If you wait a bit longer then Win 8.1 is due for release soon. They decided to put the start button / classic style back in as an option.
![]() |
If you wait a bit longer then Win 8.1 is due for release soon. They decided to put the start button / classic style back in as an option.
Windows "Blue" was in the media recently. A lot was discussed about it, though the restoration of the Start button was not fully confirmed.
And I don't see how its restoration destroys the purpose of Win 8 at all. Microsoft removed it because they felt the new interface was better and wanted users to give it a shot. But I don't think they realized how it requires touch to make it better. Also, how corporate America would react. Giving the option to boot to the desktop with a start button, will help speed adoption of Win 8 in the business environment.
What I don't understand is why they didn't just create a separate touch screen mobile version for phones touch laptops and tablets and continue from Win7 with desktop OS versions as normal. It seems to me that their insistence of having one for all is what has hurt them the most. A desktop OS can be a 10gig install but that makes little sense for a tiny phone or tablet. So trying for the all in one seems silly at best. Since they already admit that Win8 is basically a tweaked Win7 and the path to creation was short, why not WinTouch 1.0 and continue with Win8 for desktops for a future release. I can almost hear the chorus of DOH! In the Redmond halls.
That decision hurt the whole industry. Its sad to see. A dual version at installation would have been the right way to go so you can pick what is going to be installed. All they had to do was add 1 layer to it. Now the industry is in an uproar over the whole mess.
I can tell you part of the thinking. There was definitely complaints from a lot of people about having to have to deal with multiple OSes. Having to go from one interface on their desktop to a different one on their tablet to a different one on their phones. Microsoft felt, and I agree, that since they were late to the phone/tablet market, they needed something special to differentiate themselves. They decided, and again I agree, that giving people a single interface on all platforms could be that differentiator.
Where they went wrong, In my opinion, was in thinking that corporate desktops were ready for touch. And that the tiled interface would work well on a non touch device.
I use startmenu8. I have put it onto dozens of customer computers who won't pay for a downgrade.
IObit Start Menu 8 Free download, Bring Start Menu back to Windows 8
Trusted by me. And they give you a few cool configuration options. Also you can right click on your new startmenu to bring up the windows 8 tiles. Or left click to get a windows 7 style menu.
Did I mention Free!
Can't we all just say screw I'm going Linux till Microsoft gets their *bleep* together
All OS's have their ups and downs. Microsoft dominates the general market in OS's, and still stays on top with xp and 7 operating 83.03% of personal computers, 91.78% if you include other supported OS's. Also, 29.06% of Gaming consoles run Microsoft software, 35.00% of web servers are Windows based, 35.80% of Real-Time based OS's are Windows.
Microsoft stock has been holding steady since 2004 with only a few minor short lived dips.
Microsoft is leading in options and features as well with compatibility.
Down hill?
I personally use an app called StartisBack (StartIsBack - real start menu in Windows 8). It's free for 30 days, but costs $3 to buy. It pretty much makes it look exactly like Windows 7 desktop, but there are some extra options that you can configure. For instance you can set it up to have the PC boot directly to the desktop with start button, you can disable the corner shortcuts, etc. Still not free, but I loved this one so much that I think it's worth the 3 bones.
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:43 PM. |