 |
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 21, 2009, 10:50 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Tj3
But it does NOT follow that anyone but Jesus is a priest over over others. The office of a priest is to be a bridge between man and God, and scripture is clear that there is only one mediator between man and God and that is Jesus.
The office of the priest/believers are to plant seed. Each can example that by feeding Truth of The Word. The Word being of Christ Jesus, the begotten Son of God, worthy to follow, and hear His voice which is found in what is written. And walking as He walked in righteousness according to His Father's Will. There is only One mediator, the Holy Spirit that was in Christ as he can also be within us.
 Originally Posted by Tj3
The reason that there is a priesthood of believers is that we are each able to come directly before God ourselves without needing to got to another priest. That in and of itself puts the rest the belief in the need of priests in the church.
More over would be, that The Holy Spirit will come to us and anoint us, Christ stands at the door and knocks. The Holy Spirit resides within us that do follow, and will keep us in His Ways.
Some men will say, God will keep you in all your ways... That is a lie! Because the Spirit resided within those that follow.. Christ did show us of satan's work in enticing words.
Hear Christ words: "Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God" Note: To walk outside the light is to tempt God...
Hear Christ words, "Man does not live by bread alone, but in every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God" The anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you.... (note he has come to you)... then anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you.... (note within you resided The Holy Spirit)ye need not that any man teach you.. (For He will guide you in His way) Psalms 91:11 For he shall give his angels charge over thee, to keep thee in all thy ways.
Each should question, what are thy ways when you walk in Christ? Thy ways are rigtheousness, the meat of The Word. Doing as Christ fulfilled for us to do, according to His way, His voice as one in Christ, just as Christ was one in His Father...
We must go beyond the milk of babes seeking His Ways
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 21, 2009, 11:00 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by arcura
sndbay,
I think we all agree that God IS above all and the Jesus IS THE high priest of all.
But as others have here said true Christians are priests and so are the Christian elders.
Some are ordained as the bible tells us by laying on of the hands.
Peace and kindness,
Fred
Discern and watch every word...
Did the scribe give the impression to the people that each knew scripture and the Word of God. Did each follow the Word of God?
Remember Fred what you had asked on another thread.. What did Christ know of man? Christ did know of the scribes which were sown with satan's sons as tares.
The Field of the World
Remember the parable of the tares... it is written and is His Words to hear.
Truth:
Christ is the Shepherd and Bishop of our souls. ( I Peter 2:25) Christ by whose stripes you were healed.
Scripture says, For we are labourers together with God: you are God's husbandry (a cultivated field), you are God's building. God increases as He Wilt, you can plant and water but neither are anything except that which God gives the increase. Which goes back to watch with causion the field of the world.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 21, 2009, 07:30 PM
|
|
Tj3,
So you believe but I do not.
I believe that Jesus selected His apostles for a purpose that reached beyond the time of His sacrifice.
That is to be the bishops (therefore priests) of His Church.
Nothing you can say or do will change my belief on that.
Peace and kindness,
Fred
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 21, 2009, 09:11 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by arcura
Tj3,
So you believe but I do not.
Yes, Fred, I do believe the Bible.
I believe that Jesus selected His apostles for a purpose that reached beyond the time of His sacrifice.
They helped to set the foundations of Christianity.
That is to be the bishops (therefore priests) of His Church.
You have not shown me any reason believe that a bishop is a priest.
Nothing you can say or do will change my belief on that.
Or, as it often seems... anything else :p
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 21, 2009, 09:47 PM
|
|
Tj3,
I also believe the bible.
Also if a Christian bishop is not a priest in you mind what are they, chopped liver?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 21, 2009, 09:53 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by arcura
Tj3,
I also believe the bible.
Also if a Christian bishop is not a priest in you mind what are they, chopped liver?
A Christian bishop is what scripture says that they are, leaders in the Christian church. If you think that they are specifically priests, why not just show us where scripture says that?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 21, 2009, 10:10 PM
|
|
Tj3,
I have no need to show you anything from the bible seen as you claim to know it so well.
I do NOT want to get into an argument with you about this.
I told you what I believe.
Either accept that of forget it.
Fred
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 21, 2009, 10:14 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by arcura
Tj3,
I have no need to show you anything from the bible seen as you claim to know it so well.
I guess neither of us know anyplace that scripture says that bishops are priests.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 21, 2009, 10:19 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by sndbay
This discussion went from all believers are priests, to the term "ministerial priests. And then there are the episkopoi, bishops, and diaconate.
#7 posting by Akoue: While it is true that Christ is the High Priest of the Church, this in no way militates against an ordained priesthood, established and expanded through the laying on of hands.
And Akoue was correct in his understanding of scripture and his statement regarding that understanding. So where is the lie in this? Or, is it that you just simply don't like the response. It conflicts somehow with what your subjective view of the Scripture.
