Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #21

    Jun 24, 2016, 05:04 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello clete:

    It's true.. But, nationalism comes in 3 flavors. Which one are you?

    a) A nationalist who LOVES his country, wants the best for it, and thinks everybody should want the best for their country too,

    b) A nationalist who LOVES his country, wants the best for it, but at another country's expense,

    c) A nationalist who LOVES his country and wants the best for it because he's a superior race..


    excon
    Surely you know me well enough Ex to know the answer is (a)

    I was in favour of brexit even though there is an economic cost, Britain is entitled to chart their own course, I don't think they ever signed up to be part of a United States of Europe but that is the path the EU was on
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #22

    Jun 24, 2016, 05:42 PM
    The truth of the matter Clete is that the older generations blame immigrants on their misfortunes instead of the austerity policies of conservative lawmakers as a reaction to the global meltdown, and that applies specifically to Britain AND the EU, and the US, for that matter and most other places for sure.

    Seems bigots will buy any excuse other than blame their elected leaders. You're right though the UK can plot there own course without the benefit of no tariffs on their exports.

    "The immigrants are coming! The immigrants are coming" is the call of the bigots. Good thing they have a moat already, so they don't have to build a wall.
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #23

    Jun 24, 2016, 09:38 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    The truth of the matter Clete is that the older generations blame immigrants on their misfortunes instead of the austerity policies of conservative lawmakers as a reaction to the global meltdown, and that applies specifically to Britain AND the EU, and the US, for that matter and most other places for sure.

    Seems bigots will buy any excuse other than blame their elected leaders. You're right though the UK can plot there own course without the benefit of no tariffs on their exports.

    "The immigrants are coming! The immigrants are coming" is the call of the bigots. Good thing they have a moat already, so they don't have to build a wall.
    I think the reality is,Tal, the immigrants had already come, Britain is awash with them with the prospect of more, success has its own rewards as I'm sure you know. The Britions did what everyone else was thinking, we want our country back! Have you noticed where the Britons want to spend the money they save, on Hospitals. Don't think that people here don't have the same thoughts
    . I have come to the conclusion one muslim is a muslim too many. It is time to build that wall if you don't already have one but we are building it in the wrong place, it should be built along the shores of the mediterranian
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #24

    Jun 25, 2016, 05:15 AM
    I think the reality is,Tal, the immigrants had already come,
    It's not a voluntary human migration at all, but a product of the Syrian WAR! Like most instances of human conflicts.

    Britain is awash with them with the prospect of more,
    No they aren't but of course you inflate the number GROSSLY to justify your worst fears and maybe that's understandable given your own countries approach to the problem of boat people, or the indigenous "lazy" (your word from previous posts) you took from them when you were the IMMIGRANT from another land.

    You are one to talk aren't you? Unless of course you are an INDIGENOUS Australian.

    success has its own rewards as I'm sure you know.
    LOL, of course I know that and to date no society on Earth has solved the fall outs of WAR, or the poverty, and suffering that that always follows.


    The Britions did what everyone else was thinking, we want our country back!
    BS, facts show that the "LEAVERS" narrowly won the referendum, and their was just slightly less voters for the REMAINERS, so again you conflate the FACTS.

    Have you noticed where the Britons want to spend the money they save, on Hospitals. Don't think that people here don't have the same thoughts
    Health care systems are in shambles in Briton because of the austerity cuts to funding and benefits, and fact is this is a global situation (Except for the wealthy... country doesn't matter! ). The savings from leaving the EU is at best dubious given the financial repercussions which have not even been realized yet... but they will!

    . I have come to the conclusion one muslim is a muslim too many. It is time to build that wall if you don't already have one but we are building it in the wrong place, it should be built along the shores of the mediterranian
    Stay tuned as more FACTS will be revealed later and I have little doubt your arguments and attitude will be shown to be in ERROR due to short sighted, and non objective assessment of the FACTS of the matter.

    Prejudicial and biased are the words I ascribe to your opinion. See I can be NICE! :D
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #25

    Jun 25, 2016, 02:12 PM
    Going to a next door country FROM a country actually at war would be considered reffugee, picking an affluent country halfway across the world to move to illegally turns them into economic opportunists. And takes away any moral high ground they might have actually had.

    Many of these people aren't even Syrian to begin with, which disqualifies them from using the term refugee.
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #26

    Jun 25, 2016, 02:28 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by smoothy View Post
    Going to a next door country FROM a country actually at war would be considered reffugee, picking an affluent country halfway across the world to move to illegally turns them into economic opportunists. And takes away any moral high ground they might have actually had.

