
Originally Posted by
happyjackie
It is not a sub lease. The only paperwork they have names on is the 614 which states that by paying rent they do not become fellow leaseholders. I have no lease with them. because of the 614s the landlord has always known about them, however he claims that he presently has "two occupants and no master tenant because the master tenant is unable to gain entry". I was able to get in four days ago to take measurements, right before they changed the locks. So, I served a three day eviction notice today. Is it possible they can use the laws to squat for several months until the landlord goes through this nightmare too?
By "sub-lease" I meant renting from you. "Sub-let" perhaps would be a better way to put it if there is nothing in writing.
I don't know what a "614" is, but the statement that they are not fellow leaseholders is a truism: they didn't sign the lease and weren't assigned an interest in it, so clearly they aren't.
I disagree with the landlord's interpretation that you aren't the "master tenant". You are, whether you are physically capable of getting inside. In fact, you should probably hire a locksmith and have a key made so that you will be able to get in. But be aware that if you make it so that their key won't work, you could be accused of wrongful ouster and expose yourself to liabilty. It's an interesting question.
It's likely that if the 3-day notice is sufficient under California law and you are then able to sue them for eviction, you will have them out within the required 30 days. But one never knows for sure.
Whatever