 |
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 18, 2013, 02:33 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
I never said ID was science. You say Darwinism is science even though it has more holes in it than swiss cheese . If your idea of science is Darwinism is fact then folks like you would not get off the ground. btw ;building a rocket ship is an engineering feat .
Yes in the end even Darwin said he was wrong, pity he wasn't more precise or scientific in that statement. Evolution is theory, AGW is theory
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 19, 2013, 08:11 AM
|
|
Yes in the end even Darwin said he was wrong
That's one of those urban myths:
Darwin
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 19, 2013, 08:23 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by NeedKarma
That's one of those urban myths:
Darwin
Wow, you used Answersingenesis as a reliable source?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 19, 2013, 08:26 AM
|
|
Darwin was well and healthy when he spoke of concerns about the lack of transitional fossils which would've proved his hypothesis .He hoped in the future that some would be found. But that never happened
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 19, 2013, 08:35 AM
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 19, 2013, 09:04 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by NeedKarma
I'm not the one who put the myth out there, just surprised you would give that group any credibility, them being a leading proponent of creationism and all.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 19, 2013, 09:20 AM
|
|
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 19, 2013, 11:07 AM
|
|
them being a leading proponent of creationism and all.
So if they say it's a myth it's a pretty good chance it is. ;-)
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 19, 2013, 11:08 AM
|
|
Science and the Bible
The Bible is not a science book, yet it is scientifically accurate. We are not aware of any scientific evidence that contradicts the Bible.
Oh dear.. that's funny. :D
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Sep 19, 2013, 11:21 AM
|
|
Is this a push to replace science books in schools with the bible?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 19, 2013, 02:42 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
Is this a push to replace science books in schools with the bible?
You could do worse but of course you would be a little lacking on detail but some interesting experiments could be held
Healing
Speaking to rocks
Parting seas
Walking on water
Stopping time
Fighting battles with musicians
All of which proves you have to have God with you if you are going to do these things
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 20, 2013, 08:05 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
Is this a push to replace science books in schools with the bible?
There is a place for both, it is the exclusion of one in favour of the other that is the evil
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Sep 20, 2013, 08:21 PM
|
|
Would you feel the same if it was a bible from another religion? There are many you know.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 20, 2013, 10:55 PM
|
|
I'm not against the study of comparative religion as long as none are deliberately excluded.
It too is in the category of there are alternative views. You see evolution is an alternative view and should be taught in comparative religion
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 21, 2013, 01:24 AM
|
|
You see evolution is an alternative view and should be taught in comparative religion
Except that by definition religions are based on faith whereas evolution is based on observable facts.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 21, 2013, 02:00 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by NeedKarma
Except that by definition religions are based on faith whereas evolution is based on observable facts.
Evolution is as much based on faith as any religion since its central tenents remain unproven
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 21, 2013, 02:21 AM
|
|
I guess everything is faith to you, facts can be discarded.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 21, 2013, 03:55 AM
|
|
I'm waiting for the facts to be presented
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 21, 2013, 03:59 AM
|
|
Education is a good start.
|
|
 |
Junior Member
|
|
Sep 21, 2013, 04:17 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by paraclete
The article is not accurate in a couple of areas in relation to the Big Bang. Firstly, the theory itself doesn't say anything about a single point in the universe where the Big Bang occurred.
Secondly, the theory does explain why there is a uniform temperature. The"lack of time" idea is bound up in the so called, "inflationary period" of expansion.
The other point worth mentioning is that evolution of the universe and biological evolution are not the same subject matter. In other words, the methodology used in biological evolution can not be used when trying to explain the evolution of the universe.
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Science fiction movie or television show with robot religion
[ 0 Answers ]
Perhaps 40+years ago (I'm 57) I remember watching a show on television, which may have been an old movie or even an early television show like The Outer Limits.
The setting was very 1930's / art deco.
The story began with two "upper class" women talking breezily about the decline in human...
Science and Religion
[ 2 Answers ]
A question was raised at a different post which concerns the nature of science and religion. The contributor was largely asking why can't science and religion compromise on certain issues? The standard response to that is, they can't because they deal with entirely different subject matter....
Science and Religion.
[ 275 Answers ]
Science says one thing and religion another... There are several conflicts like the theory of evolution for example. Religion needs faith in what is unseen and science needs facts, evidence and proofs. The question I'd like to ask is: Can science and religion co-exist?
Religion and Science Fiction
[ 15 Answers ]
The year is 3080, a war that has been going on since the satan was cast out of heaven still rages. The worshipers of the one true god, chirstians, muslims, jews, budditists etc. have forgotten their differences and united under one banner, the G.S.S. (Galactic Star Systems.) both human and alien.
...
View more questions
Search
|