 |
|
|
 |
New Member
|
|
Oct 2, 2008, 11:10 AM
|
|
Private party used car fraud in CA, who pays?
Recently I purchased a 2000 BMW323i. The Seller produced a hand written Bill of Sale, which states "this vehicle includes a fully-paid transferable Warranty for an additional 2000miles, see Warranty for details". I was not provided a copy of the Warranty until I transferred it to my name. It does NOT state that the car is being sold AS IS.
He expressly Warranted the brakes saying "the brakes are new"
There were two issues, that I was told about, with the car at time of purchase. (1) The R front signal light was out. (2) The interior fan/blower wasn't working. The Seller said "you need to replace a fuse to make the fan work."
Regarding the Warranty, the Seller said "The warranty covers everything, all you have to do is pay the $100. deductible."
Within 48 hours several warning lights came on, on the dashboard. Among them, the radiator fluid light. I immediately called the Seller and he said, "oh, that comes on all the time. All you have to do is add water to the radiator and everything will be o.k.. Don't let them (the mechanics) talk you into anything, you don't need it." Consequently, I had to replace the RADIATOR, RADIATOR CAP, HOSES, AND FITTINGS. The Warranty paid for part of the cost, I paid the rest.
There was 1/32" left on BRAKES, front and back, and the car needs ROTORS. The "fuse" referred to by the Seller was not a fuse at all. It was a BLOWER CONTROL RESISTOR. (not covered by the Warranty)
The BRAKES, ROTORS, and BLOWER CONTROL RESISTOR, cost in the neighborhood of $1200. I have not replaced the BRAKES yet. The total cost of the RADIATOR was $877.34My share was approx. $375. The recovery amount I am seeking is $1575..
With regard to the Warranty, the Seller knew that the Warranty Co. does NOT cover 100% of the cost. I spoke with his mechanic, and the mechanic emphasized that the Seller was informed that the Warranty Co. will pay what they deem reasonable, Owner pays the rest.
To date, I have paid $1804.90. The Warranty Co. has paid $1160.22.
Do I have a case in Small Claims Court? If so, are there laws that cover this? If so, what do I refer to, to bolster my case?
Thank-you
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 2, 2008, 11:22 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Diane Levin
Recently I purchased a 2000 BMW323i. The Seller produced a hand written Bill of Sale, which states "this vehicle includes a fully-paid transferable Warranty for an additional 2000miles, see Warranty for details". I was not provided a copy of the Warranty until I transferred it to my name. It does NOT state that the car is being sold AS IS.
He expressly Warranted the brakes saying "the brakes are new"
There were two issues, that I was told about, with the car at time of purchase. (1) The R front signal light was out. (2) The interior fan/blower wasn't working. The Seller said "you need to replace a fuse to make the fan work."
Regarding the Warranty, the Seller said "The warranty covers everything, all you have to do is pay the $100. deductible."
Within 48 hours several warning lights came on, on the dashboard. Among them, the radiator fluid light. I immediately called the Seller and he said, "oh, that comes on all the time. All you have to do is add water to the radiator and everything will be o.k.. Don't let them (the mechanics) talk you into anything, you don't need it." Consequently, I had to replace the RADIATOR, RADIATOR CAP, HOSES, AND FITTINGS. The Warranty paid for part of the cost, I paid the rest.
There was 1/32" left on BRAKES, front and back, and the car needs ROTORS. The "fuse" referred to by the Seller was not a fuse at all. It was a BLOWER CONTROL RESISTOR. (not covered by the Warranty)
The BRAKES, ROTORS, and BLOWER CONTROL RESISTOR, cost in the neighborhood of $1200. I have not replaced the BRAKES yet. The total cost of the RADIATOR was $877.34My share was approx. $375. The recovery amount I am seeking is $1575..
With regard to the Warranty, the Seller knew that the Warranty Co. does NOT cover 100% of the cost. I spoke with his mechanic, and the mechanic emphasized that the Seller was informed that the Warranty Co. will pay what they deem reasonable, Owner pays the rest.
To date, I have paid $1804.90. The Warranty Co. has paid $1160.22.
Do I have a case in Small Claims Court? If so, are there laws that cover this? If so, what do I refer to, to bolster my case?
Thank-you
If the car was sold as is and the seller can prove it, I see no case.
If it was NOT sold as is and you can prove it, I see a case.
You can always go to Small Claims Court and se what a Judge decides.
|
|
 |
Computer Expert and Renaissance Man
|
|
Oct 2, 2008, 11:24 AM
|
|
You talk about what the Seller "said" But what was put in writing? That's what matters unless you have witnesses to back up what he said orally.
The bill of sale states that you were getting a waraanty and you got a warranty. Unless the warranty or the Bill of Sale states a $100 deductible, then you still have the burden of proof that you were told different.
With the brakes, if you have proof you were told they are new, you have a claim. Otherwise not.
A bill of Sale doesn't have to say AS IS, its implied with a private sale.
So frankly, I'm not sure you have any cause of action at all. But it doesn't cost much to go to small lcaims court so it won't hurt much to try.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Oct 2, 2008, 11:58 AM
|
|
I don't see a case here. You should have taken this car and had your trusted mechanic check it out before you forked over a dime. Essentially with used cars it's Buyer Beware in neon lights. You got taken all right, but hopefully you will have learned your lesson on relying on what the previous owner said. Take it to a mechanic to be checked out period.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
Oct 2, 2008, 01:17 PM
|
|
And just to throw in my two cents... warranties often do not cover the full cost of fixing things. It's generally that they will pay what they consider the "normal" cost of doing the repair, and if the person actually doing it charges more, you get to pay the difference. You also run into a problem with what he meant by "everything". Did he mean it pays for the full costs, or that it covered all the major systems, and wasn't the more common "power train and brakes" warranty. So you may not have much to stand on in that case. You may be able to get him to pay for the brakes, if he wrote down that they were new. But that will just get you the difference in the cost between new brakes and what is currently on the car.
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
How do I get car title from a private party
[ 4 Answers ]
I bought a car from a friend. Have had the car for over a year and it is paid off. The friend said he was working on getting the lost title but I never got it. He has since moved to another state and refuses to return my call. I now have a car that I have no title to cannot register or get...
Private party leinholder
[ 5 Answers ]
I am trying to recover a vehicle that I let a man make monthly payments to me . I am not a finance company or bank. I'm a private party leinholder and so its states so on the title, the man is a month behind on his payment, I want to repo vehicle and hold it till he can come up with the money to...
Sold to/by private party, am I responsible
[ 9 Answers ]
My son sold a truck last week. We never had it checked out by a mechanic but thought it ran well. The guy who purchased it took it for a test drive and gave my son the asking price. Today I received a voicemail that the truck is in the shop, blown head gasket, etc. We did state the truck ran...
Used Car Case - Private Party
[ 6 Answers ]
I stay in California and I had bought the car just 2 months ago from a private party . The car needed some repairs ( Cold start problem ) and after I bought the car , the mechanic fixed the problem by placing some part in a tank overnight to clean it up and did some tuning on the car .
Now I had...
California private party used car law
[ 2 Answers ]
When buying a used car in California, does the buyer have any recourse if the car renders inoperative within 90 days of purchase and there is no written contract.
View more questions
Search
|