Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    western50's Avatar
    western50 Posts: 105, Reputation: 1
    Junior Member
     
    #1

    Jul 5, 2011, 08:40 PM
    parametric formulas
    1. Are the lines with parametric formulas
    Subscript[L, 1][t]={2,3}+ t{-3,5}
    and
    Subscript[L, 2][t]={2,3}+ t{6,-10}
    the same line or different lines? These two formulas are different line because their expressions for parallel vector are not the same, right? I am not sure how I should explain this problem.
    Unknown008's Avatar
    Unknown008 Posts: 8,076, Reputation: 723
    Uber Member
     
    #2

    Jul 5, 2011, 08:58 PM

    The simple fact that they don't have the same vector direction says that they are not the same lines. It's pretty similar to the linear equations you learned previously.

    If you have two lines with the same gradient, there is a good chance that they are the same line.

    So first, you verify the gradient (vector) then you verify the point. If a line has the same gradient (vector) and go through the same points (usually, only one point is required), then the equations represent the same line.

    Can you find the vectors of the lines?
    jcaron2's Avatar
    jcaron2 Posts: 986, Reputation: 204
    Senior Member
     
    #3

    Jul 5, 2011, 09:02 PM
    They're the same line. The parameter t for one line is NOT the same as the t for the other line, but if you include all values for t from -infinity to infinity, they trace out the same path. If you choose any value of t for the second equation L2(t), you can get the same result with the first equation L1(t) by simply using t_1 = -2t_2.

    Hopefully that makes sense. I don't think my explanation is a very good one. Let me know if you want clarification.

    jcaron2's Avatar
    jcaron2 Posts: 986, Reputation: 204
    Senior Member
     
    #4

    Jul 5, 2011, 09:15 PM
    Another way to approach this problem, by the way, is to convert from parametric equations back into good ol' fashioned slope-intercept form if that's what you're more comfortable with.

    L1 = {2,3}+ t{-3,5}

    This can be rewritten as a system of two equations in x and y:

    x = 2 -3t
    y = 3 + 5t

    Solving the first for t, we get t = -(x-2)/3. Plugging that into the second, we get y = -5/3x + 19/3.

    Now you can do the same thing with the second equation for L2, and you'll find you end up with exactly the same slope-intercept-form equation.


Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Create the formulas for the 10 column accounting worksheet using Excel formulas? [ 3 Answers ]

I need help with the formulas for the 10 column accounting worksheet using Excel IF function?

Using parametric equations to produce one curve (written as x = x(t) and y= y(t) [ 0 Answers ]

that has the following characteristics: At t=0, the curve starts at the point (-4,4), travels to (3,-1) along an interesting non linear path, and returns to (-4,4) along a curved path that is a reflection of the path from (-4,4) to (3,-1) across the line through (-4,4) and (3,-1). Describe...

Parametric equations [ 5 Answers ]

x=t-2sint, y=1-2cost show that the curve crosses the x axis where t=pi/3 and t=5pi/3 I understand that you have to solve y=0 but alli can get is t=pi/3

Calc. Empirical formulas and molecular formulas [ 1 Answers ]

:eek! : a sample is made of 18g of C and 81.5g of H... the molecular mass of the compound is 104g/mole calc. the empirical formula... calc. the molecular formula OK.. so I got the moles, I think.:confused: . C= 18g X 1mole = 1.4987g 1 ...


View more questions Search