[Vacuum7]

An FBI lawyer is under criminal investigation for altering documents related to the Carter Page Surveillance Fisa Warrant: This means he was trying to "fool" the Federal Judge who had to review the "evidence" that was presented to him in order to generate the warrant.

WOW! THIS IS BAD NEWS FOR THE MUELLER BUNCH AND DEMOS!!! Do you have any idea how much of a bastard John Durham can be once he gets on your arse?

[talaniman]

You mean this?

[Vacuum7]

The left had to resort to illegal methods to try and "get" Trump: They screwed up!

[tomder55]

you aint seen nothing yet . Barr and Durham are beginning to focus on the big movers of the Russia-gate hoax ..... Brennan and Clapper . Comey will come off as a patsy when the final story is told

Even the NY TImes in October hinted that Brennan tricked the FBI into opening the probe into the Trump campaign . "The F.B.I. did not use information from the C.I.A. in opening the Russia investigation, former American officials said. But agents’ views on Russia’s election interference operation crystallized by mid-August, after the C.I.A. director at the time, John O. Brennan, shared intelligence with Mr. Comey about it."

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/24/u...stigation.html

[paraclete]

So we have ring side seats to the circus of the decade

[talaniman]

This circus came to town in 2015 when the dufus announced his candidacy for president Clete, and this is but another act. We have never had this much drama in politics at this level for so long, No signs it will abate any time soon, not even after the election next year if the dufus survives impeachment and gets re elected.

I see it as another example of the dufus colludeding with Vlad for Russian legitimacy. All I can say is stay tuned or tune out.

[paraclete]

I think I'll tune out

[talaniman]

I hope for the best he gets removed, or plan for the worst he get's re elected. Either way I still will live through it and thrive God willing. I can't control it either way, so I tune out when I'm tired of the crap, and tune in when I get bored or curious. My life has never revolved around politics, or what they are doing.

[tomder55]

aint going to happen . Madam Mim's stunt displayed to the whole country how illegit the whole unconstitutional process was that they invented . They reduced a process that the framers intended for the most serious law breaking to a Parliamentary no confidence vote. One after the other they talked about how somber they were ;how they have a heavy heart that they were going to vote to impeach. Then when the votes were recorded :Madam Mim had to stare them down before they almost broke into a Snoopy dance . Her refusal to move the impeachment over to the Senate for trial is an obstruction of Congress....the very thing they are charging the President with .

[tomder55]

I just figured it out. Trump came out in favor of an impeachment trial so naturally the Dems oppose it.

[talaniman]

aint going to happen . Madam Mim's stunt displayed to the whole country how illegit the whole unconstitutional process was that they invented . They reduced a process that the framers intended for the most serious law breaking to a Parliamentary no confidence vote. One after the other they talked about how somber they were ;how they have a heavy heart that they were going to vote to impeach. Then when the votes were recorded :Madam Mim had to stare them down before they almost broke into a Snoopy dance . Her refusal to move the impeachment over to the Senate for trial is an obstruction of Congress....the very thing they are charging the President with .

Nice spin Tom, I've been hearing that all morning from repubs, but fact remains there are no rules for transferring the impeachment articles to the senate. I expected the whining and complaining about Pelosi's decision, nothing new there since the process has been under fire from you guys since it was announced. Guess we can live with a few more weeks of it. Doesn't stop MM and the senate from preparing for it though does it? Naw! They KNOW it's a coming.

A mere distraction from the GOP allowing the dufus to stall and instruct the impeachment inquiry in the first place of which they said NOTHING! Good for the goose as they say.

I just figured it out. Trump came out in favor of an impeachment trial so naturally the Dems oppose it.

He also said he supports his boy's testifying at the trial and I suppose you believe that too. He expects a quick vote to dismiss in the senate. Not this year hehehe!

[tomder55]

Guess we can live with a few more weeks of it.

If I were Yertle I would convene a trial without the House turning it over . I would swear in all the Senators and make them sit there "a few more weeks " while the campaign in Iowa is in full swing. Warren ,Sanders ,Booker ,Klobuchar would just love hanging out on the Senate floor as jurors while they wait for Madam Mim. I don't know why you think this works in the Dems favor .If I were the Dems I would want to put that shameful embarrassing episode behind them .

Just as the Constitution gives the Senate no say in how the House conducts an impeachment ;it also gives the House no say on how a trial is conducted The only restriction to the Senate's total control is that the Chief Justice presides .But Roberts is constrained by the Senate rules.

[talaniman]

Moscow Mitch can do whatever he wants when they get back from holiday break, and until then the GOP can say whatever they want. I don't think she cares about that.

[paraclete]

You are right, she doesn't care

[talaniman]

Why should see? It's only a procedural process thing.

[tomder55]

I see it as another example of the dufus colludeding with Vlad for Russian legitimacy.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...-u-s-sanctions

[talaniman]

I'll just wait until the dufus signs something from the congress against Vlad. Wake me up when that happens.

[paraclete]

I'll just wait until the dufus signs something from the congress against Vlad. Wake me up when that happens.

You mean you dont subscribe to the Comey stuffup

[talaniman]

From Comey to the Ukraine ambassador, firing people for nefarious personal schemes is very objectionable.

[paraclete]

From Comey to the Ukraine ambassador, firing people for nefarious personal schemes is very objectionable.

Yes Trump included