[NeedKarma]

Even the NY Times comes out with an admission on the agenda, saying Obamacare is "the federal government’s biggest attack on economic inequality since inequality began rising more than three decades ago." In other words, Obama's big step in wealth redistribution.

"NY Slimes", can't believe a word they print, right? Unless you believe it. It is to laugh.

[speechlesstx]

"NY Slimes", can't believe a word they print, right? Unless you believe it. It is to laugh.

NK, for such a smart guy you sure seem awfully clueless at times.

[NeedKarma]

NK, for such a smart guy you sure seem awfully clueless at times.

Really? Why do you always call it the "NY Slimes"?

https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/politi...tml#post612820

https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/curren...tml#post909419

https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/curren...tml#post909613

https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/curren...ml#post1515420

[speechlesstx]

Really? Why do you always call it the "NY Slimes"?

Yeah well, if you'd look at the post that prompted this I wrote "Even the NY Times," not "Slimes." That was you misquoting me. Aren't you tired of being humiliated when trying to make me look bad?

[NeedKarma]

Yeah well, if you'd look at the post that prompted this I wrote "Even the NY Times," not "Slimes." That was you misquoting me. Aren't you tired of being humiliated when trying to make me look bad?

I think you miss the point here. You're pointing to the NY Times as someone who got it right when you routinely call it the Slimes because they don't get it right. You're OK with it this time because it fits your agenda. That's the hypocrisy we're used to from the neo-cons.

[speechlesstx]

I think you miss the point here. You're pointing to the NY Times as someone who got it right when you routinely call it the Slimes because they don't get it right. You're ok with it this time because it fits your agenda. That's the hypocrisy we're used to from the neo-cons.

No, you're emissing the point. You misquoted me in an attempt to smear me. Just admit it dude.

[NeedKarma]

Wow, you've lost it.

[speechlesstx]

You misquote me and I've lost it? I pity you...

[excon]

She said that the true agenda is to redefine the role of government .

Hello again, tom:

Wouldn't it be wonderful if she changed the role of government so that it STOPPED prosecuting marijuana violators?? I think it'd be great if the government supported equal rights for ALL of its citizens, and Nancy being from San Francisco, might just think that gay people ought to have the right to marry. I'd LOVE it if she remade government into one that gave amnesty to the illegal immigrants already here. Wouldn't it be cool if she stopped government from torturing people and stopped the government from spying on its own people? Wouldn't it be great if she supported a consumer advocate agency with Elizabeth Warren at it's helm? Maybe then the bankers would stop ripping us off!

Yeah, if she redefined the role of government to do THAT, I'd be mighty pleased.

excon

[tomder55]

I call it the slimes even on those rare occasions they get it right. Besides the fact that they are the lefty gospel ,the Ochs-Sulzberger's have historically been some of the sleaziest operators in journalism since the days of Adolph Ochs.

[NeedKarma]

I call it the slimes even on those rare occasions they get it right. Besides the fact that they are the lefty gospel ,the Ochs-Sulzberger's have historically been some of the sleaziest operators in journalism since the days of Adolph Ochs.

Better stick with your Fox News then LOL!

[tomder55]

Buried by the Times