We can have a view that all Christian faiths are equal, correct, and efficient in their duty to the flock, except, except, except Catholics. Is this what I'm reading?
 Originally Posted by sndbay
On to the Trinity, and the fact is the term is not in the scripture.
#9 posted by Tj3: Presbuteros is more properly translated as "elder". You'd be hard pressed to find a translation of the Bible translating presbuteros as priest other than Bible specific to Catholic denominations.
The first line in the quote above doesn't have anything to do with the 2nd paragraph.
You may have misunderstood one thing Akoue said about homoousious, and thought it wasn't correct. He was stating that the word Hmoousious is not found in scripture, yet we believe it to be true. This is true statement. For your information homoousious means 'consubstantial' or 'one in being'. This is the way you and I both think of the Trinity. Christ is “one in being” with the Father.
As to your second paragraph, presubteros was taken to mean ordained priests from Christ's commissioning of his Kingdom. The early church, (whether or not you want to call it Catholic or not, whether you can pick it out of Scripture or not), had ordained priests, bishops, deacons, and doctors. I fully realize your angst here; you have to ask yourself, if the early Catholic Church had ordained ministers then why not the Protestant and Evangelical Churches have ordained ministers. It could rightly be something you should consider.
Again I ask, who lied? Different views were given but no lies. Again, I guess this holds for all other Christian faiths except for Catholics – their views are to be taken as lies? Surly you're a bigger man than that?
 Originally Posted by sndbay
From posting # 2 from Tj3 thr posting # 5 by DeMaria, and #6 also: everyone agreed that believers are priests . So why would it be hard pressed to think of an elder as a priest, unless of course you think elers are not believers.
Yes, we all become participants in the sacrifice at mass. The Jewish religion held that only the priest gave up the sacrifice, only the priest entered the Holy of Holies. The mass is said in such a way so that all baptized Christians become priest-like in offering the sacrifice, and partaking in the Eucharist. Yet, it takes an ordained priest to offer the sacrifice; anybody else and the Eucharist becomes invalid.
So, where is the lie? Or, is it 'Catholic' you object to.
 Originally Posted by sndbay
My point is that with this entire discussion, the reality still remain that God is above all.
Agreed. Even still, you're being too myopic, nobody said that God wasn't the focus. In fact all of Catholic faith centers on Christ, centers on God, centers on the Holy Spirit. So where is the lie?
 Originally Posted by sndbay
And so all of this is least of importance, and because it is least important, in the end we are told the last will be first
Man can get so puffed up in pridefullness towards someone other then what is reality. In doing so they mock God...
This is strictly an opinion of what you 'think' Catholicism is about. “There are not a hundred people in America who hate the Catholic Church. There are millions of people who hate what they wrongly believe to be the Catholic Church— which is, of course, quite a different thing.” -foreward to Radio Replies Vol. 1, page ix, Archbishop Fulton Sheen. And I don't fault you for this; living less than 50 miles north of you, I fully understand how the misconception comes to play. It's OK not to be Catholic, but I really don't know how you can have a full loving relationship in faith without what's offered 'inside' the Church. What I'm saying is that I don't know how you can love God and hate His Kingdom. But, you work that one out; I've already made my bed in a Catholic pew, kneeling pad and all.
 Originally Posted by sndbay
There is only "One" of importance written in scripture... (John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God
And to live it ALL, FULLY, as best a man can, is to be Catholic.
 Originally Posted by sndbay
As is written: Gal 6:7 Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.
Gal 6:8 For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting.
Can it be seen and heard in scripture, how God tells us man is least?
That man, is only seen in his puffed up pride, and foolishness to think he is more then what he actually is? YES I know it does..
1 John 2:26 These things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you.
1 John 2:27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
God's Word of Truth!
I was seduced by God's absolute truth long ago, thanks be to God. I was seduced by the fact that God is Truth and all truth resides in God and Christ is the head of the Catholic Church, His Kingdom. No peff here, no dilutions, all references are checked and proven; my faith is rooted firmly in the fertile ground of 2,000 years of orthodox Catholic faith. (notice the little 'o')
 Originally Posted by sndbay
Jeremiah 9:4 Take ye heed every one of his neighbour, and trust ye not in any brother: for every brother will utterly supplant, and every neighbour will walk with slanders.
Jeremiah 9:5 And they will deceive every one his neighbour, and will not speak the truth: they have taught their tongue to speak lies, [and] weary themselves to commit iniquity.
~Trust in God
This is why I rely on the authority of the Magisterium so my neighbor doesn't influence my faith in One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church - Christ's Kingdom on Earth.
So, where is the lie?
JoeT
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 21, 2009, 10:39 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by JoeT777
This is why I rely on the authority of the Magisterium so my neighbor doesn’t influence my faith in One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church - Christ's Kingdom on Earth.
