[arcura]

Akoue,
I think you go that right.
He has been asked several time and dose not address the questions.
Fred

[Tj3]

Tj3,
Address my whole post, PLEASE!!!
This thread is about Peter.
Are you or are you not gointo answer the questions asked of you?

I have answered all relevant questions.

Jesus is on earth. The Bible says that He alone is head of the church. I do not need anything else.

Apparently you don't like the answer. I cannot help that.

[Alty]

It has been on this board dozens of time. The same people hijacking this thread hijacked many other threads for the same reason. I wonder why this small group fear a thread dedicated to the topic.

And I wonder why you won't answer the darn question. If it's already posted somewhere else then cut and paste, is that too hard for you?

Here we go round the mullberry bush. This is getting old Tom. :(

[Alty]

Then starting a new thread should not scare you so much.

As I can see that you're so eager (not) to give us the answer, why don't you start it?

[Akoue]

Then starting a new thread should not scare you so much.

So you'll post pages of evasions because you don't want to "hijack" the thread--even though it's not hijacking because the OP and the rest of us want you to explain your claim--but you won't answer the question. That's pretty flimsy rationalizing. You can either answer the question or admit that you can't answer it. It's pretty clear that you can't answer it, so why not just admit it?

[Tj3]

And I wonder why you won't answer the darn question. If it's already posted somewhere else then cut and paste, is that too hard for you?

Here we go round the mullberry bush. This is getting old Tom. :(

Well, I do not agree with hijacking of threads. This small groups seems to take pleasure in getting thread after thread shut down.

Then Akoue refuses to start a new thread because he says that it apparently is contrary to a policy by the mods and will be shut down. If it is not an issue on here, hijacking a thread, then it should be no issue in a new thread.

All the time wasted avoiding the issue by Akoue would be plenty of time to start a new thread. Something that he apparenly fears.

[Tj3]

As I can see that you're so eager (not) to give us the answer, why don't you start it?

Because it is a non-issue to me. Akoue seems to be the one who thinks that it is so important that he hijacks every thread that I post any message on.

[arcura]

Jj3.
Once aagain...
This thread is about Peter
Please address that AND answer the questions asked about your accusation concerning Constantine.
That is what the questions were about, not about Jesus.

[Alty]

Well, I do not agree with hijacking of threads. This small groups seems to take pleasure in getting thread after thread shut down.

Then Akoue refuses to start a new thread because he says that it apparently is contrary to a policy by the mods and will be shut down. If it is not an issue on here, hijacking a thread, then it should be no issue in a new thread.

All the time wasted avoiding the issue by Akoue would be plenty of time to start a new thread. Something that he apparenly fears.

Second verse same as the first, a little bit louder and a little bit worse!

Try again.

[Tj3]

So you'll post pages of evasions because you don't want to "hijack" the thread--even though it's not hijacking because the OP and the rest of us want you to explain your claim--but you won't answer the question. That's pretty flimsy rationalizing. You can either answer the question or admit that you can't answer it. It's pretty clear that you can't answer it, so why not just admit it?

Akoue, you know better. If you believed for a moment what claim, you'd be starting that thread. But you use the "mods will shut it down excuse" and instead hijack every other thread.

[Akoue]

Well, I do not agree with hijacking of threads. This small groups seems to take pleasure in getting thread after thread shut down.

Then Akoue refuses to start a new thread because he says that it apparently is contrary to a policy by the mods and will be shut down. If it is not an issue on here, hijacking a thread, then it should be no issue in a new thread.

All the time wasted avoiding the issue by Akoue would be plenty of time to start a new thread. Something that he apparenly fears.

That's right, Akoue is the mean guy who expects you to back up your claims. You insist that others support their claims with evidence. Now it is your turn to do the same. You're trying to pick fights in the hope that you can wait out the closing of the thread. But this has gone on long enough that it's obvious to anyone reading that you like making dismissive claims about the Catholic Church but, when push comes to shove, you haven't the wherewithal to back up those claims. So prove me wrong: Give us evidence for your assertion that the Catholic Church was begun by Constantine in the fourth century.

[Tj3]

Jj3.
Once aagain...
This thread is about Peter

Right and that is the point that I made.

Please address that AND answer the questions asked about your accusation concerning Constantine.

I made no accusation.

That is what the questions were about, not about Jesus.

So when you discuss who the head of the church is, we are to keep the name of Jesus out of it?

[arcura]

Tj3,
I do not want this thread to be shut down.
I was the one who started the threads about Peter because I wanted the answers and I still do.
So don't accuse me or others about shutting down this thread.

[Tj3]

That's right, Akoue is the mean guy who expects you to back up your claims.

But every time I do, you just come back and hijack another thread and do this all over again.

[JoeT777]

Because it is a non-issue to me. Akoue seems to be the one who thinks that it is so important that he hijacks each and every thread that I post any message on.

You know I’ve really got to question why a person would claim to have “the Light of the World” and then sticks said light under a basket. Let’s see how many lumens your light has, if any.

JoeT

[Tj3]

Tj3,
I do not want this thread to be shut down.

That is why I am trying to Akoue to move the other topic off here.

[Alty]

Oh Tom, this is embarrassing, you're the only one that's believing your crap. Why don't you just give up already, admit that you cannot substantiate your claims and then we can move on. Is it that hard for you to admit you're wrong?

Page after page of you dodging and ducking.

Please read what we've all written, comprehend it, then either answer the darn question asked of you or admit that you can't.

I swear, if I read the word hijack again I'm going to get my whip. ;)

[Tj3]

You know I've really got to question why a person would claim to have “the Light of the World” and then sticks said light under a basket. Let's see how many lumens your light has, if any.

JoeT

Ho hum - Fred just told me not to talk about Jesus, and you say that I am hiding the light under a basket.

[Akoue]

But every time I do, you just come back and hijack another thread and do this all over again.

But you haven't. As Altenweg has suggested, if you have answered it then it would be easy to cut and paste. I've been asking you to explain this assertion since November. You haven't done it. So here's your opportunity: You have an engraved invitation from us all. Now answer the question.

[JoeT777]

That's right, Akoue is the mean guy who expects you to back up your claims. You insist that others support their claims with evidence. Now it is your turn to do the same. You're trying to pick fights in the hope that you can wait out the closing of the thread. But this has gone on long enough that it's obvious to anyone reading that you like making dismissive claims about the Catholic Church but, when push comes to shove, you haven't the wherewithal to back up those claims. So prove me wrong: Give us evidence for your assertion that the Catholic Church was begun by Constantine in the fourth century.

Wait a minute! Being the bad guy is my Job!

JoeT