 |
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Feb 14, 2013, 05:15 PM
|
|
Harris is dead... his luck ran out . Militias are one clause of the 2nd . The other one ;quite explicit is the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Feb 14, 2013, 06:25 PM
|
|
You keep selectively quoting the clause without putting it in context. It is as if by saying it enough you make your point of veiw absolute truth. The point of the clause is to maintain a militia, back in the days when they couldn't afford a standing army or police force, and in any case, there was the tyranny of distance to consider. As I have said before Tom, ad nausium, these are different days
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Feb 14, 2013, 06:34 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by paraclete
You keep selectively quoting the clause without putting it in context. It is as if by saying it enough you make your point of veiw absolute truth. The point of the clause is to maintain a militia, back in the days when they couldn't afford a standing army or police force, and in any case, there was the tyranny of distance to consider. As I have said before Tom, ad nausium, these are different days
They HAD an army back in the day... the Militia were private citizens... more like the national guard.
And it specified BOTH the right to have a Militia AND the right of citizens to keep and bear arms.
By that argument.. were does it grant the people the freedom of speech? You can't define the first one way and the second under different criteria.
Not if you expect to have any credibility.
|
|
 |
Jobs & Parenting Expert
|
|
Feb 14, 2013, 06:41 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by smoothy
the right of citizens to keep and bear arms.
And their reason to say that was?
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Feb 14, 2013, 06:47 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Wondergirl
And their reason to say that was?
To prevent a Tyrannical government from returning like the one they fought a war to get away from in England.
An armed populace would never allow it... or at least before the moral decay of certain groups that are too lazy to move to a country that has such a government that they rather have an oppressive government here.
Gorilla warfare was important in the Revolutionary war... it wasn't just the Regular army fighting it.
|
|
 |
Jobs & Parenting Expert
|
|
Feb 14, 2013, 06:51 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by smoothy
To prevent a Tyrannical government from returning like the one they fought a war to get away from in England.
(I was writing more and accidentally kicked myself offline.)
And who will lead this effort? (Seems like the Republicans in the House are doing a great job of stymieing things minus the guns. Our system of government works quite well.)
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Feb 14, 2013, 06:54 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Wondergirl
(I was writing more and accidentally kicked myself offline.)
And who will lead this effort? (Seems like the Republicans in the House are doing a great job of stymieing things minus the guns. Our system of government works quite well.)
Don't NEED a leader to be effective... the need might never arise.. but the way things are heading the last few years.. there likely will be.
|
|
 |
Jobs & Parenting Expert
|
|
Feb 14, 2013, 06:59 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by smoothy
Don't NEED a leader to be effective...the need might never arise..but the way things are heading the last few years..there likely will be.
If the right would get their act together and do it right (ha ha, that's funny), they could clean up the place. Unfortunately, I'm not in politics to tell them how to do this and be their leader. (Yes, they desperately need a leader.)
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Feb 14, 2013, 07:05 PM
|
|
Well... the sad thing is so few people understand the old saying "...those who forget history, are doomed to repeat it."
Gun control and confiscations preceded the worst atrocities in the last several hundred years. Yes the British tried it here before the beginning of the revolutionary war too... for the same reason as all the others... an unarmed populace is a populace that can be oppressed.
|
|
 |
Jobs & Parenting Expert
|
|
Feb 14, 2013, 07:07 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by smoothy
an unarmed populace is a populace that can be oppressed.
Well, the US sure has that covered!
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Feb 14, 2013, 07:12 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Wondergirl
Well, the US sure has that covered!
For now they do... The Obama worshipers want to impose gun confiscation.. (they have actually said that much) Barbara Fienstein is on record for just one. So Obama can declare himself emperor and throw out the constitution.
There is no other justification for disarming the people.
No I don't implicitly trust any politician.
|
|
 |
Jobs & Parenting Expert
|
|
Feb 14, 2013, 07:17 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by smoothy
For now they do....The Obama worshipers want to impose gun confiscation..(they have actually said that much) Barbara Fienstein is on record for just one. So Obama can declare himself emperor and throw out the constitution.
That is simply not true. No one is going to disarm anyone or confiscate guns. There is no way anyone could recall 300+M guns and get away with it.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Feb 14, 2013, 07:23 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Wondergirl
That is simply not true. No one is going to disarm anyone or confiscate guns. There is no way anyone could recall 300+M guns and get away with it.
They are dumb enough to try to do it... many of them will do anything their Messiah Lord Obama tells them to do... they already believe everything he tells them to believe. Reminds me of the Followers of Pol Pot. And Mao. Look at how many people revered Stalin... even after killing over 20 million of his own people.
I didn't say they could get away with it without serious bloodshed... but they aren't smart enough to understand how seriously most of us take our second amendment rights.
