|  
               
                |  |  | 
                    
                    
                    
                 |  
 
	
	
		
	
	
  | 
    
      
                |  | Full Member |  | 
 
                  
                      Jan 17, 2011, 05:55 AM
                  
                 |  |  
  
    | 
        
        
        
       
        
        Prove the Vertical asymptotic
       
                  
        I have an Function (in the picture) and I need to Prove  if X=0 can be a Vertical asymptotic so I tried to use in L'Hôpital's rule but is not Possible Because I not get 0/0 or -+Infinity/+-Infinity.
 
 so how can I prove it?
 
 and more  little thing tell me if I correct that X=1 is can't be an Vertical asymptotic
 
 thanks  for help :)
 |  
    |  |  
	
		
	
	
  | 
    
      
              |  | Senior Member |  | 
 
                  
                      Jan 17, 2011, 07:12 AM
                  
                 |  |  
  
    | 
        
        
        
       
                  
        If you rewrite the cot function as cos/sin, you'll see that the denominator really DOES go to zero.  
     |  
    |  |  
	
		
	
	
  | 
    
      
                |  | Full Member |  | 
 
                  
                      Jan 17, 2011, 07:56 AM
                  
                 |  |  
  
    | 
        
        
        
       
        
        Comment on jcaron2's post
       
                  
        so there is not Vertical asymptotic  for x=0 what about x=1 I calculated it and I found that there is no Vertical asymptotic when x=1 is correct? thank you
 |  
    |  |  
	
		
	
	
  | 
    
      
              |  | Senior Member |  | 
 
                  
                      Jan 17, 2011, 08:46 AM
                  
                 |  |  
  
    | 
        
        
        
       
        
        Comment on jcaron2's post
       
                  
        Yes, correct in both cases.  Good job!  But there ARE asymptotes at x= +/- 2, +/- 4, +/- 6,.  
     |  
    |  |  
	
		
	
	
  | 
    
      
                |  | Full Member |  | 
 
                  
                      Jan 17, 2011, 10:31 AM
                  
                 |  |  
  
    | 
        
        
        
       
        
        Comment on jcaron2's post
       
                  
        hi. I still dosen't Success to calculated  for x=0 can you Please show me any way to prove that there is no  Vertical asymptotic for x=1 ?
 really thank you.
 |  
    |  |  
	
		
	
	
  | 
    
      
                |  | Full Member |  | 
 
                  
                      Jan 17, 2011, 10:41 AM
                  
                 |  |  
  
    | 
        
        
        
       
        
        Comment on jcaron2's post
       
                  
        oh sorry I mean if you can show me any way to prove that there is no Vertical asymptotic for x=o.
 thanks.
 |  
    |  |  
	
		
	
	
  | 
    
      
              |  | Expert |  | 
 
                  
                      Jan 17, 2011, 10:52 AM
                  
                 |  |  
  
    | 
        
        
        
       
                  
        pop000: Use l'Hospital's rule.  The derivative of the numerator for x=0 is 1, and the derivative of the denominator for x = 0 is -pi/2.  So the limit as x goes to 0 is -2/pi.
 |  
    |  |  
	
		
	
	
  | 
    
      
              |  | Uber Member |  | 
 
                  
                      Jan 17, 2011, 11:07 AM
                  
                 |  |  
  
    | 
        
        
        
       
                  
        
That image is small >.<
  = \frac{x \cot \(\frac{\pi x}{2}\)}{x^3 - 1}})  
A strange graph that is... (http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y+%3D+\frac{x+cot+(\frac{\pi+x}{2})}{x^3+-+1})
 
Applying L'Hopital's rule (if I do that right... )
  = \frac{x \cot \(\frac{\pi x}{2}\)}{x^3 - 1} \rightarrow \frac{-1}{3x \sin\(\frac{\pi x}{2}\)}})  
But that graph is another strange one :eek:
     |  
    |  |  
	
		
	
	
  | 
    
      
              |  | Expert |  | 
 
                  
                      Jan 17, 2011, 11:22 AM
                  
                 |  |  
  
    | 
        
        
        
       
                  
        
Here's how I applied l'hospital:
  } {\sin(\frac {\pi x } 2) (x^3 -1)} \ = \\<br />
<br />
\lim_{x \to 0} \ \frac {x (-sin(\frac {\pi x} 2) + \cos( \frac {\pi x} 2)} {\sin(\frac {\pi x} 2) (3x^2) + \frac {\pi} 2 \cos(\frac {\pi x} 2) (x^3-1)}  \ = \ \frac 1 {-\pi/2} \ =\  \frac {-2} {\pi}<br />
)  |  
    |  |  
	
		
	
	
  | 
    
      
              |  | Uber Member |  | 
 
                  
                      Jan 17, 2011, 11:28 AM
                  
                 |  |  
  
    | 
        
        
        
       
                  
        Ah, I kept the cot in the numerator and gave me -1/sin^2(pi x/2)
 
 It seems strange to me though of how a different result is obtained beginning with the same function but applying l'Hopital's rule a 'different' way...
 |  
    |  |  
	
		
	
	
  | 
    
      
              |  | Expert |  | 
 
                  
                      Jan 17, 2011, 12:07 PM
                  
                 |  |  
  
    | 
        
        
        
       
                  
        
Applying l'Hospital to the equation in its original form doesn't work too well:
  } {(x^3 -1)} \ = \\<br />
<br />
\lim_{x \to 0} \ \frac {x \frac {\pi} 2 \frac {-1} {sin ^2(\frac {\pi x} 2) }+ \cot( \frac {\pi x} 2)} {3x^2}  \ = \ \frac {-\infty + \infty}  0<br />
)  
You can apply l'Hospital again, but it gets really messy and I gave up on it.
     |  
    |  |  
	
		
	
	
  | 
    
      
              |  | Uber Member |  | 
 
                  
                      Jan 17, 2011, 12:09 PM
                  
                 |  |  
  
    | 
        
        
        
       
                  
        Oops, seems I didn't do it well :o
 
 Thanks!
 |  
    |  |  
	
		
	
	
  | 
    
      
                |  | Full Member |  | 
 
                  
                      Jan 17, 2011, 12:22 PM
                  
                 |  |  
  
    | 
        
        
        
       
        
        Comment on Unknown008's post
       
                  
        Yes I also saw this graph and I am not see there any Vertical asymptotic. :)
     |  
    |  |  
	
		
	
	
  | 
    
      
                |  | Full Member |  | 
 
                  
                      Jan 17, 2011, 12:40 PM
                  
                 |  |  
  
    | 
        
        
        
       
        
        Comment on ebaines's post
       
                  
        Nice,  thank.
     |  
    |  |  
 
 
 
  
    | Question Tools | Search this Question |  
    |  |  |  
 Add your answer here.
 
Check out some similar questions!
Vertical labrett
 [ 2 Answers ]
So I got my vertical labret done 2 weeks ago now and its not healing any better, it looks like its getting infected and there's crusty stuff around the bottom but you can't see it but I can sure feel it I'm up to cleaning it 4 or more times a day,  Is that normal
 
Vertical blinds
 [ 3 Answers ]
I have vertical blinds and two of them aren't in sync with the rest. How do I fix this?
 
Vertical jump
 [ 6 Answers ]
I am 5'0" and 88 lbs. (13 years old) yeah i'm short. I have a 21" vertical. Is that good?
 
Vertical jump
 [ 2 Answers ]
I would like to get information on how I can improve my jump verically in basketball
 View more  questions
Search
 
 |