[Tc123]

'Or something' to the light and airy casual flavor that is now a cryptic tale that can only be told to a professional.

Not really my dear. Not at all.

Either way, thanks again. My initial question was just as you see it. (Can someone get arrested... etc.) I know it is lengthy but I stated that I was not going to try and have him arrested. Not at all. And yes, of course there was good reason to be in contact with him.

Basically, my question was indeed answered already. I went into more detail after my initial post because I needed to for a couple of people.

No sarcasm here whatsoever. That is very ugly and that is not me. Dollin' is just short for Darling. I don't mean to insult your intelligence. I really do not. Things can get lost in translation through these means for sure. Again, I am not sarcastic, do not play games, do not put others down directly or subtly,

Thanks very much again and take good care!

[JudyKayTee]

"Not really my dear. Not at all. ... No sarcasm here whatsoever. That is very ugly and that is not me. Dollin' is just short for Darling. I don't mean to insult your intelligence. I really do not. Things can get lost in translation through these means for sure. Again, I am not sarcastic, do not play games, do not put others down directly or subtly, Thanks very much again and take good care!"

Joy is a very well respected member of this forum with many posts under her belt.

You are not sarcastic, putting others down directly or subtly and you don't play games - and you address Joy as "my dear"? I just saw that you addressed someone else as "Little Darling." Some sort of superiority complex? You don't realize you are being dismissive?

Your style, which I find flippant, is somewhat familiar to me - have you posted before under another name?

This isn't a blog site - or a dating site, for that matter.

I suppose it could have been worse - you could have addressed me as "my dear" - in the legal forum to boot!

So, Joy, my dear, carry on!

[joypulv]

'My initial question was just as you see it.'
Not.
A legal question about groping has to be in context, with details.
I see it as a dangerous question when you say you don't plan to have him arrested, but are curious to know if you can. Suggesting that you might either change your mind or use it as a threat. There is something coy about it all, including not wanting to discuss it further, and finally, being surprised that people are still responding, as though it's nothing. With mysterious suggestions that it's something.

[ScottGem]

The OP has indicated they they did have another name, but for some reason they can't get back into it.

[JudyKayTee]

Scott, where? I just read the last couple and didn't see that.

[Wondergirl]

Scott, where? I just read the last couple and didn't see that.

Post #10 -- "I have/had a different sign on name from an old computer whereas I was a previous member. Once I figure that out, maybe you guys may get to know me better. I know it's not too important in this case but maybe it would give you a better idea of things."

[JudyKayTee]

Oh, I'm supposed to read the posts before I answer?

Whoops!

Sorry!