[jlisenbe]

So Obama, Pelosi, Schumer, et al were wrong to insist he step aside? It's got to be one or the other.

[tomder55]

gets better when you see Tampon Tim's comments . Stolen valor ? Nah just bad grammar

[tomder55]

Just a quick recap

The DOJ had Hunter's laptop. Despite that they actively went along with the fiction that it was Russian disinformation.
Trump's Attorney General Bill Barr decided that they would not act on it because of the so called Justice Dept 60 day rule about election interference.

Attorney General Memorandum for All Department of Justice Employees Concerning Election Year Sensitivities (March 9, 2012)
Barr and senior department officials relayed the instructions in conversations with prosecutors because of their concern that it would affect the elections . They ignored a Repub lawmaker's request to appoint a special prosecutor.

Of course that did not keep James Comey from taking all types of steps in 2016 that could be construed as election interference.

So yesterday .Hunter confessed to tax evasion . What he did as the prosecution spelled out was taking Quid Pro Joe bribes from America's enemies . It is well known that if the public knew of the information in the laptop Quid would not have won.

HHRG-118-FD00-20230720-SD011.pdf (congress.gov)

So does the same rule apply to Trump ? Apparently not.

Prosecutor for the Jan 6 DC case Jack Smith filed sealed documents to presiding Judge Tanya Chutkan.
Jack Smith Files Mystery Sealed Document in Trump Case - Newsweek

Trump wants hearings on the case to resume after the election. But the judge has set hearings for next week. The judge admits that the formal trial will not happen before the election.
But that is not the point. The Dem's game plan is to have a steady stream of allegations made public during the election cycle.

Donald Trump’s attorney John Lauro said this a “sensitive time” with the presidential election approaching, suggesting that the government’s proposed response to the Supreme Court’s immunity decision would be too fast and unfair to Trump.
Judge Tanya S. Chutkan sternly responded that she is not taking the November election into account as she decides on how the case should proceed.

“This court is not concerned with the electoral schedule,” Chutkan said. “That’s not something I’m going to consider.”
Lauro then said that courts are not supposed to get involved with the electoral process.
“I am definitely not getting drawn into the electoral process,” Chutkan responded.
Lauro seemed unpersuaded: “This process is unfair, particularly during the sensitive time we are in.”

Judge, attorneys in Trump’s Jan. 6 case spar over what happens next, and when (msn.com)
Smith's packet includes information that has not been released to the Trump defense team. True or false the judge can release them at will.

[Wondergirl]

She doesn't regret lying to the American people about Joe's OBVIOUS cognitive decline .

What about Trump's age and perpetual cognitive deficiencies?

Can't wait
For the debate!
Will it be a bait-
And-switch fate?
Scratch your pate
Now, how will it rate?

[tomder55]

the whataboutism non-reply News flash Trump was not President Joe was running the country and the VEEPS only constitutional role is to step in if the President is not capable.

Instead Kam the Sham said Joe was the sharpest tool in the shed . Even after the debate exposed him to the nation ,she still lied about it .

[jlisenbe]

What about Trump's age and perpetual cognitive deficiencies?

What a strange comment. It amounts to, "I'm so concerned about Trump's cognitive problems, so I'm going to vote for Biden." Really? It's like saying, "I'm so concerned about my low pay that I'm going to take a different job for even less pay."

Oh well. Does the word "weird" apply?

[Wondergirl]

What a strange comment. It amounts to, "I'm so concerned about Trump's cognitive problems, so I'm going to vote for Biden." Really? It's like saying, "I'm so concerned about my low pay that I'm going to take a different job for even less pay."

Oh well. Does the word "weird" apply?

And you weren't criticizing Biden for his verbal and mental deficiencies??? That's why I'll be voting for a younger and more mentally healthy and politically astute and less money grubbing candidate who isn't planning to be our dictator for life.

[tomder55]

All she wants to do is take away out liberties

She openly called for social media sites to censor. As AG in California she forced conservative non-profits to turn over their IRS records in an attempt to get their donors . She then posted them "accidently " SCOTUS had to put a stop to it .

19-251 Americans For Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta (07/01/2021) (supremecourt.gov)

She said she wanted to confiscate guns.
She violated due process as California's AG


So besides some basic guaranteed freedoms she wants to scrap she would not be a dictator .

And Catholics could not serve as judges because their faith opposes killing babies . Judicial nominee Brian Buescher was a member of the Knights of Columbus. ;a fraternal organization in the Catholic church that does charity . JFK was a member . Senator Kam questioned him about his association with the group. Her question was , “Were you aware that the Knights of Columbus opposed a woman’s right to choose when you joined the organization? ;as if that was a disqualifier .

[jlisenbe]

And you weren't criticizing Biden for his verbal and mental deficiencies???

You completely missed the point.

That's why I'll be voting for a younger and more mentally healthy and politically astute and less money grubbing candidate who isn't planning to be our dictator for life.

You mean the one who slept with a married man in order to get a plum political assignment? Is that what it means to be "politically astute"? And perhaps she will someday explain how she ended up as the democrat nominee for president when she didn't have the vote of a single delegate.