[NeedKarma]

I see what you're trying to do, but it's not working.
You can't solve a problem if you refuse to admit there is one.

[speechlesstx]

No I'm quite certain you're just clueless.

[NeedKarma]

Your personal attacks just bounce off me. :D
It means you have nothing else to offer.

[speechlesstx]

Do you really not have anything more to offer than ankle-biting? It really floors me that this website doesn't give a rat's a$$ about your behavior. Go ahead mods, flag me again for standing up to his bullsh*t.

[NeedKarma]

You mean like you posting "You first"?

You stand up to me big man!

[speechlesstx]

You have no class, dude, and neither does a website that tolerates your constant goading and personal attacks. But thanks again for validating my point.

[Tuttyd]

Does being overseas matter? These are radical feminists and if you'd read the article their attack on this priest was to "stop homophobia," so I think that qualifies as a crusade against hate as defined by the left.

Well it actually does in this case. Given the fact that you have said that the aim of the this thread is to show how the left is by mounting a crusade against hate while at the same time exercising their hatred.

In order to be consistent with your assessment of the thread you would need to demonstrate that the overseas example has in place a similar, "crusade against hate" and they are in fact hypocritical in this respect.

So its not actually a crusade against hate in the overseas example you give. It is actually (as you point out ) a crusade against homophobia. You are conflating the positions to demonstrate a point.

[speechlesstx]

Personally the only difference I see in Femen and US anti-hate crusaders is they do it topless. I'll stand on my previous comments.

[Tuttyd]

Personally the only difference I see in Femen and US anti-hate crusaders is they do it topless. I'll stand on my previous comments.

Of course you don't see the difference and of course you stand by your previous comments. Of course you'll never see it any other way.

The reason for this has already been pointed out.

[speechlesstx]

I see no reason to back down when I believe I'm right and you're simply nitpicking.

[Tuttyd]

I see no reason to back down when I believe I'm right and you're simply nitpicking.

If it is nitpicking then you could try a rebuttal of the main points of my argument.

[speechlesstx]

Tut, half the time I don't even understand your point, I'm a simple guy. If your point is the difference between a "crusade against hate" and a "crusade against homophobia" it depends on one's view of homophobia. In this country homophobia is another synonym for "hate", and given the behavior of Femen toward this priest I think I can safely assume that's how they perceive it as well. I stand on my previous comments.

[Tuttyd]

Tut, half the time I don't even understand your point, I'm a simple guy. If your point is the difference between a "crusade against hate" and a "crusade against homophobia" it depends on one's view of homophobia. In this country homophobia is another synonym for "hate", and given the behavior of Femen toward this priest I think I can safely assume that's how they perceive it as well. I stand on my previous comments.

OK, then sorry about the nitpicking

[speechlesstx]

RGIII must be one of those uppity fellows ex mentioned. He offered this Tweet yesterday:

In a land of freedom we are held hostage by the tyranny of political correctness

Apparently that didn't go over too well with some. Doesn't he know he can't get out of step with real blacks?

[NeedKarma]

Who?

[talaniman]

What's your point?

[speechlesstx]

What's your point?

Just keeping up with current events.

[speechlesstx]

who?

Robert Griffin III

[NeedKarma]

Never heard of him. Why does his opinion matter again?

[speechlesstx]

Never heard of him. Why does his opinion matter again?

As if yours does?