 |
|
|
 |
Internet Research Expert
|
|
Aug 25, 2013, 06:50 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
Likely the unions will negotiate good terms for it members. That's what they do. Blue collar guys may have different needs than others, especially the seasonal ones.
Likely they will not is more like the truth. If they had negotiated properly then we wouldn't be having the mess we are in. I have seen plenty of businesses shut down by the unions. Why? Because they think they have a blank check when it comes to contracts. Reality says different.
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Aug 25, 2013, 07:22 AM
|
|
Economic reality is that market and management affect the health of business more than unions do, and there is profit to be made buying and selling a business that has nothing to do with labor agreements.
But, if you are of the mindset that workers who help turn your idea into profit have no stake in the success or failure of what ever business you have then of course its very easy to blame the workers for failure. The fact is that most workers, union or not are the first to make adjustments to business during leaner times.
I use the loss of manufacturing jobs as a case where after MANY years of wage stagnation and contract concessions, still lost jobs to cheaper labor elsewhere across the globe. In almost every case, workers lost a livelihood and everything else they worked hard for, while business thrived even more.
So to blame unions for business decisions is basically prejudicial, and misguided. The boss lost his business, but he seldom loses a dime. I respectfully submit that investors and upper management make out like the bandits they are while passing the loses onto workers, and former workers who believed the promises of security that was wiped out by business shenanigan they have no power over.
All business seems to care about is the cheapest labor they can get, because free labor is illegal.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 26, 2013, 04:16 AM
|
|
Yes it is obvious some people can't sleep at night
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 31, 2013, 11:50 AM
|
|
Remember when there was a penalty for the individual mandate for not signing onto a plan ? Then SCOTUS twisted the wording of the law and called it a "tax " to justify it's constitutionality ? Well the Obots have renamed it once again.
The final rule on Obamacare's individual mandate, released this week by the IRS , uses the term “Shared Responsibility Payment for Not Maintaining Minimum Essential Coverage” more than 50 times to describe the mandate's penalty, ooops I mean tax. \
http://www.irs.gov/PUP/newsroom/REG-148500-12%20FR.pdf
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 31, 2013, 03:39 PM
|
|
How you must hate that concept of shared responsibility, otherwise known as socialism
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 31, 2013, 03:58 PM
|
|
A tax is a tax... a penalty is a penalty . To call it "shared responsibility" is dishonest Orwellian Obama-speak. Don't look now ;but the emperor is about to embark on another "kinetic military action ". But I digress . It should be noted that the emperor and Congress have deemed it fine that they and their staff are exempt from this "shared responsibility" I guess some pigs are more equal than others.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Aug 31, 2013, 05:16 PM
|
|
Hello again,
Tax, schmax... People will LIVE now who would have died...
Excon
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Aug 31, 2013, 06:25 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
a tax is a tax ....a penalty is a penalty . to call it "shared responsibility" is dishonest Orwellian Obama-speak. Don't look now ;but the emperor is about to embark on another "kinetic military action ". But I digress . It should be noted that the emperor and Congress have deemed it fine that they and their staff are exempt from this "shared responsibility" I guess some pigs are more equal than others.
But this term was used by the same organisation that brought you the investigation of right wing charitable organisations, I know you think they are biased but there is nothing tax collectors like more than a good tax they can get their teeth into, after all, all tax is to fund a shared responsibility
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2013, 03:04 AM
|
|
Nah ,taxes properly employed and administered fund the necessary duties of the government . You lefties use it as a redistribution tool and call it shared responsibility to disguise the theft .
|
|
 |
Junior Member
|
|
Sep 1, 2013, 03:44 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by tomder55
nah ,taxes properly employed and administered fund the necessary duties of the government . You lefties use it as a redistribution tool and call it shared responsibility to disguise the theft .
A leftie?
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Sep 1, 2013, 04:47 AM
|
|
Hospital and taxpayers who bear the cost of emergency room visits is redistribution too isn't it? Why are you for that?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 3, 2013, 07:13 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
Hospital and taxpayers who bear the cost of emergency room visits is redistribution too isn't it? Why are you for that?
I thought that was what you lefties expected from those who have and corporations making gazillions, paying our fair share to help the needy.
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Sep 3, 2013, 03:26 PM
|
|
I wouldn't have a beeyatch if it were just you and your corporations, but taxpayers? You and your corporations don't pay your fair share in taxes or wages.
|
|
 |
Internet Research Expert
|
|
Sep 3, 2013, 03:30 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
I wouldn't have a beeyatch if it were just you and your corporations, but taxpayers?? You and your corporations don't pay your fair share in taxes or wages.
What is a fair share ?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 3, 2013, 04:31 PM
|
|
Oh I don't know can we settle for 110%
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 4, 2013, 05:07 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by talaniman
I wouldn't have a beeyatch if it were just you and your corporations, but taxpayers?? You and your corporations don't pay your fair share in taxes or wages.
Who is this "you" you speak of? I pay my taxes.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Sep 4, 2013, 05:29 AM
|
|
Yeah I used to do that but it's a bad scene so Now I don't need to, very liberating, I figure I don't need any air craft carriers this year
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 4, 2013, 05:59 AM
|
|
How about just admitting.. if you can afford to have an Iphone... you can afford to pay for your own medical insurance.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Sep 4, 2013, 05:59 AM
|
|
Hello again,
Yeah, yeah, yeah... Obamacare is flawed. But, the right wing has NO plan. They want a repeal to WHAT, I've asked before. I'm told back to what we had.
Or, maybe I wasn't, because the response was muddled. I'm asking for a CLEAR and CONCISE plan, if you have one...
But, you DON'T, and we ain't NEVER going back to a time when people died because they didn't have health insurance...
So, until YOU have a plan, your criticism falls on deaf ears.. It's the LAW. It's going to REMAIN the LAW. You need to get OVER it.
excon
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Obamacare 2.0
[ 440 Answers ]
Health Insurance Brokers Prepare Clients For Obamacare Sticker Shock - Forbes
Yeah it's the greedy provider's fault that they have to double rates to cover all the mandates in the plan.
Yeah the Obots were slick making sure all the low hanging fruit ;all the carrots like allowing your kids...
Obamacare For The Poor
[ 18 Answers ]
What happens in 2014. Women 60 years old is unemployed and has a preexisting condition. Has been denied medicaid in Florida, she did not met the current guild-lines. Only income is from her husband's social security check.
I wonder what will happen in this type of situation??
Obamacare...
[ 6 Answers ]
What exactly does it mean? I've heard different things from different people and don't know what to believe...
Obamacare's unconstitutional
[ 17 Answers ]
That's what U.S. District Judge Henry E. Hudson said today. He said the mandate requiring people to have medical insurance exceeds all constitutional "logical limitations ".
Judge in Va. strikes down federal health care law - Yahoo! News
If one part of Obamacare goes down then the whole law...
Alternatives to Obamacare;
[ 178 Answers ]
Obamacare, whatever that may be, is unpopular, not cost effective , and offensive to the people it is to care for and from whom paid taxes into this.
It is time to move on and look at alternatives to Obamacare and the CURRENT healthcare system we have in place. The ultimate goal being to provide...
View more questions
Search
|