Originally Posted by
tickle
Why do they want a new trial.? Trial De Nova essentially means that they want a new trial 'as if' no trial has been held before. Just curious.
The original amount claimed was for $3600. For house plan design services. In communications following receipt of contractor's price, defendants stated that the amount was more than they could finance. Documents presented and upheld in both courts supported an Implied in Fact Contract. The contractor appeared in court, stating that his bid for construction was under $100. / Sq.Ft. as he had stated in his initial contact with the defendants. A Licensed Structural Engineer appeared in court as an "expert witness", offering testimony that the plans were in compliance with Nationional and State building codes. The Magistrate ruled in my favor for the $3600. Defendants appealed to a Arbitration Court. Arbitrator ruled in my favor for the $3600. Plus court cost, plus 8% interest from Oct. 31, 2008.
My opinion is that they did not qualify for a loan, are trying to avoid the design fee plus interest, and delaying proceedings. He is a chiropractor and she is his office manager