    Many of these people aren't even Syrian to begin with, which disqualifies them from using the term refugee.
    Thank God the U.S. welcomed my poor German ancestors as immigrants during the European wars in the mid-1800s!
    tickle's Avatar
    tickle Posts: 23,796, Reputation: 2674
    Expert
     
    #27

    Jun 25, 2016, 04:04 PM
    This is now a conclusive question. It will take years before it can be resolved. Brits have left the EU so we wait and see about Scotland and they are wanting to stay in the EU.

    THIS is no longer a political issue.




    R
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #28

    Jun 25, 2016, 04:33 PM
    Britain has not left the EU, the British people have expressed an opinion and it is now up to politicians to decide if they are brave enough to implement it or not. What is surely needed is an election. It is a difficult position to be in. uncharted waters. The result is disputed by those who didn't vote, this is why we have compulsory voting, it ensures a true representative result. The Europeans want a rush to exit because they fear the instability of a drawn out process but Britons should fear the fall out in political instability.

    The scots are a tiny part of the equation, 6 million people and moves on their part will only contribute to instability
    Curlyben's Avatar
    Curlyben Posts: 18,514, Reputation: 1860
    BossMan
     
    #29

    Jun 26, 2016, 01:31 AM
    The whole leave campaign was run from a xenophobic stand point, immigration was the main angle.
    It is clear that the British people have little understanding of this hot topic.
    They fail to understand that being in or out of the EU has little effect on net migration.
    Part of the EU treaty was the freedom for members to move within member states for work etc.

    The "immigration problem" is actually non-EU citizen, especially Middle Eastern decent, mainly Syria.
    Therein lies the crux of the matter that people will only slowly start to realise...

    It is interesting to see the movements happening in other EU states on a similar bandwagon.
    The NF of Le Penn in France are calling for their own referendum..

    This could very well be the beginning of the end of the EU as we know it...
    Catsmine's Avatar
    Catsmine Posts: 3,826, Reputation: 739
    Pest Control Expert
     
    #30

    Jun 26, 2016, 02:32 AM
    I read a quip that sums up my feelings on Brexit pretty well: someone said "I hope Britain can survive without Greece."
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #31

    Jun 26, 2016, 03:43 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Curlyben View Post

    The "immigration problem" is actually non-EU citizen, especially Middle Eastern decent, mainly Syria.
    Therein lies the crux of the matter that people will only slowly start to realise...



    This could very well be the beginning of the end of the EU as we know it...
    I refute that is is about Syrian refugees, they are a small part of the equation, Britain has many residents who are not of british descent, people from the subcontintent, about 4 million, people from eastern europe, more than a million, people of african descent. The point is there are more than 10 % non britons in Britain and as some Britons have said they are swamping services like hospitals and doctors, taking jobs and changing the nature of Britain. The people of the UK are entitled to their own country and entitled to say enough. You may think this is xenophopic but it is not. I know how they feel. If you go to a hospital outpatients in my country in western Sydney you will see the services swamped by "middle eastern" people. These are not the people the services were created to serve, meaning the services must be vastly expanded. No one in this state made the decision to accept these people. We are yet to see the impact of Syrian refugees and it is the same for the people of the UK. I hear British people want to migrate here, they are very acceptable, no one has to educate them in our values, our language, our laws, our politicial or religious beliefs
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #32

    Jun 26, 2016, 05:19 AM
    You may think this is xenophopic
    How about outlandishly bigoted?
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #33

    Jun 26, 2016, 06:41 AM
    I,will say the true bigotry and xenphobia is the anti anyone not Muslim or middle eastern in the middle east that's the root of most of the middle east side problems.

    It's also not bigoted or xenophobic for the people of any nation to determine who they will allow into THEIR, and this is THEIR country.

    Every country has a right to control it's borders and determine who will and will not be allowed in.

    And it's not bigoted to be wary or unwilling to want the one ethic / religious groups historically responsible for over 99% of terrorism on the grounds of keeping the population safe. Because it's based on sound, proven and reasonable facts.

    Would you refuse to allow a member of a MS 13 in your house to babysit your children?

    Probably not, and for the very same reasons?

    As far as how this applies to the UK, why should Belgium and Germany decide how many illegals they MOST accept and pay for. Maybe the UK should give up its own currency as well, and let monetary policy be determined by someone else as well, why go halfway.

    I know many Italians want out,28 years of knowing true Italians I understand their issues with being pushed around yet again by the Germans, etc over stuff the Germans etc aren't willing to pay for.

    Being bullied into buying and paying for stuff they don't want, and can't afford to pay for..

    The UK isn't really fully integrated in the EU now, otherwise the would have the EURO, and wouldn't be booking at the trash that's been trying to cross from France everyone else is being forced to take.

    After all, what a few million more people on the dole committing crimes, they have more rights than the Britons have.

