The marketing manager projects a 20% increase in unit volume sales this year with a 10% increase.
Please be careful when copying problems... 10% increase of what? It's only from looking at your work I figured this out. (If you'd messed it all up, I might not have.)
1.projection for unit and volume
.20x3000=600
.10x50=5
All your calculations for this first one are correct. However, are these 4 steps just steps you chose to do? Or are you required to give the
answers to these steps? If you need to give the answers, note that this first step is giving you the
increases, not the actual final projected numbers.
There's also a short-cut for this. 3000 x .20 only gives you the 20% increase. If you do 3000 x 1.20 (120%), then that includes the original 3000 in the calculation and gives you the final answer of 3600 as the new volume.
question 2
Delsing plumbing company has beginning inventory of 14,000 units, will sell 50,000 units for the month,and desires to reduce ending inventory to 40% of beginning inventory.How many units should Delsing produce?
Beginning inventory 14,000
Will sale 50,000 unit in a month
1. Beginning inventory+ projected sales
14,000+50,000
=64,000
2. Subtract beginning inventory
64,000-14,000=50,000
3.multiple beginning and percentage
14,000x40%=5600 to produce
Always think about the logic of your answers. You're estimating sales of 50,000 units with only 14,000 in beginning inventory. Do you think producing only 5600 is going to be sufficient? You can't always know if your exact number is correct, but if you think about what you're doing, you can at least know when something is big-time off like this. You have to stop and think about whether your answer makes any sense.
Let's work this back out, as a check:
You have 14,000 units and you produce 5600. You now have 19,600. And you're going to sell 50,000... might as well stop there cause that's impossible.
The difficulty started in step #1. Think about it. Also look at #3. The problem says they desire to reduce
ending inventory to 40% of beginning inventory. And yet when you took 40% of beginning inventory, you chose that as the amount
to produce. That isn't what the problem says. Read carefully, phrase by phrase to see what they're saying.
1. newest unit on top
850 units price=16 per unit
600 units price=19 per unit
I'd say it's a bad habit to put the newest ones on top. If you ever have to do a long perpertual one of these, that could cause some confusion. Good idea to keep them in order. In fact, it did cause you confusion, cause you put the number of units with newest on top, and then put the costs with oldest on top, so that they're not even matched up correctly. Better just to keep them all in order, regardless of method, to keep consistent about it. That's not a "rule" - just a suggestion.
2.Find number of units sold from inventory
multiple price paid for recent unite by number of units sold
(850x19)=16150
(600x16)=9600
It says find the units sold. You've just sold 1450 from this calculation when it says you sold 1100.
This is a common problem I see. People don't want to
split up a purchase. As though those 600 units have to stay glued together for some reason. No they don't. You got 600 units all at the same time - they're only separated out because they're at a different cost. You sold 1100. You're starting with the last in, the 850 group, so all those got sold. But
how many more do you need in order to reach the 1100 sold? You didn't sell all 600 of them.
3. subtract 16150-9600= 655
Two things wrong here:
1) 16150-9600 doesn't equal 655. Always think about the logic of your answers. It doesn't make sense to have 16 thousand of something, subtract approximately 10 thousand, and end up with only 600 of them, does it? I'm sure you just popped something into the calculator wrong, but if you're paying attention, you should "feel" that something is wrong here. (In other words, stop just plugging n chugging, and start thinking. I blame this partly on the schools, cause they teach plug n chug.)
2) If you subtract the 9600 (which was all 600 units) from the 16150 (which was all 850 units), then you're right back at just the 850 units. Because you just took the entire 600 away. If you were going to just subtract back out the entire group of 600, why bother having figured it out to begin with?
As you can see, I'm into thinking, not plug n chug,
because it doesn't work in the long run. Think about all this and see what you can correct. If you try to think about what you're doing and what it means, you can better apply it to other problems.