Quote:
Jihadist attacks on America since 911 are being handled very nicely by intelligence sharing, police work, snitches, surveillance, CIA activities, FBI activities... and, no thanks to Bush's war of Adventurism which has given just the motivation needed for Jihadist leaders to drive up the roles of membership in their various death groups.
What nonsense !
The very means that Bush has used to fight terrorism in the country has been widely criticized by the left . The methods you describe without the revisions since 9-11 led to the attack on 9-11 .
You don't think so ? FBI agent, Harry Sammit,pleaded with his superiors at FBI headquarters to be allowed to launch a nationwide manhunt for Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf Al-Hazmi, two of the hijackers of the plane that was crashed into the Pentagon , 3 weeks before 9/11. He was turned down by the lawyers in the National Security Law Unit of the FBI, who cited the FISA law that prevented this intelligence information from being used by the criminal division.
Sammit wrote in an email, on Aug. 31, 2001:
“Someday someone will die…and the public will not understand why we were not more effective and throwing everything we had at certain problems. Let's hope [the lawyers] will stand behind their decisions then, expecially since the biggest threat to us now, [bin laden], is getting the most protection.”
If Mohammed Atta had been picked up in Afghanistan while training for his mission to attck the US ;this decision would mean that he would be able to get himself an ACLU lawyer who would file all types of discovery for evidence the US could not surrender to the court lest it compromises other intel operations . He would most likey either get his case dismissed or tie up the courts at the tax payer expense for years .
Like I said in my other reply to you . This is possibly the goofiest most irresponsilbe decision in the history of SCOTUS .