I know very few people that would hand over anything, OR even register anything (the only reason for that is to know who has what so they can go after them)... and quite a few that if they went door to door trying... a lot of them won't be going home again.
|
|
 |
Jobs & Parenting Expert
|
|
Feb 14, 2013, 07:31 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by smoothy
They are dumb enough to try to do it........many of them will do anything their Messiah Lord Obama tells them to do
He won't be telling anyone to do that, now or ever. And he won't allow anyone else to do it in his stead.
You've got lots of "them"s and "they"s in your post, Not sure who this paranoia is leveled at.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Feb 14, 2013, 07:36 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Wondergirl
He won't be telling anyone to do that, now or ever. And he won't allow anyone else to do it in his stead.
You've got lots of "them"s and "they"s in your post,. Not sure who this paranoia is leveled at.
The sheeple that believed the propaganda that expect their free Obama money now...
You didn't listen to any of his recent anti-gun rants, have you? He very much IS calling for taking away our guns... he and his minions have been very explicit about that.
|
|
 |
Jobs & Parenting Expert
|
|
Feb 14, 2013, 07:52 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by smoothy
You didn't listen to any of his recent anti-gun rants, have you? He very much IS calling for taking away our guns...he and his minions have been very explicit about that.
I've listened to every word he has said. Do not be afraid.
And I am not a sheeple.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Feb 14, 2013, 08:00 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by smoothy
For now they do....The Obama worshipers want to impose gun confiscation..(they have actually said that much) Barbara Fienstein is on record for just one. So Obama can declare himself emperor and throw out the constitution.
There is no other justification for disarming the people.
No I don't implicitly trust any politician.
Have you stopped to think that the motivation is to protect the people, to protect those who cannot protect themselves. Obama doesn't want to declare himself Emperor and even if he did, an armed population will help him, not hinder him. As soon as there is an armed insurrection, he has the mandate to declare martial law. Twice in your history an armed population has led to a civil war, with devastating consequences. On one occasion the rebels won, on the other they did not. Get out of the romance and into reality
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Feb 14, 2013, 08:02 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by paraclete
have you stopped to think that the motivation is to protect the people, to protect those who cannot protect themselves. Obama doesn't want to declare himself Emperor and even if he did, an armed population will help him, not hinder him. As soon as there is an armed insurrection, he has the mandate to declare martial law. Twice in your history an armed population has led to a civil war, with devistating consequences. On one occasion the rebels won, on the other they did not. get out of the romance and into reality
There is NO legitimate motive to circumvent the Bill of Rights or the Constitution.
Any such action is nothing short of Treason.
But then... you've never lived in a nation with a real Constitution, one that wasn't written in pencil.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Feb 14, 2013, 08:10 PM
|
|
Is that right, well it happens that the Constitution of this nation was written having due reference to what had transpired on the other side of the Pacific. We took the good parts of your Constitution and left the rest, and we don't suffer from lead poisoning here. Strange that?
Our pencil constitution, as you put it, has allowed us to throw out a bad government on its ear, mid term, something your constitution would never allow you to accomplish. We don't spend our time debating our rights, we don't spend our time stumbling from one election to the next, We get on with what is important not batting a depression caused by, guess who? The people with all the rights
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Feb 14, 2013, 08:18 PM
|
|
Right... a constitution written in pencil... one that any group of nuts that get enough people elected can change on a whim...
Meaning anything written on it.. isn't worth the paper its written on if it can be changed so easily...
Wait until the next bunch decides to do away with elections because the people can't be trusted to vote... you know... like the people can't be trusted to have guns.
You don't battle about rights because you have none... except what they decide to let you have at any given moment.
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
80's Cop comedy. Cop thinks he has fatal disease so takes risks? Title?
[ 1 Answers ]
Should be an easy one for the experts, title should explain it all, but cop thinks he has fatal disease and 6 months to live, (because of mix up at doctor), also if he dies in action his family gets more money, so he takes many crazy risks during his work as a cop. Sorry can't even picture the...
Charged with attempt murder of cop
[ 2 Answers ]
On march 29th of 2007,icame home from work at 2:30pm on anice sunny day.I picked up a6 pack of beer and was going to fix aproblem with my well.I'm a plumber.I came in the house and could not find the keys to my garage,so I asked the girl that was living with me at the time where they were,she had...
2 part movie, murderer dressed as cop or maybe was cop
[ 1 Answers ]
Can't think of the name. Was a two nighter, 4 hours. Murderer had a police uniform on, so people trusted him. Remember a winnebago ( I think) was the getaway for people that had been kidnapped by bad cop. Large mean dogs also, dobermans, I think. Bad guy sort of looked like mean doc on scrubs,...
Murder movie about a cop that is a killer?
[ 1 Answers ]
I'm not really sure if it was supposed to be a movie but I assume it was. I saw this about a year or two ago. I remember towards the beginning of it the murderer (who could not be seen because it was not known who he was) said "We were only 12 at the time, no one would have suspected us." That...
View more questions
Search
|