pushing segregation even further.

    I think this is what you are saying with the above comment.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #87

    Apr 8, 2013, 04:38 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    All this over one guy who isn't white but wants to be a life guard?????
    No, all this over what liberal policy has wrought.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #88

    Apr 8, 2013, 04:39 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Tuttyd View Post
    I have reread the posts on this thread and I think I know what you are getting at when you point to the fact that diversity is being forced upon everyone.

    This particular pool seems to be favoured by certain ethnic groups. So why would it be desirable to replace what little diversity there is with ethnic life guards? In other words, by employing ethnic lifeguards we are pushing segregation even further.

    I think this is what you are saying with the above comment.
    You're on the right track.
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #89

    Apr 8, 2013, 04:42 AM
    Hello again, Steve:

    No, all this over what liberal policy has wrought
    Yeah, Republican policy has done SOOO much for the black man... They made him stand in line for 6-8 hours to vote... Who do those uppity people think they are, wanting to vote like a white man?

    Excon
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #90

    Apr 8, 2013, 05:00 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello again, Steve:

    Yeah, Republican policy has done SOOO much for the black man... They made him stand in line for 6-8 hours to vote... Who do those uppity people think they are, wanting to vote like a white man??

    excon
    That's already been debunked but you keep on pushing that narrative if it makes you feel better. The question is how does one reconcile practicing both diversity and segregation simultaneously? A rather confusing message wouldn't you say?
    Tuttyd's Avatar
    Tuttyd Posts: 53, Reputation: 4
    Junior Member
     
    #91

    Apr 8, 2013, 05:06 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    You're on the right track.

    Yes, I though this was the problem. At least we have something concrete to work with now.

    One way of looking at the problem is segregation versus integration. This approach has important historical implications that might be helpful as well.

    It can be argued that these "liberal policies" are pushing for segregation of ethnic groups. However, the important point is that this form of segregation is done on the ethnic groups own terms. In other words, despite the policies being implement the choice to integrate or not to integrate into the wider culture is still a matter for the individual.

    There is no doubt that many people who belong to ethnic groups choose to embrace the dominant culture of the society they live in. In other words, they choose to be integrated. On the other side of the coin there would be people who feel ( for what ever reason) uncomfortable with the dominant culture. Instead they choose segregation, but segregation on their own terms.

    In the end it is an attempt to provide alternatives for what has historically been a single choice problem. Only having one choice is not a choice.
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #92

    Apr 8, 2013, 05:08 AM
    So one ethnic lifeguard at one pool is forcing diversity, down whose throat? NO wait my bad. Its perpetrating segregation. Have I got that right? That's a back handed way of saying there should be no ethnic life guards at all.

    If you feel that way about ONE ethnic kid, I guess 10 would be a complete disaster.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #93

    Apr 8, 2013, 05:20 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Tuttyd View Post
    Yes, I though this was the problem. At least we have something concrete to work with now.

    One way of looking at the problem is segregation versus integration. This approach has important historical implications that might be helpful as well.

    It can be argued that these "liberal policies" are pushing for segregation of ethnic groups. However, the important point is that this form of segregation is done on the ethnic groups own terms. In other words, despite the policies being implement the choice to integrate or not to integrate into the wider culture is still a matter for the individual.

    There is no doubt that many people who belong to ethnic groups choose to embrace the dominant culture of the society they live in. In other words, they choose to be integrated. On the other side of the coin there would be people who feel ( for what ever reason) uncomfortable with the dominant culture. Instead they choose segregation, but segregation on their own terms.

    In the end it is an attempt to provide alternatives for what has historically been a single choice problem. Only having one choice is not a choice.
    Yes, self-segregation is one thing and it's increasing here. But that also goes back to my earlier question on the left's narrative in this regard, it's only an issue if they label something as "too white." What is "too white" and is there such a thing as too black?
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #94

    Apr 8, 2013, 05:24 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    So one ethnic lifeguard at one pool is forcing diversity, down whose throat? NO wait my bad. Its perpetrating segregation. Have I got that right? That's a back handed way of saying there should be no ethnic life guards at all.

