Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #81

    Apr 17, 2014, 07:12 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    No different than Hannity or Limbaugh.
    Really?. exactly what things are they funding with their billions of dollars exactly?
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #82

    Apr 17, 2014, 07:13 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    That's correct. But, if past performance is any indication, we'll be waiting a long time.
    WHy shoud I prove anything... you haven't proved your claims at all via a source that's not so obviously biased.
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #83

    Apr 17, 2014, 07:47 PM
    this debate is going in circles, restating the same "facts" doesn't make them true or pertinent. Bundy has the course of legal action open to him, but the government has the ability to change the rules. A lease is a right to use, it does not confer permanent use and usually you cannot be compensated for leasehold improvements. If you break the terms of a lease by failing to pay the lease fee, this terminates the lease. Surely 20 years of stuffing about is enough latitude
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #84

    Apr 17, 2014, 07:55 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by paraclete View Post
    this debate is going in circles, restating the same "facts" doesn't make them true or pertinent. Bundy has the course of legal action open to him, but the government has the ability to change the rules. A lease is a right to use, it does not confer permanent use and usually you cannot be compensated for leasehold improvements. If you break the terms of a lease by failing to pay the lease fee, this terminates the lease. Surely 20 years of stuffing about is enough latitude
    WHen you've been doing it openly for well over 20+ years... and nobody says or does anything... that becomes a prescriptive rights issue. And he stands a really good chance of winning on that basis.

    http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/04...defense-court/
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #85

    Apr 18, 2014, 12:02 AM
    Good Luck with that, a quick piece of retrospective legislation will extinguish his "rights", he is afterall one person,
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #86

    Apr 18, 2014, 01:45 AM
    Most other litigants would have filed a lien on the property, which would get satisfied when the property is sold or inherited.. Instead the government sent in the jackboots. The fact is that the Bundy family purchased grazing and surface water rights to the land in perpetuity in the 1880s, long before BLM existed. It was Bundy and the other ranchers who installed wells and irrigation , fencing, cattle guards,,built access roads etc. ,and maintained and worked the land.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #87

    Apr 18, 2014, 01:50 AM
    Prescriptive easements are common in this country . My driveway goes through my neighbor's property .I can't claim the property as my own ,but he can't prevent me from driving on it .
    Tuttyd's Avatar
    Tuttyd Posts: 53, Reputation: 4
    Junior Member
     
    #88

    Apr 18, 2014, 04:00 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by smoothy View Post
    WHy shoud I prove anything... you haven't proved your claims at all via a source that's not so obviously biased.

    You should because the quote provided is one of the worst examples of quote mining seen here for a long time.

    The source is irrelevant in this case because it contains the quote in context-- as opposed to the mined quote.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #89

    Apr 18, 2014, 04:27 AM
    I think not . The fact that domestic agencies have purchased unprecedented amts of assault weapons and ammo....and the fact that we've documented a number of recent cases where these weapons have been deployed against civilians ,leads one to believe that the intent of that quote has more to do with our interpretation.
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #90

    Apr 18, 2014, 04:29 AM
    You've proven neither. I doubt your interpretation is better that the original speaker's actual words. Ideology will make you see something that isn't there to further your own beliefs.
    Tuttyd's Avatar
    Tuttyd Posts: 53, Reputation: 4
    Junior Member
     
    #91

    Apr 18, 2014, 04:34 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    You've proven neither. I doubt your interpretation is better that the original speaker's actual words. Ideology will make you see something that isn't there to further your own beliefs.
    That's correct.


    Tom's response has nothing to do with quote mining. It changes nothing in relation to the two quotes provided. In fact, "our interpretation" is a pretty good definition of quote mining.
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #92

    Apr 18, 2014, 04:56 AM
    Harry Reids slide into senility continues at a rapid place.

    Harry Reid Calls Cliven Bundy Supporters “Domestic Terrorists” |

    He'll be drooling and wearing diapers soon if he's not already.
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #93

    Apr 18, 2014, 05:02 AM
    And more proof the Federal Government and the Dept of injustice and the BLM or out of control...

    http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/04...aries-hit-men/

    Paid hitmen (murderers for hire) who aren't even law enforcement people.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #94

    Apr 18, 2014, 05:04 AM
    what is out of content is the 2 sentences in relation to the rest of the emperor's address about volunteerism . Take off your blinders. What do those sentences mean in relation to expanding community service opportunities for Americans ? Nothing ...it was an off teleprompter moment when his true thoughts were revealed.
    (here is the prepared text of the speech . Those lines were added in a candid moment revealing his real intent . Text of Obama's speech : DNC 2008 : The Rocky Mountain News )
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #95

    Apr 18, 2014, 05:12 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Tuttyd View Post
    You should because the quote provided is one of the worst examples of quote mining seen here for a long time.

