 |
|
|
 |
New Member
|
|
May 26, 2009, 03:07 PM
|
|
Statute of limitations on C Card in Alabama
Being sued in Alabama for old C Card debt and last time I pay on it was 5/10/06 and they sued me on 5/15/09 3 year statule of limitations as you can see 5 days late am I right on the staute of limitations thanks I have my old bills to prove it
5/10/06 was the last payment posted on the C card statement and 5/15/09 they file the lawsuit thanks
Need help need to know if the statute of limitations has run out last payment made was posted on 5/10/06 [ C- card statement ] on 5/15/09 when they file the lawsuit I live in Alabama I think sol is 3 years on C-card again 5 days is my question or will the judge overlook the 5 days am I right about the SOL this is a debt buyer who is sueing me. Thanks for any and all help
 Originally Posted by AK lawyer
You mailed it on 5/10/06? Or they "posted" the transaction (credited it toward the debt) on that date?
If it's the latter, you have a good shot at the 3-year SOL.
It was posted the transaction on 5/10/06 credited it toward the debt not mail on 5/10/06 is a C-card is that a open account? Thanks
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
May 26, 2009, 07:10 PM
|
|
You say they sued you on 5/15 ?
Was this the date they filed or the court date.
Last time you paid 5/10, was that your check date or the date it posted to the account
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
May 27, 2009, 07:34 AM
|
|
SOL in Alabama is 3 years for "open accounts." However, this may fall under "contracts" as you are required to sign to use the card. Contracts in Alabama have a SOL of 6 years, not 3. I don't think you're going to get out of this one by using SOL as a defense.
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
May 27, 2009, 06:09 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by johnfowler1966
... last payment made was posted on 5/10/06 [ C- card statement ] on 5/15/09 when they file the lawsuit ...
You mailed it on 5/10/06? Or they "posted" the transaction (credited it toward the debt) on that date?
If it's the latter, you have a good shot at the 3-year SOL.
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
May 27, 2009, 07:11 PM
|
|
It is suggested in this thread that it's a 6-year contract SOL. However in that case the plaintiff will have to prove the contract. In my experience, credit cards haven't kept very good records and cannot produce the original signed documents, particularly when they have assigned the claim to a collection agency.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
May 28, 2009, 08:58 AM
|
|
I've asked that your thread be merged. Please don't start new threads regarding the same topic. If you have additional questions, you can continue to post them in your original question.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
May 28, 2009, 10:17 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by AK lawyer
It is suggested in this thread that it's a 6-year contract SOL. However in that case the plaintiff will have to prove the contract. In my experience, credit cards haven't kept very good records and cannot produce the original signed documents, particularly when they have assigned the claim to a collection agency.
My research indicates the statute is 3 years on credit card debt in Alabama.
If the last payment was posted on 5/10/06 the Statute ran out on 5/10/09 - and, no, the Judge cannot overlook the 5 days. The Statute has run.
BUT the date the lawsuit was filed is the important date, not the date the Attorney put on it or the date it was served. What is the date it was filed - what does the Court stamp say?
More importantly - you view credit card debt as contract law?
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
May 28, 2009, 10:25 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by JudyKayTee
My research indicates the statute is 3 years on credit card debt in Alabama.
If the last payment was posted on 5/10/06 the Statute ran out on 5/10/09 - and, no, the Judge cannot overlook the 5 days. The Statute has run.
BUT the date the lawsuit was filed is the important date, not the date the Attorney put on it or the date it was served. What is the date it was filed - what does the Court stamp say?
This is what I was reading, Judy:
Alabama Statutes of Limitations
I assumed credit card debt would be considered a contract, as you have to sign for it..
And as you pointed out, it matters when it was filed, not when the OP was served - I can't imagine a company, who does this for a living, letting an account slip away by only a five day difference. But there's a first time for everything.
|
|
 |
Expert
|
|
May 28, 2009, 11:12 AM
|
|
Please do not do two threads for the same issue, I have merged them the best I could, sorry if the merge causes any confusion
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
May 28, 2009, 11:27 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by this8384
This is what I was reading, Judy:
Alabama Statutes of Limitations
I assumed credit card debt would be considered a contract, as you have to sign for it...?
And as you pointed out, it matters when it was filed, not when the OP was served - I can't imagine a company, who does this for a living, letting an account slip away by only a six day difference. But there's a first time for everything.
