Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #141

    Feb 26, 2015, 02:54 AM
    The issue here is the bloated and over powerful Federal Bureaucracy . Changes of this magnitute should not be made by bureaucratic decree. That is why we have elected branches .
    As for the "oligarchy " we shall see. It the 2016 race is between Evita and Jebbabubba then I'll be more inclined to agree. If it is a race between Scott Walker and Elizabeth Warren then that will be one worthy of our attention.
    Catsmine's Avatar
    Catsmine Posts: 3,826, Reputation: 739
    Pest Control Expert
     
    #142

    Feb 26, 2015, 04:09 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    If it is a race between Scott Walker and Elizabeth Warren then that will be one worthy of our attention.
    If Walker gets the nomination I'll be shocked enough to look at Republicans again.
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #143

    Feb 26, 2015, 05:24 AM
    No elected leader from any party will reduce the size of your government. I think you need to accept that as a given.
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #144

    Feb 26, 2015, 05:36 AM
    I would be happy if they reduce the time elected officials got paid for NOT working.
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #145

    Feb 26, 2015, 05:53 AM
    I would be happy if they tied their pay to productivity
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #146

    Feb 26, 2015, 10:18 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    No elected leader from any party will reduce the size of your government. I think you need to accept that as a given.
    as the doctor said "I can prescribe the cure . I can't force the patient to take the medicine" .
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #147

    Feb 26, 2015, 10:22 AM
    All of us can carry on about panaceas that will never happen, that's easy. After a while though it sounds like
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #148

    Feb 26, 2015, 02:35 PM
    Which dead horse is that, I would have thought you have a president desperately seeking a legacy since whatever he has done will be torn down when he leaves

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Why NOT to nationalize health care [ 27 Answers ]

American Thinker: Medical Care is a Successful and Growing Industry, not a Liability Why would we deliberately kill the one area of our economy that is still PRODUCING, still making a profit, and still creating jobs? Can anyone give me a good economic reason to mess up the one sector of the...

Good news: Obama could control internet [ 9 Answers ]

Congress has proposed giving the president broad discretion over shutting down internet traffic and the Secretary of Commerce the power to collect data “without regard to any provision of law, regulation, rule, or policy restricting such access.” And you guys thought Bush’s (now Obama’s)...

Videos won't play on internet or show photos on psp internet [ 1 Answers ]

I am having trouble with my psp not showing videos or photos on the internet, can someone please tell me why?:o

Dems, Obama to nationalize 401(k) Plans? [ 9 Answers ]

The Dems in congress are considering nationalizing 401(k) plans: Yes, the Democrats are here to help you. Do you want the same guys that offered us "affordable housing" managing your (formerly) voluntary private retirement savings?


View more questions Search