Originally Posted by
cultrshk
No offense, but we are each individuals, with individual tolerances-across a lot of areas of life, psychological, physical, and most likely nutritional. The "science" of medicine is based largely on case studies. The most "shaky" and least generalizable of all the research-based studies. Why? because medicine and society used to understand we are heterogeneous creatures. The food that might be right for my body is not as helpful to yours.
Fasting is a time honored tradition for many cultures-and they survived for thousands of years. Americans, at least, (and maybe some people in EU countries-I have no idea) are not comfortable with being uncomfortable, as a general rule. Our knee jerk response is "oh no! that will be so unhealthy"
I think a thoughtful individual would take it "a day at a time". Pay attention to what your body is telling you. If you are so weak and tired or you feel like you can't take another step-you need to stop. I would interpret it as your body saying "we're not wired for this and it isn't helpful". The positive stories of juicing should be weighed equally with the negative. It may work for you. It may not.
Just a note: Western medicine is very concerned with the "why". If something works, we want to study it and know why. If we can't find the "why" we ask a heterogenous sample of people to do it-and if, on average, this large group of many different people, do not show an effect-we chalk it up all previous successes to the placebo effect. God forbid, a few people actually show negative effects-well then the whole thing is absolutely null. In this regard, we are being very simplistic as a scientific society. We are engaging in "all or nothing" thinking in our sample selection.
This is just a thought. Remember you may "commit" to a 30 or 60 day fast, but be careful not to "make" yourself engage in it if your body is saying "uh. no" for a prolonged period. If it doesn't work, don't force it.
The preceding was my humble opinion. I am not an MD, just a PhD.