    The source is irrelevant in this case because it contains the quote in context-- as opposed to the mined quote.
    Typical liberal... they rant away... but refuse to offer any real proof on their own ( and when they do its from a ultra left wing source, usually funded by Soros)... but expect everyone else to do it.
    Tuttyd's Avatar
    Tuttyd Posts: 53, Reputation: 4
    Junior Member
     
    #96

    Apr 18, 2014, 05:34 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by smoothy View Post
    Typical liberal... they rant away... but refuse to offer any real proof on their own ( and when they do its from a ultra left wing source, usually funded by Soros)... but expect everyone else to do it.
    What part of the ad hominiem fallacy are you having problems with understanding smoothy? The source is irrelevant to the truth or falsity of a claim. The test comes by way of analysis of what is being said.
    Tuttyd's Avatar
    Tuttyd Posts: 53, Reputation: 4
    Junior Member
     
    #97

    Apr 18, 2014, 05:51 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    what is out of content is the 2 sentences in relation to the rest of the emperor's address about volunteerism . Take off your blinders. What do those sentences mean in relation to expanding community service opportunities for Americans ? Nothing ...it was an off teleprompter moment when his true thoughts were revealed.
    (here is the prepared text of the speech . Those lines were added in a candid moment revealing his real intent . Text of Obama's speech : DNC 2008 : The Rocky Mountain News )
    Of course it's out of context.It's not for you or "our interpretation" to decide. You cannot sum up a speech of this size with 2 lines. It's the height of ridiculousness.

    The relevant 5 or 6 paragraphs are there for everyone to see. Post this, and then provide your interpretations. That's the standard procedure when it comes to academia and quality journalism.

    Now that I have read the relevant sections I have an interpretation. I don't need you to tell me how I should be interpreting a speech.
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #98

    Apr 18, 2014, 06:16 AM
    Obama Sends Hundreds of Armed Feds to Nevada Wouldnt Send 1 Soldier to Defend Benghazi Why?

    http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/04/17/obama-sends-hundreds-armed-feds-nevada-wouldnt-send-1-soldier-defend-benghazi/


    This speaks volumes about the post smoking cocain snorting tyrant ocupying the white house...
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #99

    Apr 18, 2014, 06:20 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Tuttyd View Post
    What part of the ad hominiem fallacy are you having problems with understanding smoothy? The source is irrelevant to the truth or falsity of a claim. The test comes by way of analysis of what is being said.
    Reall6y... THe source has EVERYTHING to do about the validity of a claim... case in point... the so-called VIDEO... nobody ever saw... being blamed for Benghazi...

    Source was the white house... claim was completely false and fabricated, and proven to be so... yet was still backed up and supported by other left wing hacks who have no regard for facts... they just want to push a falicy on the public..,. something that's been a daily occurrence the last 6 years under Obama on essentially everything, and everyone he has appointed to any position.

    ANYTHING connected to scum like Soros and his money is suspect....and in fact needs to be assumed as false unless it can be proven true based on the extensive history of lies and misinformation he and his kind are responsible for.
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #100

    Apr 18, 2014, 06:23 AM
    This speaks volumes
    Actually that website you seem to love speaks volumes about your lack of need for facts to believe a story, as long as it fits your agenda. The author is "active white supremacist and secessionist sympathizer" which does indeed fit your agenda.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Ranch movie [ 3 Answers ]

Help me please! I have been thinking about this movie for years! It's set on a ranch/farm, the owner is a sick young man, a con man and his girl come along, the girl marries the owner and the con-man works the ranch/farm. The girl actually falls in love with the owner and I don't remember the...

Building UP on a ranch [ 3 Answers ]

Hi. We are looking at a ranch that was built in 1948. It has no basement. The current structure is 2400 square feet, hardwood floors and seems pretty solid. How do we get a ballpark on how much it would cost to build up. THere is some room to build out, but I am not sure we could get what we...

Ranch additions [ 2 Answers ]

My home is a 1000 square foot ranch with a breezeway and attached approx. 24x24 ft 2 car garage. What I'm wondering is what the cost would be to put on an unfinished second story across the whole house. I know that the foundation for my garage is good for a 2 story structure. Also the cost of an...

Cathedral ceilings in a ranch [ 3 Answers ]

I just bought my grandmothers 1960 ranch. I would like to install a cathedral ceiling in the living room area, is this possible for a Do it yourselfer? It has bolted 2x6 W truss roof I am looking to do approx 15 foot wide section. Would a wall out of 2x4's for the sheet rock at the center beam be...

Adding A Second Floor To A Large Ranch [ 12 Answers ]

Hello, I hope your day is going well and thank you in advance for helping me. My brother passed away and my mother really needs me around so we came up with an idea of adding a second floor to the family home. It's an oversized ranch. It's fairly large to begin with but I can't exactly start...


View more questions Search