This is where we disagree. I rely upon God's word rather than the teachings of a denomination.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 21, 2009, 11:02 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Tj3
This is where we disagree. i rely upon God's word rather than the teachings of a denomination.
In the division of taxonomy are life, domain, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species in descending order. That is to say, species are subgroups of genus, genus along with all the subgroups of species are subgroups of family, etc, etc. Since all things are created, matter and life along with all the subgroups are of God. Since the Divine is the domain of Christ, all kingdoms along with subgroups belong to Christ. Since Christ is the prince of the kingdom and since the body of Christ, the Church, is a kingdom in the order of religions. Since the existence of all other Christian religions relies on the Church they rightly would be subgroups of the Church. Thus, ‘denomination’ is common to your species and ‘Kingdom’ is common to the Roman Catholic Church in the order of Christian faiths.
JoeT
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 21, 2009, 11:06 PM
|
|
Joe,
Great answers in that post.
I went to Mass in a nearby City this evening and was served by a marvelous humble priest.
Everyone in The Church was a priest, but only on was ordained.
I notice that some people do not understand The Church's teaching or the Magisterium and what it does or who leads and inspires it.
That's sad.
I sometime wonder if they purposely do not understand on purpose.
Peace and kindness,
Fred
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 22, 2009, 12:03 AM
|
|
THE ORDAINED PRIEST
As you may recall, Christ stated that he didn't come to destroy Judaism and the law, but rather to instill the law in the heart. “Do not think that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets. I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil”. Matt 5:17. Consider this in view of Old Testament priests who exercised a position of intermediary between man and God through the sacrifices.: "for every high priest taken from among men, is ordained for men in the things that appertain to God, that he may offer up gifts and sacrifices for sins" (cf. Hebrews 5:1) Consequently, Christ didn't abolish priesthood in the New Testament, but rather gave them the New Sacramental tools with which to mediate fulfilling salvific graces. The ordained priest dispenses saving graces through the sacraments.
As to the etymology of 'presbyteros' , 2,000 years of Catholic history has taught that the meaning in English is 'ordained priest'. The writings of all the Church Doctors understood presbyteros in this light, but we'll save the quotes for another thread. A priest is ordained, by lying on of hands, by bishops, which in turn get their authority from the successors of the Apostles. In the hierarchy of the Church this puts priests immediately after Bishops (which, by the way, are scripturally defined, along with deacons and doctors). Ordination is no small sacrament because it confers powers as opposed to rights. Such powers include celebrating mass, remission of sins, teaching, and administering of graces in the sacraments.
JoeT
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 22, 2009, 06:02 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by JoeT777
Since the Divine is the domain of Christ, all kingdoms along with subgroups belong to Christ. Since Christ is the prince of the kingdom and since the body of Christ, the Church, is a kingdom in the order of religions. Since the existence of all other Christian religions relies on the Church they rightly would be subgroups of the Church. Thus, 'denomination' is common to your species and 'Kingdom' is common to the Roman Catholic Church in the order of Christian faiths.
Though all kingdoms and subgroups belong to Christ, not all follow what He says in His word. Some may follow in whole, some may follow in part, but just because all kingdoms and churches are under his authority as God, it is wrong to say that everything done by any kingdom or church is automatically of God. That is, more often than not, not true.
Second, even in churches where they do teach sound doctrine, not all who are in those churches are saved.
Third, Jesus Himself said that not all who profess to follow Him actually do.
Thus your whole thesis falls apart.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 22, 2009, 06:16 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by JoeT777
THE ORDAINED PRIEST
As you may recall, Christ stated that he didn't come to destroy Judaism and the law, but rather to instill the law in the heart. “Do not think that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets. I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil”. Matt 5:17. Consider this in view of Old Testament priests who exercised a position of intermediary between man and God through the sacrifices.: "for every high priest taken from among men, is ordained for men in the things that appertain to God, that he may offer up gifts and sacrifices for sins" (cf. Hebrews 5:1) Consequently, Christ didn't abolish priesthood in the New Testament, but rather gave them the New Sacramental tools with which to mediate fulfilling salvific graces. The ordained priest dispenses saving graces through the sacraments.
A couple of problems with this logic:
1) If you are suggesting that the priesthood of your denomination is an extension of the OT priesthood, then they must all be of the Jewish tribe of Levi. I know for a fact that this neither true, nor a condition of entering the catholic priesthood.
2) The power of the OT priesthood to act as the mediator between God and man was ended when Jesus died and was resurrected, and when the curtain was torn which separated the Holy of Holies from the people. No longer was their a barrier, but with Jesus as the High Priest of our confession, we can come directly before the throne of God.
Heb 7:28
28 For the law appoints as high priests men who have weakness, but the word of the oath, which came after the law, appoints the Son who has been perfected forever.
