 |
|
|
 |
-
|
|
Jul 10, 2008, 03:56 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by N0help4u
N0 God No big bang What do YOU believe brought us into existence?
Nobody knows what precisely caused the universe to appear. But that does not support the wild religious claim of the God deity... That claim is a primitive man's presentation of how the universe appeared. I prefer the explanation supported by 21' Century science...
:rolleyes:
·
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Jul 10, 2008, 04:14 PM
|
|
Like I said I am not saying it does support the claims
I am sure you must have some idea of how we got here
But you never want to say what your ideas are.
|
|
 |
-
|
|
Jul 10, 2008, 04:26 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by N0help4u
Like I said I am not saying it does support the claims
I am sure you must have some idea of how we got here
but you never want to say what your ideas are.
I stated that nobody knows what precisely caused the universe to appear.
Why do you need any other answer ? Why do you insist on a nonsensical explanation involving a so far invisible deity with supra-natural capacities and a strange interest in my and your sex life?
:p
·
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Jul 10, 2008, 04:29 PM
|
|
I have never asked you or anybody for explanations of an invinsible deity.
I never had any strange interest in your sex life either. As I recall you were the one always boosting about that.
|
|
 |
-
|
|
Jul 10, 2008, 04:47 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by N0help4u
I have never asked you or anybody for explanations of an invinsible deity.
Invinsible? Invisible : so far nobody has ever seen God. So if she exist she must be invisible !
 Originally Posted by N0help4u
I never had any strange interest in your sex life either. As I recall you were the one always boosting about that.
I never boast about my sex life. All I told here is that I have 3 children and six grandchildren (so far). You call that boasting?
:D ;) :p :rolleyes: :D
·
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Jul 10, 2008, 04:52 PM
|
|
Invinsible? Invisible : so far nobody has ever seen God. So if she exist she must be invisible !
That is your conclusion (belief?) because you don't know God could be living on Venus for all anybody knows AND have a visible body.
LOL on answerway you went on about how great your sex life was, not detail but that it was great.
|
|
 |
-
|
|
Jul 10, 2008, 04:57 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by N0help4u
That is your conclusion (belief?) because you don't know God could be living on Venus for all anybody knows AND have a visible body.
Reason why I stated : "If she exist" .
One more : READ and PROCESS what I post and only than react with more than the babble you produce now...
:rolleyes:
·
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Jul 10, 2008, 05:00 PM
|
|
Read and comprehend what I am saying only THEN reply
|
|
 |
-
|
|
Jul 10, 2008, 05:03 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by N0help4u
Read and comprehend what I am saying only THEN reply
All you do is babbling...
:rolleyes:
·
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Jul 10, 2008, 07:12 PM
|
|
You must really enjoy my *babble* since you have 10 yrs of it on hard disc
|
|
 |
Junior Member
|
|
Jul 11, 2008, 08:05 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by N0help4u
hmmm if he sold his business two years ago who is he paying and for what????
Hmmm good question Nohelp. I wonder... his statements are always very incosistant.
|
|
 |
Junior Member
|
|
Jul 11, 2008, 08:21 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Credendovidis
Nobody knows what precisely caused the universe to appear. But that does not support the wild religious claim of the God deity .... That claim is a primitive man's presentation of how the universe appeared. I prefer the explanation supported by 21' Century science ...·
So you BELIEVE in the CLAIMS made by Darwinists and Big Bang theorisers (which I must add are NOT SCIENCE) and we believe in the claims made by the Bible.
Niether have been irrefutably proven.
So what makes you better than us?
|
|
 |
-
|
|
Jul 12, 2008, 06:08 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by sassyT
So you BELIEVE in the CLAIMS made by Darwinists and Big Bang theorisers
No I don't. And I never did believe in these. I accept the objective supporting evidence provided as a frame guideline to what really happened so long ago (and what still is happening today).
You know that very well, but you seem to have run out of any other argument , I see.
So you refer to lying and misrepresentation, although you know that you are doing that.
It's called hypocrisy and bigotry...
:rolleyes:
·
|
|
 |
Junior Member
|
|
Jul 14, 2008, 02:35 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Credendovidis
No I don't. And I never ??did believe in these. I accept the objective supporting evidence provided as a frame guideline to what really happened so long ago (and what still is happening today).
·
Mmm... This is a very contradicting statement. You claim you don't believe but in the same breath you say you accept the evidence. :rolleyes:
|
|
 |
-
|
|
Jul 14, 2008, 05:00 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by sassyT
mmm...This is a very contradicting statement. You claim you dont believe but in the same breath you say you accept the evidence.
