First, its up to the prosecuting attorney to argue against bail. They use the nature of the crime, the filght risk of the accused and their criminal history to convince the judge that bail should not be allowed. It's the arraignment judge's decision as to whether bail should be allowed or not. And too often that decision is based on how crowded the jails are rather than the accused's danger to society.
Without knowing the nature of the crime, the history of the defendant, etc. Its hard to judge whether the judge's actions were correct or not. I can tell you that it is no reflection against you, but the realities of the criminal justice system.
Was a restraining order issued against him? If not the DA should go back and get one. In that way, if he violates the order, bail can be revoked.
|