    If you feel that way about ONE ethnic kid, I guess 10 would be a complete disaster.
    I believe I've already said I don't care who gets the job, race/color/ethinicity does not matter to me. I'm trying to figure out if it matters to liberals or not, they send a very mixed message.
    Tuttyd's Avatar
    Tuttyd Posts: 53, Reputation: 4
    Junior Member
     
    #95

    Apr 8, 2013, 05:34 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    Yes, self-segregation is one thing and it's increasing here. But that also goes back to my earlier question on the left's narrative in this regard, it's only an issue if they label something as "too white." What is "too white" and is there such a thing as too black?
    That's a difficult question to answer. I don't really know people's thinking about race and ethnicity.I guess that the implication here is that ethnicity has something to do with the physical characteristics of the individual.

    I would also guess that most of us don't make the distinction between biology and sociology for this purpose.

    Other than that I don't really know.
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #96

    Apr 8, 2013, 05:50 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    I believe I've already said I don't care who gets the job, race/color/ethinicity does not matter to me. I'm trying to figure out if it matters to liberals or not, they send a very mixed message.
    I personally don't see the problem as "they" are dealing with a very specific local issue. I say the more people who try to make good the better.
    Tuttyd's Avatar
    Tuttyd Posts: 53, Reputation: 4
    Junior Member
     
    #97

    Apr 8, 2013, 05:56 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    I believe I've already said I don't care who gets the job, race/color/ethinicity does not matter to me. I'm trying to figure out if it matters to liberals or not, they send a very mixed message.
    I don't think it matters or doesn't matter to many because some people don't consider the wider implications. However, for the reasons I have outlined earlier the result of such policies provides choice.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #98

    Apr 8, 2013, 06:22 AM
    I say it's ridiculous. Again from the article:

    After noticing that most of the lifeguards at the public pools used by Latino and African-American kids were white, the Phoenix aquatics department decided to try to recruit minorities.

    More than 90 percent of the students at Alhambra High are black, Latino or Asian. On a recruiting effort there over the winter, the city's Melissa Boyle tells students she's not looking for strong swimmers. Like many under-resourced schools, Alhambra doesn't have a swim team.

    "We will work with you in your swimming abilities," Boyle says.

    Boyle's colleague Kelly Martinez takes on the delicate task of explaining the scenario the city is trying to correct.

    "The kids in the pool are all either Hispanic or black or whatever, and every lifeguard is white," she says, "and we don't like that. The kids don't relate; there's language issues."
    I have no problem recruiting minorities, but reverse the situation and put those words coming out of a conservative's mouth. "Every lifeguard is black, and we don't like that." That wouldn't disturb anyone would it?
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #99

    Apr 8, 2013, 08:46 AM
    On from lifeguards to much more disturbing stuff. MSNBC is actually saying what I suspect many on the left have have been thinking for a long time. In a new promo, they're telling us, "We have to break through our kind of private idea that kids belong to their parents”

    Excuse me? Have you people lost your freakin' minds?
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #100

    Apr 8, 2013, 08:51 AM
    Hello again, Steve:

    We have to break through our kind of private idea that kids belong to their parents
    What do you think the FEMA camps are for?

    Excon

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search


Check out some similar questions!

High rev vibration [ 4 Answers ]

I have a Honda 200es three wheeler and every time I get to the higher revs it vibrates so violently. It does it in neutral as well. The previous owner said it would need a new front wheel bearing soon. Do you think that would be the problem?

Goodman GU125-4 Rev. S [ 0 Answers ]

Furnace does not kick on when dialing thermostat. Tried the following. Jumpered term. R and W and hear a click from the unit but nothing happens. When dialing up thermostat hear same click nothing happens. Tried tripping the breaker for approx. 30sec to no avail. When I dial the nob in the...

Gmp075 3 rev b [ 1 Answers ]

What ton is the GMP 075-3 REV B gas heating unit?

Rev Rul 91-58 [ 2 Answers ]

The facts are the following: 1. Client is a Mexican national 2. He was in graduate school in the US and after receiving Ph.D. in 2007 returned to Mexico and started employment 3. Client became married to a US citizen in 2008 4. Client was not a US resident for tax purposes for any part of 2008...

What does Rev 14:1 mean to you? [ 21 Answers ]

The Lamb. Mount Zion. 144,000. I am curious to know what this scripture means to other God fearing people. :)


View more questions Search