[Wondergirl]

Lame response if there ever was one. You don't post evidence because you don't have any.

Apparently, you haven't read that website either. And must be MAGAites. Or watched and listened to him (even on Fox News he was a bumbling idiot!) I cannot believe how two educated and usually sane men like you and tomder don't see through Trump. Even our cat howls in agony when he's on tv.

[tomder55]

I am clear headed and have no delusions . To me this is not a character election. I know where the respective candidates will lead the nation. Sometimes flawed people make good leaders ;and sometimes saints fail to lead. The examples of that are too many to mention.

So even if Trump is all you say he is ;in my mind he will be a better President because he has done so in the past . When Kam came up to the plate this term she has either whiffed or has been a no show. She did succeed in the one thing the Dems did intentionally . They intentionally created the inflation that is destroying the middle class they pretend to champion. She cast the deciding vote as President of the Senate to get that done.

I will keep on posting this Jim Clyburn comment.
Democrat Rep. Jim Clyburn Admits Democrats "KNEW" Inflation Would Result From Their Big Spending (youtube.com)

[jlisenbe]

Apparently, you haven't read that website either

Uhm...you haven't posted a website to read. You posted two youtube clips. I listened to one which had no evidence at all of slurred speech or mental confusion. The only mental confusion I'm seeing is from you when you complain about me not reading a Youtube clip. At any rate, you've already stated you don't need to post evidence because...well, just because.

[Wondergirl]

Uhm...you haven't posted a website to read. You posted two youtube clips. I listened to one which had no evidence at all of slurred speech or mental confusion. The only mental confusion I'm seeing is from you when you complain about me not reading a Youtube clip. At any rate, you've already stated you don't need to post evidence because...well, just because.

How about this:
"Should Google be broken up?” interviewer John Micklethwait, editor in chief of Bloomberg News, asked Trump on Tuesday.
Trump’s immediate response, in full:

"I just haven’t gotten over something the Justice Department did yesterday, where Virginia cleaned up its voter rolls and got rid of thousands and thousands of bad votes. And the Justice Department sued them, that they should be allowed to put those bad votes and illegal votes back in and let the people vote. So I haven’t — I haven’t gotten, I haven’t gotten over that. A lot of people have seen that and they can’t even believe it."

And there's more.

https://www.salon.com/2024/10/16/his...a5f5c89032d102

[tomder55]

I wrote about the Feds suing Va in support of illegal voters here

Election steal the 2024 edition - Page 2 (askmehelpdesk.com)

[jlisenbe]

You posted, "Should Google be broken up?” interviewer John Micklethwait, editor in chief of Bloomberg News, asked Trump on Tuesday.

The full question was as follows. "Maybe we can change the subject to technology, seeing you wouldn’t answer about the Federal Reserve. The US Justice Department is thinking about breaking up Alphabet as Google likes to be known now, should Google be broken up?"

So, when we are honest enough to include the entire question (you were not), then his answer, in going to the Justice Department, makes a great deal more sense. He didn't just pull it out of thin air.

Perfect example of why you should avoid using Trump-hating websites. The question is at about the 40 minute mark below. Took me all of about ten minutes to find this. Shame on you.

Donald Trump Economic Club of Chicago | Rev

[Wondergirl]

You posted, "Should Google be broken up?” interviewer John Micklethwait, editor in chief of Bloomberg News, asked Trump on Tuesday.

The full question was as follows. "Maybe we can change the subject to technology, seeing you wouldn’t answer about the Federal Reserve. The US Justice Department is thinking about breaking up Alphabet as Google likes to be known now, should Google be broken up?"

And what did Trump say then in answer to that question? (I'm very sure he doesn't know what Google is or how to use it. Has he ever touched a computer keyboard? Does he own and use a tablet?)

[jlisenbe]

If he doesn't know how to use Google, then perhaps he's in the same boat that you sometimes appear to be in. As I posted earlier, it took me all of about ten minutes to find the full question. I would not like to think that you didn't look because you didn't care enough about the truth to make the effort. I much prefer to think that you simply don't know how.

As to Trump's answer, he did what pols do repeatedly. He simply pivoted to an area that he considered to be more important, or possibly less threatening. Harris does that repeatedly. Watch the Fox interview if you want to know more about that.

[Wondergirl]

If he doesn't know how to use Google, then perhaps he's in the same boat that you sometimes appear to be in. As I posted earlier, it took me all of about ten minutes to find the full question. I would not like to think that you didn't look because you didn't care enough about the truth to make the effort. I much prefer to think that you simply don't know how.

Of course I know how to Google! I was a public librarian for almost 30 years. The shoe didn't fit for finding it and providing the correct answer (what he should have said), but since he doesn't know what the heck Google is, he sidestepped the question and ran off onto another topic.

As to Trump's answer, he did what pols do repeatedly. He simply pivoted to an area that he considered to be more important, or possibly less threatening. Harris does that repeatedly. Watch the Fox interview if you want to know more about that.

Ha ha ha ha ha!!! "he pivoted". Nope, he totally ignored it, not having the faintest idea about the question and how to answer it.

And Brett Baby didn't give Harris time to respond but rattled on and on with his own take on things. (And yes, I watched the interview in real time.)

[jlisenbe]

Of course I know how to Google!

Yeah. You just choose not to. Ignorance fueled by TDS is a terrible flaw with you.

but since he doesn't know what the heck Google is

The person who cannot seem to use Google somehow knows that another person doesn't know what it is? That's a little hard to believe.

Nope, he totally ignored it, not having the faintest idea about the question and how to answer it.

More TDS fueled conjecture.

[Wondergirl]

Yeah. You just choose not to. Ignorance fueled by TDS is a terrible flaw with you.

The person who cannot seem to use Google somehow knows that another person doesn't know what it is? That's a little hard to believe.

More TDS fueled conjecture.

Goodbye!

[jlisenbe]

I'm sorry to hear that, but you need to learn that your posts here will be examined and reflected on. It reminds me of the old saying, "If you can't stand the heat, then get out of the kitchen." And that's not to mention that you reply in a straightforward fashion as well. Note below.

Ha ha ha ha ha!!! "he pivoted".

Apparently, you haven't read that website either. And must be MAGAites.

I cannot believe how two educated and usually sane men like you and tomder don't see through Trump. Even our cat howls in agony when he's on tv.

I would encourage you to hang tough and defend your views.

[tomder55]

Dems still trying to gaslight on guns . To prove he is an everyday American man ;Missouri Dem candidate Lucas Kunce ;who is 'gunning " for Josh Hawley's Senate seat was taking target practice as a range with former Repub ;former Kangaroo court member Adam Kinsinger . Problem was that he almost killed a reporter by taking shots at a steel target at close range. The ricochet wounded a tv reporter .

KC reporter struck by bullet fragment at Lucas Kunce shooting range campaign event