|
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Apr 29, 2011, 11:03 AM
|
|
That they climate change is causing more turbulent weather.
Where did you see in that article that the people who reject the science caused the tornadoes?
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Apr 29, 2011, 11:24 AM
|
|
This is what I got from the article... Thinkprogress thinks that C02 is 'greenhouse pollution'.
That and yes ;they make a bizarre and irrelevant connection between the votes taken by those States Congressional delegations and the tornados .
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Apr 29, 2011, 02:08 PM
|
|
The latest "deniers "??
Craig Fugate, administrator of FEMA and Grady Dixon, assistant professor of meteorology and climatology at Mississippi State University.
the stronger-than-usual tornadoes affecting the southern states were actually predicted from examining the planet's climatological patterns, specifically those related to the La Nina phenomenon.
"We knew it was going to be a big tornado year," he said. But the key to that tip-off was unrelated to climate change: "It is related to the natural fluctuations of the planet."
Tornadoes whipped up by wind, not climate: officials - FRANCE 24
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Apr 29, 2011, 02:15 PM
|
|
We should stay on topic. Start another thread if you wish.
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Apr 29, 2011, 02:17 PM
|
|
Thus the site moderator spoketh.
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Apr 29, 2011, 02:20 PM
|
|
Correct. Do it.
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Apr 29, 2011, 02:24 PM
|
|
Bwaaa haaa haaa .
This is Ex's OP and he brought up the climate change angle.
I'll gladly comply if he makes such a request.
|
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Apr 29, 2011, 03:52 PM
|
|
Originally Posted by tomder55
This is what I got from the article.....Thinkprogress thinks that C02 is 'greenhouse pollution'.
That and yes ;they make a bizzare and irrelevent connection between the votes taken by those States Congressional delegations and the tornados .
Hi Tom,
I think you are right. Perhaps the article is intended as tongue-in-cheek.
It's a bit like saying the Linconshire ( Newton's birth place) city council has voted to reject Einstein's theory of Relativity because they reject the possibility that space can be curved.
Tut
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Apr 29, 2011, 04:19 PM
|
|
A bit of a tongue in cheek response Tut .
It of course assumes the connection of the Congressional delegation voting on a position based on their 'denial' rather than other considerations like budgetary .
... That and the difference between an established proven theory like 'Relativity' opposed to a very debatable hypothesis.
|
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Apr 29, 2011, 04:36 PM
|
|
Originally Posted by tomder55
a bit of a tongue in cheek response Tut .
It of course assumes the connection of the Congressional delegation voting on a position based on their 'denial' rather than other considerations like budgetary .
....That and the difference between an established proven theory like 'Relativity' opposed to a very debatable hypothesis.
Hi Tom,
Sounds like you have made a reasonable interpretation of the article to me.
As for the science of climate change... I'm not going there again.
Tut
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Apr 29, 2011, 05:07 PM
|
|
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
I like your analogy particularly the part of "no true democracy would start a war". This argument can be used against BO on so many levels but I will let you think of them
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Apr 29, 2011, 05:23 PM
|
|
Originally Posted by paraclete
I like your analogy particularly the part of "no true democracy would start a war". This argument can be used against BO on so many levels but I will let you think of them
Correct. Obama is more like Bush than one could ever have imagined.
Just a note: I never used any analogy that used the words "no true democracy would start a war".
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Apr 29, 2011, 11:59 PM
|
|
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
Correct. Obama is more like Bush than one could ever have imagined.
Just a note: I never used any analogy that used the words "no true democracy would start a war".
They are embedded in the article, should be careful to read your example
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Apr 30, 2011, 02:00 AM
|
|
Originally Posted by paraclete
They are embedded in the article, should be careful to read your example
Then it's best to use text that refers to the article's mention of it, so instead of saying "I like your analogy particularly the part.. " it's best to say "I like the analogy they make... " and quote the link, not my words. Thanks.
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Apr 30, 2011, 05:02 PM
|
|
Now don't go allover PC on me NK
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Apr 30, 2011, 07:54 PM
|
|
Hello again,
I've been thinking... Does anybody really believe that Hawaii is part of the United States?? Come on. They're obviously, not American. More likely, Samoan... Maybe even, Chinese...
So, I wrote a letter to the Governor of Hawaii and asked him to produce his statehood papers... He hasn't responded. What's he hiding? Why doesn't he just show it? What's on it he doesn't want us to see?
I've sent a couple of investigators over there to get to the bottom of it. What they tell me so far isn't good... It looks like Kenya bought Hawaii when we weren't looking...
excon
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Apr 30, 2011, 11:54 PM
|
|
Well there you are ex and you can kick those other pretenders Peutro Rica out while you are at it, they are hispanic don't you know and could never be true americans and how about Alaska and Lousiana, you bought those and New Mexico, California, Nevada and Texas, you stole those. Doesn't leave much that is authentic does it? Utah maybe?
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
May 1, 2011, 05:41 AM
|
|
Originally Posted by paraclete
and New Mexico, California, Nevada and Texas, you stole those. Doesn't leave much that is authentic does it? Utah maybe?
Don't mess with Texas, dude.
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
May 1, 2011, 05:48 AM
|
|
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Don't mess with Texas, dude.
What a tired meaningless old saying to trot out. What does it actually mean? "Nothing" is the answer.
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
May 1, 2011, 05:59 AM
|
|
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
What a tired meaningless old saying to trot out. What does it actually mean? "Nothing" is the answer.
Another useless contribution by the site monitor.
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Birthers again?
[ 51 Answers ]
No, truthers, this time right in Obama's administration. Obama's "green jobs" czar Van Jones got caught with his 9/11 truther pants down, signing a petition suggesting it was an inside job.
Jones now says the petition "does not reflect my views now or ever," even though he won't explain how his...
View more questions
Search
|