[paraclete]

well I can see where he might reject some of their dogma. Fact is they have become an exclusive club, and very self serving

[talaniman]

The pope is a rino??

[paraclete]

I think he might be a watermellon

[Tuttyd]

"I linked the transcript earlier. It's far more outrageous that Time reported the Pope rejects his own church's dogma and other liberals have been misinterpreting his words to support their agenda"


You might have linked it earlier but it's a pity Rush didn't see the link. Time reporting that the church rejects its own dogma is definitely outrageous. In light of your comment, where does reporting the Pope is espousing Marxism fit on the outrageous scale?

Yes, liberals have been misinterpreting his words for their own political ends, just like Rush misinterpreted the Pope's words for his own political ends.

[speechlesstx]

No, Rush was opining, the libs were using it for political ends. There is a difference.

[talaniman]

Of course Rush has no political agenda when he does his opining.

[speechlesstx]

Only a fool would believe Rush doesn't have a political agenda, just as only a fool can't tell the difference between merely expressing an opinion and manipulating for political points.

[talaniman]

It's all politics. They all try to manipulate for control of the money. Only a fool doesn't know that.

[speechlesstx]

Funny how the one always talking about money is you.

[talaniman]

Because I am not a fool, nor a moron, or stupid. It's always about who controls the money. ALWAYS. That's the true nature of politics, and governance!

[speechlesstx]

Yet you like to pretend your side is less guilty.

[talaniman]

Guilty as charged. But we resolve the conflicts with talking, right? Reaching a consensus. To the subject of THIS thread, Rush is at it again OPINING his idiocy.

Agreed?

Sure he has a right, but we have a right to express our OPINING for HIM?

Agreed?