 |
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2010, 08:16 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by morgaine300
Can you explain why?
No... Maybe unequal since she or he stirred it.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2010, 08:46 PM
|
|
There is more white in the white.
If 5 mL of white was moved to the red, it was undiluted.
If 5mL of the red with white was moved over to the red, it wasn't 5mL of red.. it was mostly red, but a little white back.
More white is in the white.
***edited... proved to be wrong in my later posts***
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2010, 08:50 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by kp2171
there is more white in the white.
if 5 mL of white was moved to the red, it was undiluted.
if 5mL of the red with white was moved over to the red, it wasnt 5mL of red.. it was mostly red, but a little white back.
more white is in the white.
Smart alec:) How did you know that and is it the right?
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2010, 09:04 PM
|
|
Oops. Crap. wrong.
What worked in my head is wrong on paper.
First... you must assume that both transfers are equal in volume... that exactly the same volume was moved in both cases.
Then...
Lets pretend we have 100 mL of each wine in two glasses.
You take out 5 mL of white to the red. That's 105 mLs of wine in the "red" glass, 100 mL red with 5 mL white. Its 95.238% red.
Then you take 5 mL of this mixture to the white.
You add to 95 mL white 4.762 red and 0.228 mL white... for a total of 100 mL wine, but the composition is different... its just 95.228% white...
The reason is you are adding a mostly red aliquot to a lesser volume of white. The lesser volume of white is what got me mentally.
Pooh.
Shouldve done the math first.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2010, 09:06 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by kp2171
oops. crap. wrong.
what worked in my head is wrong on paper.
first... you must assume that both transfers are equal in volume... that exactly the same volume was moved in both cases.
then...
lets pretend we have 100 mL of each wine in two glasses.
you take out 5 mL of white to the red. thats 105 mLs of wine in the "red" glass, 100 mL red with 5 mL white. its 95.238% red.
then you take 5 mL of this mixture to the white.
you add to 95 mL white 4.776 red and 0.224 mL white... for a total of 100 mL wine, but the composition is different... its just 95.224% white...
the reason is you are adding in a mostly red aliquot to a lesser volume.
pooh.
shouldve done the math first.
The stirring has something to do with it.
|
|
 |
Pets Expert
|
|
Aug 13, 2010, 09:07 PM
|
|
My head hurts.
Can we do an English riddle/problem? Math is not my strong point, and no, I'm not willing to learn. ;)
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2010, 09:10 PM
|
|
So... I was wrong at first... the red is more red percentage wise.
Unless the transfers weren't perfectly equal. Forgot to ask if a proper dialed pipette was used.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2010, 09:12 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by kp2171
so... i was wrong at first... the red is more red percentage wise.
unless the transfers werent perfectly equal. forgot to ask if a proper dialed pipette was used.
Analytical or what?:p
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2010, 09:13 PM
|
|
The stirring ensures consistent concentration.
If I add a little something to a lot of something else and don't stir, I cannot take a sample of it and have it be representative of the whole.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2010, 09:14 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by kp2171
the stirring ensures consistent concentration.
if i add a little something to a lot of something else and dont stir, i cannot take a sample of it and have it be representative of the whole.
But wouldn't some of the wine evaporate in the stirring? Or does wine evaporate?:confused:
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2010, 09:16 PM
|
|
Anyone who was worked with analytical chemical glassware knows they must mix and mix and mix to ensure proper, uh, mixing... and therefore, consistent concentration throughout the sample, no matter where you sample.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2010, 09:17 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by kp2171
anyone who was worked with analytical chemical glassware knows they must mix and mix and mix to ensure proper, uh, mixing... and therefore, consistent concentration throughout the sample, no matter where you sample.
Okay Bill Nye,:p what's the answer?:)
|
|
 |
Pets Expert
|
|
Aug 13, 2010, 09:17 PM
|
|
The only thing I know is that I now want a glass of wine. I don't care if it's shaken, stirred, or mixed, I just want it in a glass. :)
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2010, 09:18 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Altenweg
The only thing I know is that I now want a glass of wine. I don't care if it's shaken, stirred, or mixed, I just want it in a glass. :)
I knew you were going to say that:eek:
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2010, 09:21 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Kitkat22
But wouldn't some of the wine evaporate in the stirring? Or does wine evaporate?:confused:
Ethanol doesn't evaporate that fast, and in water, it forms an azeotrope that boils off at a higher bp than pure... but I'm pretty damn sure this riddle has nothing to do with azeotropic mixtures...
|
|
 |
Pets Expert
|
|
Aug 13, 2010, 09:21 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Kitkat22
I knew you were gonna say that:eek:
Crap! Am I that predictable? :eek:
So much for being an original. ;)
|
|
 |
Pets Expert
|
|
Aug 13, 2010, 09:22 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by kp2171
ethanol doesnt evaporate that fast, and in water, it forms an azeotrope that boils off at a higher bp than pure... but im pretty damn sure this riddle has nothing to do with azeotropic mixtures...
You lost me at azeotrope.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2010, 09:23 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Altenweg
You lost me at azeotrope.
I think it's a big furry animal. Azeotrope.:rolleyes:
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2010, 09:24 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Kitkat22
Okay Bill Nye,:p what's the answer?:)
My first answer, more white in the white, was wrong.
It was wrong because I didn't crunch the numbers.
The fact that the white was a lower volume added to was the difference.
...
Got to love us chemists.
Our work makes for great party fodder.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 13, 2010, 09:26 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by kp2171
my first answer, more white in the white, was wrong.
it was wrong because i didnt crunch the numbers.
the fact that the white was a lower volume added to was the difference.
...
gotta love us chemists.
our work makes for great party fodder.
She said they were the same amount. How can a white wine and red wine in the same size glasses not have the same volume?
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Riddle what it mean
[ 7 Answers ]
Stop,look and always see me. Try to touch , you cannot feel me. Never moving, never closer. Always moving, the endless poser. What am I?
I need help with a riddle
[ 2 Answers ]
There is a woman who needs to get three things across a waterfall corn feed, a chicken, and a fox but she can only take them one at a time. And the fox can't stay with the chicken because he will eat the chicken and the chicken can't stay with the corn feed because it will eat the corn feed. How...
I've got a riddle for you.
[ 22 Answers ]
Einstein's Riddle:
Einstein has been widely credited online with the following riddle, and with the claim that 98% of the world could not solve it. But several of our NIEHS scientists were able to solve it, and they said it is not all that hard if you pay attention and are very patient. Give it a...
Riddle me this
[ 4 Answers ]
There are 10 pails. 9 of them contain non-poisonous pills while only 1 contains poisonous pills.All of the pails and pills are of the same colour.How to differentiate the one with the poisonous pills.Non-poisonous pills each weighs 10 gram while poisonous pills each weighs 9 gram.You can only use...
A little riddle
[ 2 Answers ]
If you seen the batman movie with riddler in it, don't answer this please. However, for those of you who haven't seen it, or don't remember seeeing it, here is a riddle from the movie:
We are 5 of an everyday sort,
You can find us in
A Tennis Court
What are we?
View more questions
Search
|