Check out some similar questions!

paraclete · Apr 29, 2012, 03:22 PM

I'm having breakfast on my own I think I'll have borkin and egg

speechlesstx · May 2, 2012, 06:13 AM

borkin?

excon · May 2, 2012, 07:25 AM

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

borkin?

G'day, Mate:

Borkin is Australian for bacon.

excon

speechlesstx · May 2, 2012, 08:18 AM

I would hope so.

paraclete · May 2, 2012, 03:44 PM

No Ex is wrong I was speaking kiwi at the time

speechlesstx · May 3, 2012, 06:21 AM

You were speaking pretty good English except for 'borkin.'

paraclete · May 3, 2012, 03:53 PM

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

You were speaking pretty good English except for 'borkin.'

Hey it's a joke, have you no sense of humour

FirstChair · May 3, 2012, 10:50 PM

Bork Rinds... ok, I tried.

paraclete · May 4, 2012, 03:40 AM

Originally Posted by FirstChair

Bork Rinds...ok, I tried.

Look the kiwi has a speech impediment

So borkin and aigs, fush and chups, newspapers come from a dairy, you really don't want to know more

speechlesstx · May 4, 2012, 06:48 AM

Originally Posted by paraclete

Hey its a joke, have you no sense of humour

Don't accuse me of being a liberal, I have a great sense of humor. Just a communication barrier, we have those here, too.

paraclete · May 4, 2012, 04:53 PM

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

Don't accuse me of being a liberal, I have a great sense of humor. Just a communication barrier, we have those here, too.

Yes I've noticed

excon · May 5, 2012, 10:03 AM

Hello again,

This video about sums it up. Republican women speak.

excon

PS> Ok, maybe they're not Republicans..

FirstChair · May 5, 2012, 11:49 AM

I want the Democrats to stop using my womanhood for their mostly liberal propaganda and then obessing over my vagina. I want the Republicans to stop giving the Democrats reasons to be delusional because they think Republicans are trying to control my vagina.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxch-...layer_embedded

paraclete · May 5, 2012, 05:08 PM

Personally not interested in taking the debate to this level

tomder55 · May 5, 2012, 05:34 PM

The whole issue is a phony canard. Republicans held the Presidency for 20 of the last 32 years ,including 2 terms each of the 2 conservative Republicans . They also had control of the House of Representatives for a decade until 2006... and again in the current session of Congress. In all that time ,not once was there a move by either executive action ,or legislation that threatened the availabiltiy of contraceptions .
Now we are to believe that a moderate former Governor of Mass. Is more conservative than Goldwater (in Obama's words ),and that contraception availability is threatened . The truth is that the only changes proposed are by the radical POTUS and his Commisars who now think that contracpetion should not only be a "right " ,but also a "free" entitlement .

As I said ,it is a canard and a diversion . The President doesn't want us to dwell on the fact that the labor participation rate is the lowest it has been in the last 30 years .

paraclete · May 5, 2012, 08:19 PM

Canard isn't that some sort of duck, you know quacks like, waddles like, etc and that's the way I see this argument

talaniman · May 5, 2012, 09:17 PM

Originally Posted by tomder55

The whole issue is a phony canard. Republicans held the Presidency for 20 of the last 32 years ,including 2 terms each of the 2 conservative Republicans . They also had control of the House of Representatives for a decade until 2006 ...and again in the current session of Congress. In all that time ,not once was there a move by either executive action ,or legislation that threatened the availabiltiy of contraceptions .
Now we are to believe that a moderate former Governor of Mass. is more conservative than Goldwater (in Obama's words ),and that contraception availability is threatened . The truth is that the only changes proposed are by the radical POTUS and his Commisars who now think that contracpetion should not only be a "right " ,but also a "free" entitlement .

As I said ,it is a canard and a diversion . The President doesn't want us to dwell on the fact that the labor participation rate is the lowest it has been in the last 30 years .

But now all of a sudden there is a big push, both state and congress to go backward. What happened? Oh that's right, the job creators saw a democrat coming to clean up the mess so they hid the mop, broom, and bucket, and robbed the piggy bank blind, and blamed the new guy, and told the cops he went that away. Said it best, Mitts only job is to keep the pen hand loose and just sign where they tell him too!

Everybody signs what Grover says to sign. Mitt doesn't care, he gets paid handsomely for it.

I'm just laughing because the left won't be all Grover and Karl screw over, the right will be as poor as the left, that is if they do what the big boys want. They have already won the class war, so it's a sweat shop or nothing for the rest of us, you too Tom.

You can explain to us over peanut butter and beans how Mitt saved the world. Naw cancel that, I'll be marching to Washington, want me to pick you up on the way? Have your own gas money though!

tomder55 · May 6, 2012, 01:42 PM

Romney is on theme, jobs ,pro -growth and Federal finances.Hopefully he'll add flat taxes . Obama is left to defend the undefendable ;blame shift ,trash talk, and concoct phony fringe issues.

I guess he can take heart in the fact that Sarko lost to the commie Hollande in France today. Why go into austerity when there are still German Euros to spend ?

speechlesstx · May 7, 2012, 06:35 AM

Why is anyone talking about vaginas? Why not prostates? This is the silliest election cycle I think I've ever seen.

excon · May 7, 2012, 06:43 AM

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

Why is anyone talking about vaginas? Why not prostates?

Hello again, Steve:

I don't know how you missed it, but right wing states are passing LAWS that require a foreign object be put all UP INSIDE the vaginas of women who are seeking a legal abortion.. They're NOT passing laws about prostates..

excon