Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    andremoreau2001's Avatar
    andremoreau2001 Posts: 1, Reputation: 1
    New Member
     
    #1

    May 8, 2007, 07:30 AM
    Expandidng Universe
    What is the universe expanding inside of?
    Capuchin's Avatar
    Capuchin Posts: 5,255, Reputation: 656
    Uber Member
     
    #2

    May 8, 2007, 09:33 AM
    The universe is all that there is, it doesn't need something to expand into, it expands within itself.
    Curlyben's Avatar
    Curlyben Posts: 18,514, Reputation: 1860
    BossMan
     
    #3

    May 8, 2007, 09:46 AM
    You know I have always wondered that as well.
    Cap, your answer doesn't really explain anything.
    Now is this because our understanding of what is "outside" the universe so scant that we truly have no idea ?

    I always thought of the universe expanding like a balloon being blown up with air, but obviously not, or maybe, who knows!
    Capuchin's Avatar
    Capuchin Posts: 5,255, Reputation: 656
    Uber Member
     
    #4

    May 8, 2007, 10:07 AM
    Okay I shan't get into semantics here. Universe means "all turned into one". It means "all that there is that exists, including time and space". If we discover a point outside the universe, it immediately becomes inside our universe, because that's what universe means.

    Let's ignore this and assume that there can be something outside the universe that isn't included in our definition of universe... does it need to be there for expansion?

    The ballon analogy you use only goes so far, curly. It illustrates how a 2D surface can expand from within all points on that space. Analogously, our universe expands in 4D space. If you look at the balloon, the 2D space doesn't expand into anything in it's 2 dimensional space, it gets bigger without expanding into anything. In this same way, our 4D universe expands without expanding into anything.

    Now I can see what you're going to say "the balloon expands into unoccupied space in the third dimension". You'll have to accept my word on this, the third dimension is not needed to mathematically expand a 2D surface. It does not need a space to expand into. The 4D version of this, without need for a higher dimensional space to expand into, is our best guess at how universal expansion works.

    It really doesn't need any space to expand into... You need to remember that the surface of the balloon, like our universe, is unbounded.

    Please ask further if I've failed to make it clear yet (I'm sure that's entirely possible), and I will do my best to keep explaining :)
    asterisk_man's Avatar
    asterisk_man Posts: 476, Reputation: 32
    Full Member
     
    #5

    May 9, 2007, 12:02 PM
    I agree with capuchin.
    In addition, discussions of things outside the universe have no value. As capuchin implied, the universe is defined as all the things which we can observe in some way. Anything outside the universe can not have any influence on us and therefore is irrelevant. Any discussion on such a topic may be fun but will ultimately result in pure speculation. I could say that the universe is expanding inside of anything I want... but it doesn't matter because I could never be proven correct or incorrect.
    Besides, I could also argue that the universe isn't expanding, the resolution is just increasing. :)
    Sneppahtihs's Avatar
    Sneppahtihs Posts: 5, Reputation: 1
    New Member
     
    #6

    Jun 21, 2007, 04:21 PM
    Curleyben illustrates the biggest common problem with the balloon analogy of the expanding universe. As Capuchin explained, the expanding universe can be described as the surface of an inflating balloon. The area inside the balloon and outside of the balloon do not exist as far as the analogy is concerned.

    Time and space began with the big bang. What exists outside of time and space? No, God does not count as an answer.
    Capuchin's Avatar
    Capuchin Posts: 5,255, Reputation: 656
    Uber Member
     
    #7

    Jun 21, 2007, 10:26 PM
    It could be more time and space, it could be a whole universe dominated with clowns, it could be flatland, it could be nothing. Whatever it is, it is currently both unobservable and undetectable. So the discussion is not particularly useful until we have evidence that infers it's existence.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

How does our understanding of life in the universe affect our knowledge of ourselves? [ 2 Answers ]

I was just wondering what other peoples opinion is on this matter.

Acceleration of universe expansion [ 3 Answers ]

Why is there acceleration in universe expansion?

The Expansion Of The Universe [ 1 Answers ]

Hello, my name is Nathanael Turner, I am 15 years old so my analogy may not be 'correct' but you get the general picture: My Question: 1)Will the universe carry on expanding for an infinate amount of time? OR 2)Will its mass eventually cause it to impload under its own gravitational...

The Universe [ 3 Answers ]

Is the Universe symmetrical? I know it's contantly expanding, but are all sides expanding at the same rate?

Laws of the Natural Universe [ 2 Answers ]

1. Law of Mechanical Repair: After your hands become coated with grease, your nose will begin to itch or you'll have to pee. 2. Law of the Workshop: Any tool, when dropped, will roll to the least accessible corner. 3. Law of Probability: The probability of being watched is directly...


View more questions Search