 |
|
|
 |
New Member
|
|
Jul 25, 2012, 06:18 PM
|
|
I was not properly served a summons
I was sharing a house with a couple of other people in California, I moved out in July 2007 and some how even though I no longer resided there, and was never notified of the court case at all, the owner still got a judgement against me in Nov 2007. I had no idea I was even being sued or had been sued, I only found out that he had won a judgement against me through my credit check last week. I can prove that I was not living there at the time. Any advice on how to proceed ?
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Jul 25, 2012, 06:21 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by heather7710
I was sharing a house with a couple of other people in California, I moved out in July 2007 and some how even though I no longer resided there, and was never notified of the court case at all, the owner still got a judgement against me in Nov 2007. I had no idea I was even being sued or had been sued, I only found out that he had won a judgement against me through my credit check last week. I can prove that I was not living there at the time. Any advice on how to proceed ?
Someone could have been served in your place and stead, accepted service for you. You need to look at the file and find out who/when/where was served. The fact that you didn't live there doesn't mean that there isn't an allegation you were served somewhere else OR someone was served "for" you.
|
|
 |
Home Repair & Remodeling Expert
|
|
Jul 25, 2012, 06:21 PM
|
|
Were you on a lease still in effect at the time of the suit? It really doesn't matter if you lived there or not, it matters only if you were on the lease, even a non-resident co-signer could be sued
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Jul 25, 2012, 09:16 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by ballengerb1
Were you on a lease still in effect at the time of the suit? It really doesn't matter if you lived there or not, it matters only if you were on the lease, even a non-resident co-signer could be sued
Here.
*Throws copy of Calfornia Code of Civil Procedure at Ballengerb*
Show me. It would be, I imagine, in Title 5, Chapter 4.
|
|
 |
Computer Expert and Renaissance Man
|
|
Jul 26, 2012, 04:01 AM
|
|
There are two issues here. One whether service was done properly. And it you check the link AK posted there are a variety of ways that service might have been done properly and you might not have been informed.. The other is whether they had a right to sue. To answer the second, we would need to know whether you moved out with proper notice and before a lease expired.
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Was not properly served
[ 20 Answers ]
Received a text messages at 10:17 am stating I have court in maywood il a 9:30 am for court because I'm being evicted. I had no idea I had court nor did my land lord even bother to leave a summons or note on my door. Just sent a text from the lady upstairs reminding me of court date. She stated Ms...
Properly served
[ 2 Answers ]
In Illinois what does "properly served" mean? Is regular mail, not certified, considered "properly served"?
Properly served summons
[ 1 Answers ]
A corporation general manager was personally delevered a summons and signed the acknowledgement of receipt in behalf of the corporation; he also signed three other acknowledgement of receipts for 3 of its employees who work directly underneath him at the same job site. On the summons directed to...
Was I properly served
[ 17 Answers ]
Someone else signed for papers in 2005 and now I am going to court for not paying. I never knew anything about it. The judge said that I needed proof that I wasn't properly served. If someone else signed,wad I properly served?
View more questions
Search
|