The sort of rule of thumb - and note I said sort of - is that open ended accounts, such as charges, have a balance which fluctuates up and down and, therefore, payments which fluctuate. A contract is for a fixed amount with fixed payments.
|
|
 |
Ultra Member
|
|
May 28, 2009, 11:32 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by JudyKayTee
The sort of rule of thumb - and note I said sort of - is that open ended accounts, such as charges, have a balance which fluctuates up and down and, therefore, payments which fluctuate. A contract is for a fixed amount with fixed payments.
And that could be part of the confusion. Maybe the creditor thinks the way I do, while the judge may think they way you do :)
|
|
 |
New Member
|
|
May 28, 2009, 12:19 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by JudyKayTee
My research indicates the statute is 3 years on credit card debt in Alabama.
If the last payment was posted on 5/10/06 the Statute ran out on 5/10/09 - and, no, the Judge cannot overlook the 5 days. The Statute has run.
BUT the date the lawsuit was filed is the important date, not the date the Attorney put on it or the date it was served. What is the date it was filed - what does the Court stamp say?
Court stamp 5/15/09
|
|
 |
New Member
|
|
May 28, 2009, 12:28 PM
|
|
 Originally Posted by JudyKayTee
My research indicates the statute is 3 years on credit card debt in Alabama.
If the last payment was posted on 5/10/06 the Statute ran out on 5/10/09 - and, no, the Judge cannot overlook the 5 days. The Statute has run.
BUT the date the lawsuit was filed is the important date, not the date the Attorney put on it or the date it was served. What is the date it was filed - what does the Court stamp say?
Court stamp 5/15/09 thanks
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
May 28, 2009, 12:30 PM
|
|
If things are as you say, the debt is out of statute.
|
|
 |
New Member
|
|
Jun 20, 2010, 09:12 AM
|
|
Question: When Does the Statute of Limitations Clock Start?
Question: When Does the Statute of Limitations Clock Start?
Does The statute of limitations clock starts running on the date of last activity on your account. Is this Typically this is the date that I made last payment, or is it sometime else {credit card} lets said last payment made and posted on credit card statement was 5/10/06 and next payment was due 0n 6/10/06 and wasn't made,no more payment was made after that. Thanks for all and any help
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
Jun 23, 2010, 12:12 PM
|
|
It's the last activity on the account - in this case, the last posted payment. I've seen an argument made that it's the mailing date - but that argument lost.
|
|
 |
New Member
|
|
Jun 23, 2010, 12:31 PM
|
|
Thanks john
|
|
 |
New Member
|
|
Jun 23, 2010, 04:32 PM
|
|
Can a debt collector report on a credit report that the wrong date was open
Can a debt collector report on a credit report that wrong date was open on a old debt let said original debt was open on 8/01/05 and debt collector {unifund} report that it is 2/1/08 on the credit report this is on a credit card does this need to be the same date as the original debt. Both account # is the same. This is the time that they must have bought this debt. Thanks for all and any help.
|
|
 |
New Member
|
|
Jun 24, 2010, 11:12 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by this8384
Your post is somewhat confusing, but this is my best guess:
You opened a credit card in 2005 and defaulted on the payments.
The credit card company sold the debt to a collection agency, probably in 2008, so the agency is listing their open date as 2008.
You want to know if this is legal....correct?
My answer would be yes; they are listing the date that they obtained the account from the original creditor.
Where are you located? Statute of limitations may have expired on this debt already, depending on your local laws. When was the last payment you made, or when was the last time you used the account?
EDIT: After reading your other threads, is this related to the same creditor you've been asking about since last year?
Yes it is thanks
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Statute of limitations for credit card debt
[ 11 Answers ]
I have been reading some of the threads about this and I am more confused than ever. I spoke with the consumer affairs people at the government, and she told me that IF you do make payments re a very old debt ,they can put the debt back on your credit report, but since the debt was very old (1998)...
Statute of Limitations in Alabama
[ 3 Answers ]
My cousin gave me 700 in 2000 to help with medical problems with my brother. She is saying now that it was a loan and wants it back. I never signed anything. How long is the statute of limitation in Alabama if she takes me to court on a personal loan.
Credit Card Statute of Limitations
[ 2 Answers ]
I have recently been sued by a collection agency attorney. Mann-Bracken. The credit card that this suit is for is showing on my TransUnion credit report as Date Closed: 3/2003 with a remark, Closed by consumer. I live in Pennsylvania where the statute of limitations on this type of debt is 4...
Statute of Limitations on Credit Card Debt
[ 1 Answers ]
I paid off a credit card in 2000 after it had been deactivated. A couple of months ago, I started receiving calls from a collection agency about that card. I requested the provide me with information about the account and received nothing. They are now threatening me with small claims court. I have...
View more questions
Search
|