    Personally I have no gripes with the UK, even though I have no English blood in my family tree, I do have Irish and Scottish as well as German. Odd I am supporting the Bits who want self determination, against the Current German bullying in the EU.
    Curlyben's Avatar
    Curlyben Posts: 18,514, Reputation: 1860
    BossMan
     
    #34

    Jun 26, 2016, 08:49 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by paraclete View Post
    I refute that is is about Syrian refugees, they are a small part of the equation,
    I'm surprised at you clete, why focus on one small element of what I said, especially as that's only a minor part of the overall issue.
    I think you've missed my point completely, but never mind..

    Refugees are one thing, but this is about the entire issue.
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #35

    Jun 26, 2016, 04:00 PM
    Curly you said the issue is non EU citizen and yes to an extent it is, very much so, but it is also the more than a million EU citizens resident in the UK. The UK has woken up to a nightmare, for years they have tried to moderate the flow of immigrants with constant issues at their border with France but EU rules impose a burden on them and with an influx of refugees into Germany, where are those refugees going to go once they have the recognition, some will head for the UK because not all those refugees are syrian. There is a point in the life of a country when you need to focus on your own problems. We, none of us, are here to solve the problems of the middle east or Africa or eastern europe or asia and the UK has said very clearly "enough"

    Yes there is more than migration in this, there is regulation and non representative government
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #36

    Jun 29, 2016, 05:32 PM
    I think on both sides of the Atlantic the revolt is against the bureaucratic state. Legislators have been replaced by executive administrators and the people have lost their representation. This is a good revolt . However ,In this country the sorry excuse for rebellion says that we should hire a competent executive to manage the elephantine nanny state . Pathetic !

    I don't think the powers in Brussels or London will allow the will of the people to be executed .
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #37

    Jun 30, 2016, 05:02 AM
    Tom I don't think they will usurp the democratic process. England is where the greatest support for brexit is, therefore a lot of politicians loose their seats if they ignore the result. This represents a massive vote of no confidence in the conservatives, in government generally, therefore Cameron shouldn't wait, he should call an election or at very least throw the leadership up for a vote. I understand they are afraid of UKIP but the longer they wait the worse the result will be. They have had a referundum, if Cameron won't implement it, he should resign, not wait for the party convention. He made a brave decision, now he has to make another
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #38

    Jun 30, 2016, 09:46 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by paraclete View Post
    Tom I don't think they will usurp the democratic process.

    The EU usurps the democratic process. Brexit is Magna Carta 2.0 ....... freedom from unelected and unaccountable socialist bureaucrats, and a court that is increasingly making legal decisions that replace British law .
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #39

    Jun 30, 2016, 09:59 AM
    Stupid British government went along with the stupid EU governing body. Much like governments across the globe and especially here in the US where our own government serves the rich elites interest, and ignores the common citizen.
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #40

    Jun 30, 2016, 04:24 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    Stupid British government went along with the stupid EU governing body. Much like governments across the globe and especially here in the US where our own government serves the rich elites interest, and ignores the common citizen.
    Yes even at least one of your presidents has endorsed the New World Order and Obama is working to bring it about

    . When Britain joined the EU I expect that what they expected was something akin to a free trade agreement, it is doubtful they expected to be come just another state ruled by a federal government in Brussles. They have resisted handing over soveriegnty and this one more rebutal. I'm amazed the scots want to bow down to european domination nad are trying to drag Britain with them

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Any others? Your opinion? [ 8 Answers ]

For a woman who for the last few years of her life described herself as bi-sexual just because of something that happened in her teens and having a "Girl crush" on one of her best friends that led people to make her think she was bi I'm extremely confused now. Let me describe my life, I can...

Express weight as afunction of time [ 1 Answers ]

A rocket burns up at the rate of 2.5 tons/minute after falling out of orbit into the atmosphere. If the rocket weighed 6000 tons before reentry, express its weight w as a function of the time t, in minutes of reentry. I believe the answer is w=2.5t 6000/2.5 2.5t/2.5 t=2400 Help please

2 Email Accounts in Outlook Express at Same Time [ 7 Answers ]

Is this possible? My wife uses Roadrunner and Gmail, but really likes Outlook Express. Is it possible to have both email accounts operating at the same time in O.E.? If so, can you tell me how to set it up? I had Roadrunner Tech Support walk me through the OE set up the 1st time, but...

Setting up Outlook Express first time ! [ 1 Answers ]

Hello all, I want to set up my Yahoo email in outlook express but, I don't know what parameters should be given in (1) Incoming mail (POP3, IMAP or HTTP): and (2) Outgoing Mail (SMTP) : Can anyone advice what addresses should I have to type in both the above mention fields ? Thanks !


View more questions Search