NKJV
Heb 7:22-24
22 by so much more Jesus has become a surety of a better covenant. 23 Also there were many priests, because they were prevented by death from continuing. 24 But He, because He continues forever, has an unchangeable priesthood.
NKJV
As to the etymology of 'presbyteros' , 2,000 years of Catholic history has taught that the meaning in English is 'ordained priest'. The writings of all the Church Doctors understood presbyteros in this light, but we'll save the quotes for another thread. A priest is ordained, by lying on of hands, by bishops, which in turn get their authority from the successors of the Apostles. In the hierarchy of the Church this puts priests immediately after Bishops (which, by the way, are scripturally defined, along with deacons and doctors). Ordination is no small sacrament because it confers powers as opposed to rights. Such powers include celebrating mass, remission of sins, teaching, and administering of graces in the sacraments.
Again, this is specific to the teachings of your denomination, which by necessity must defend their practice of ordaining priests. It is your denomination (and affiliated denominations) that add the word "priest" to the definition of presbuteros.
Tell me, if God meant "priest" and not "elder) (as presbuteros rightly means), why did God not us the word "hiereus" which does mean priest and which is used throughout the NT with respect to the Jewish priesthood and with respect to Jesus as our high priest, but not one to any office in the leadership of the Christian church?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 22, 2009, 02:34 PM
|
|
Joe,
1 Tim 3: 15"the household of God, which is The Church of the living God, the pillar and bulwark of the truth."
Therefor you are right.
Peace and kindness,
Fred
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 22, 2009, 03:45 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by arcura
Joe,
1 Tim 3: 15"the household of God, which is The Church of the living God, the pillar and bulwark of the truth."
1 Tim 3:15-16
15 but if I am delayed, I write so that you may know how you ought to conduct yourself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.
NKJV
What does scripture say?
Rev 3:12
12 He who overcomes, I will make him a pillar in the temple of My God, and he shall go out no more. And I will write on him the name of My God and the name of the city of My God, the New Jerusalem, which comes down out of heaven from My God. And I will write on him My new name.
NKJV
So we see that individuals who "overcome" are the pillars. Who are those who overcome?
1 John 5:4-5
4 For whatever is born of God overcomes the world. And this is the victory that has overcome the world--our faith. 5 Who is he who overcomes the world, but he who believes that Jesus is the Son of God?
NKJV
1 John 2:14
I have written to you, young men,
Because you are strong, and the word of God abides in you,
And you have overcome the wicked one.
NKJV
There is much more in scripture, but it is clear that it those who are saved and have the word of God abiding in them. If the word of God abides in them, then the word of God preceded the church, and the pillars of the church are the individuals who are saved, which agrees with what we read in scripture:
1 Cor 12:26-28
27 Now you are the body of Christ, and members individually.
NKJV
The true church therefore is not a manmade organization, but it is the body of Christ, of overcomers, those who are saved and have the word of God abiding in them.
The physical church building represents the church insofar as it has the "pillars" to uphold the word of God within the church, if not, like any building without pillars, it falls. Further, the foundation is Jesus:
1 Cor 3:11-12
11 For no other foundation can anyone lay than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ.
NKJV
And where the pillars are absent, so is the foundation absent and again, the building must fall. No church organization/denomination can stand as a Church of God unless it has Jesus Christ as it's foundation and those who are saved and in whom the word of God abides as it's pillars.
Therefore the Church of the Living God is the body of all believers, not a denomination.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 22, 2009, 06:00 PM
|
|
That does not change the fact that Jesus founded His Church on earth with Peter as its first leader and gave to Peter the keys to heaven.
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Mar 22, 2009, 06:06 PM
|
|
Now arcura , what does facts have to do with it, if you are anti catholic and your denomination teaches against it.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Mar 22, 2009, 06:42 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by arcura
That does not change the fact that Jesus founded His Church on earth with Peter as its first leader and gave to Peter the keys to heaven.
Fred,
When I have your word versus what scripture says, I am afraid I have to go with what scripture says, which places Jesus as the one at the head of the church, and Jesus as the one with the keys.
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Check out some similar questions!
What Scripture verse show that Peter was the leader Part (3)
[ 30 Answers ]
Arcura originally asked “What Scripture verse show that Peter was the leader?”
As I understand Acura's question, it was meant to be fact finding in nature. The topic was closed before many of the verses could be discussed.
Part 2 of this question asked, “Can we find other similar...
What Scripture verse show that Peter was the leader? Part (2)
[ 137 Answers ]
Arcura asked “What Scripture verse show that Peter was the leader?” He writes:
I was very impressed with Rick's response (link)
Many have understood the Scripture to give Primacy to Peter since Christ's era. This can be illustrated in a letter written by Pope Clement I (third in...
View more questions
Search
|