You suggested originally :
 Originally Posted by sassyT
So you BELIEVE in the CLAIMS made by Darwinists and Big Bang theorisers
To which I reacted :
 Originally Posted by Credendovidis
No I don't. And I never did believe in these. I accept the objective supporting evidence provided as a frame guideline to what really happened so long ago (and what still is happening today).
So what I stated was actually : " No I don't BELIEVE in the CLAIMS made by Darwinists and Big Bang theorisers".
And please note that I also made a qualification (I know this seems very hard for you to do, but still try to read and digest what I stated) : I introduced the term "frame guideline".
" I accept the objective supporting evidence provided as a frame guideline to what really happened so long ago".
So I accept the (scientific) evidence as a frame guideline to what happened.
I did not state that I believe this way or that. I did not state that the (scientific) evidence is 100%. The frame guideline is accepted. The main lines are accepted. Evolution as a proper explanation for evolution, or the Big Bang as a proper explanation for the Origin of the Universe.
So there is nothing contradicting in that statement at all.
:D :D :D :D :D
·
|
|
 |
Junior Member
|
|
Jul 15, 2008, 09:06 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Credendovidis
You suggested originally : To which I reacted :
So what I stated was actually : "No I don't BELIEVE in the CLAIMS made by Darwinists and Big Bang theorisers".
And please note that I also made a qualification (I know this seems very hard for you to do, but still try to read and digest what I stated) : I introduced the term "frame guideline".
"I accept the objective supporting evidence provided as a frame guideline to what really happened so long ago".
So I accept the (scientific) evidence as a frame guideline to what happened.
I did not state that I believe this way or that. I did not state that the (scientific) evidence is 100%. The frame guideline is accepted. The main lines are accepted. Evolution as a proper explanation for evolution, or the Big Bang as a proper explanation for the Origin of the Universe.
So there is nothing contradicting in that statement at all.
·
:rolleyes:
|
|
 |
-
|
|
Jul 16, 2008, 04:05 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by sassyT
...
Yes... Difficult to argue my previous last post (#115)
Has mental sanity finally arrived ?
:rolleyes:
·
|
|
 |
Junior Member
|
|
Jul 16, 2008, 10:01 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Credendovidis
Yes ... Difficult to argue my previous last post (#115)
Has mental sanity finally arrived ?
:rolleyes:
·
You are just contradicting and reppeating yourself you are just starting to sound like an old broken record. :rolleyes:
|
|
 |
-
|
|
Jul 16, 2008, 06:41 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by sassyT
You are just contradicting and reppeating yourself you are just starting to sound like an old broken record.
And your post are becoming dumber and dumber...
Note that I do not " reppeat" myself. I do not even repeat myself.
You ran out of sane comments already a long time ago.
Now you seem to have run out of any argumentation also, sassyT!!
:D :rolleyes: :p ;) :D
·
|
|
 |
Junior Member
|
|
Jul 17, 2008, 09:31 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by Credendovidis
And your post are becoming dumber and dumber ....
Note that I do not "reppeat" myself. I do not even repeat myself.
You ran out of sane comments already a long time ago.
Now you seem to have run out of any argumentation also, sassyT !!!
·
What argument?. lol all I am waiting for is evidence for your BELIEFS. I am getting tired of waiting. You haven't given any O.S.E for your beliefs. :rolleyes:
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Check out some similar questions!
Creation
[ 10 Answers ]
... a different kind
In the beginning, God created the Heavens and the Earth and
Populated the Earth with broccoli, cauliflower and spinach, green
And yellow and red vegetables of all kinds, so Man and Woman would
Live long and healthy lives.
Then using God's great gifts, Satan created...
Website creation
[ 1 Answers ]
I have downloaded a web page maker and I have created my site but when I publish my site it won't let do it why
Creation of 0V neutral
[ 4 Answers ]
When an emf is generated in the alternator both poles are simultaneously 0V or at polar opposites in varying degrees of voltage. However in the supply circuit the live is +tve or -tve in varying degrees of voltage & the neutral remains at 0V.
So the question is, what happens after the...
Creation science
[ 13 Answers ]
I know this one's old, but I hadn't seen it in awhile...
“God”, a Scientist exclaims, “we don't need you anymore. We've finally figured out how to create life out of nothing: We can now do what you did in the beginning."
God’s eyebrows raise: "Oh, is that so? Tell me... "
"Well, " says...
View more questions
Search
|