 |
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Nov 1, 2013, 08:17 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
That's pretty much the same argument I use when examples of leakage are cited as an example of the negatives of fracking .
Totally agree, things can be done better and safer.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Nov 1, 2013, 08:19 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
Totally agree, things can be done better and safer.
The difference then is that I would not close down a whole industry because of isolated violations.
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Nov 1, 2013, 08:27 AM
|
|
I would for system wide or repeated violations. We agree again as isolated can be dealt with case by case.
|
|
 |
Junior Member
|
|
Nov 1, 2013, 03:13 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
That's pretty much the same argument I use when examples of leakage are cited as an example of the negatives of fracking .
Me to. So why don't you apply the same standards to solar energy when it is done badly?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Nov 1, 2013, 03:21 PM
|
|
I do have the same standards . I think the market should decide which energy sources make it .
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Nov 1, 2013, 03:39 PM
|
|
The market place is skewed toward short term profits, not enough long term investment. If it was we would have massive infrastructure activity in many areas.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Nov 1, 2013, 09:18 PM
|
|
Nah markets aren't interested in infrastructure, look at how road, bridges, railroads are run down
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Nov 2, 2013, 02:52 AM
|
|
Infrastructure maintenance and development would be much better off if we adopted a public-private partnership approach. You should know that .Australia has had success with that formula.
http://www.irfnet.ch/files-upload/kn...0PPPs_2007.pdf
This study examined 54 projects in Aussie ;and found that the privately financed ones had smaller cost overruns and were more likely to be finished on schedule than those financed through traditional methods.
I'm not saying that's the answer to all infrastructure challenges. But where it has been adopted ,it has had success.
But Tal's comment is a dodge . The fact is that of course governments can command and control an economy .Many do.....up to the moment the economy fails .
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Nov 2, 2013, 03:12 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
The market place is skewed toward short term profits, not enough long term investment. If it was we would have massive infrastructure activity in many areas.
Profits are a good indicator of the market ;and the market today does not want your stinkin "green economy"
Volt sales drop 32% in October | The Detroit News
When that changes ,I assure you the VOLT or a different plug in will rule the market . But y'all nuts if you think that windmills can provide the power our economy needs.
|
|
 |
Junior Member
|
|
Nov 2, 2013, 03:52 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
Profits are a good indicator of the market ;and the market today does not want your stinkin "green economy"
Volt sales drop 32% in October | The Detroit News
When that changes ,I assure you the VOLT or a different plug in will rule the market . But y'all nuts if you think that windmills can provide the power our economy needs.
I think the idea ( at least from our perspective anyway) is that a variety of renewable energy sources have gained momentum within recent times. There appears to be is commitment by the public and private for future expansion.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Nov 2, 2013, 04:07 AM
|
|
I'm all in favor of the private development of emerging technology ;and I'm in favor of government being involved in R & D . What I oppose is subsidization of one industry in competition with another to achieve some predetermined market shift . Bottom line ;and so far it has proven to be true ,is that it is a needless waste of tax dollars that achieves little results. If solar power has a future ,it won't be because the government deems it so.
The Abound Solar plant is just one of many such examples of this in the last 5 years.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Nov 2, 2013, 04:43 AM
|
|
Hello again, tom:
Profits are a good indicator of the market ;and the market today does not want your stinkin "green economy"
Oh, really??? Profits ARE a good indicator... Tesla is killing it.
excon
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Nov 2, 2013, 04:48 AM
|
|
Germany over reacted to Fukushima Daiichi and began taking down their nuclear industry .They thought windmills and solar was the answer .Without coal ,they are left vulnerable to natural gas pipelines controlled by Tsar Vladdy .
|
|
 |
Junior Member
|
|
Nov 3, 2013, 03:21 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Political forums probably contribute to depression as well.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Nov 3, 2013, 10:35 PM
|
|
OK tutt we will shut down askmehelpdesk and the economy will recover
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Nov 6, 2013, 08:20 PM
|
|
I'll wipe my butt as many times as I deem necessary to assure an absence of skid marks in my shorts.
The tree huggers can get stuffed.
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Eco cycle?
[ 1 Answers ]
My Kenmore front loading washer has an Eco Cycle and I don't know what that means
What is an eco error on a hot water heater?
[ 2 Answers ]
I have a Rheem hot water heater. Model PVP50F, it has the hooded vent/motor and electric starter/pilot lighter. The starter is displaying an Eco Error message. 4 flashes a second pause and 2 flashes.
Is there a way to reset or is there a way to manually light the Pilot?
Criminal law
[ 2 Answers ]
How can I view my own police record for free?
View more questions
Search
|