Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    gentlebreezee11's Avatar
    gentlebreezee11 Posts: 2, Reputation: 1
    New Member
     
    #1

    Aug 1, 2009, 10:34 PM
    Retroactive Child Support
    I recently filed for and is now receiving child support. I'm seeking retroactive child support going back to 2003. We go back to court on 10/29/09 regarding retroactive child support. My child's father was paying her tuition to attend private school but never contributed for food or shelter etc. Since the was paying her tuition, will this disqualify me from receiving retroactive child support and will they ask me why I'm just now requesting back child support.

    Thank you for your time.

    gentlebreezee11
    nikosmom's Avatar
    nikosmom Posts: 1,611, Reputation: 488
    Ultra Member
     
    #2

    Aug 1, 2009, 11:22 PM

    Child support is usually granted from the date it was filed not necessarily the date of the child's birth (unless the custodial parent is receiving public assistance). You said you recently filed so more than likely you will not be granted any payments prior to filing... and especially not going back as far as 2003.
    ScottGem's Avatar
    ScottGem Posts: 64,966, Reputation: 6056
    Computer Expert and Renaissance Man
     
    #3

    Aug 2, 2009, 05:24 AM

    What will almost certainly disqualify you for retroactive support is that you never requested support. As Nikosmom said, Support is generally only granted from the date you file. Now, lets say you filed on 1/2/2009 and it took 8 months for the case to wind through the courts and an order finally granted. You could, then qualify for retro support back to 2/1/2009, but no further.

    His paying tuition will probably not affect anything, especially if he was the one insisting on the private school.
    stinawords's Avatar
    stinawords Posts: 2,071, Reputation: 150
    Ultra Member
     
    #4

    Aug 2, 2009, 07:09 AM

    These two answers are correct. Support is generally granted from the time it is filed for. 2003 is very long ago and I don't see any judge awarding that. Scott's example it what usually happens in court.
    gentlebreezee11's Avatar
    gentlebreezee11 Posts: 2, Reputation: 1
    New Member
     
    #5

    Aug 2, 2009, 05:16 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by stinawords View Post
    These two answers are correct. Support is generally granted from the time it is filed for. 2003 is very long ago and I don't see any judge awarding that. Scott's example it what usually happens in court.

    Thanks for your response.

    Gentlebreezee11

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Child Support - 2 child living at separate parents - 1 child turning 18 soon. [ 6 Answers ]

I will try not to make this too long but I went through a 3 year court battle with my ex with our 2 kids who are now 17 (Daughter) and 15 (Son). My son has been living with his dad since he was like 9 because I let him. Court battle was dropped due to judge thinking my ex was lying after 3 years...

Retroactive CA child support [ 3 Answers ]

My child's father went to prison right after she was born. I applied for welfare. Welfare sent him a letter for child support which obviously he could not pay. My child is 12 now. If I open the case now, does he owe for all that time or will it start now?

Overpaid the retroactive support order [ 17 Answers ]

I left home 10/07 and made payments in lieu of support (under verbal agreement), without an agreement or filing for divorce, until the eX filed in 4/08 (I had offered an MSA but it was never discussed or agreed upon). I continued to pay the mortgages on the home in lieu of support until 12/08 when...


View more questions Search