 |
|
|
 |
New Member
|
|
May 20, 2009, 09:12 PM
|
|
Unenforceable contract
I have a scenario. There is a contract between three persons. The contract between two persons was founf unenforceable due to breach of fiduciary duty. Will the contract survive as to the third person who did not have any fiduciary duty. What are his rights and duties.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
May 21, 2009, 06:17 AM
|
|
Hello:
It would help if you would spell out your situation in detail.
excon
|
|
 |
New Member
|
|
May 21, 2009, 07:47 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by excon
Hello:
It would help if you would spell out your situation in detail.
excon
Okay. Bill and Ray entered into a contract with Sam to market his products. It was found that Bill had a fiduciary duty towards Sam and he breached the fiduciary Duty. So Sam says the contract is unenforceable.So what about Ray who did not have any fiduciary duty towards Sam.Is the contract enforceable as to Ray and whether he is to get damages for the breach.My question is once a contract is found unenforceable is it unenforceable as to the whole contracting parties or whether there is some redress for the party not at fault.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
May 21, 2009, 07:55 AM
|
|
Hello u:
I wanted MORE detail, but I'll have to deal with what you gave me.
It would seem that the relationship between the contractees is NOT UN related. Therefore, if the relationship failed between TWO of the participants, it would be hard for me to believe that the remaining relationship is not also negatively effected.
Therefore, I would say the entire contract is unenforceable.
excon
|
|
 |
New Member
|
|
May 21, 2009, 09:42 AM
|
|
Here the fiduciary duty is between Aand Cwhereas B is not having any duty towards C.Aand B are not parteners but friends.My question is whether B is entitltled to damages for breach by C. C can claim breach of fiduciary duty against A and hence Acannot claim damages for breach
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
May 21, 2009, 09:47 AM
|
|
Hello again, u:
That's a different question. I don't know. Anybody can sue anybody else for anything they want. Proving it is another matter. See a lawyer.
excon
|
|
 |
Computer Expert and Renaissance Man
|
|
May 21, 2009, 09:52 AM
|
|
If the contract was between A & B as an entity with C, then B is out of luck. Whether they were in a legal partnership or an informal one, they agreed together to market Sam's products. If Sam made a separate agreement with A & B even though it was a single contract, then B has a case.
|
|
 |
Uber Member
|
|
May 21, 2009, 11:28 AM
|
|
 Originally Posted by unnieric
Okay. Bill and Ray entered into a contract with Sam to market his products. It was found that Bill had a fiduciary duty towards Sam and he breached the fiduciary Duty. So Sam says the contract is unenforceable.So what about Ray who did not have any fiduciary duty towards Sam.Is the contract enforceable as to Ray and whether he is to get damages for the breach.My question is once a contract is found unenforceable is it unenforceable as to the whole contracting parties or whether there is some redress for the party not at fault.
Why would Bill believe what Sam says instead of getting a (paid) legal opinion?
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Contract lawnotice of intent not to renew contract for services
[ 1 Answers ]
Are notices of intent not to renew enforceable in California, and if so, is there a limit on the damages assessed (liquidated damages)?
Does the consumer legal remedies act apply to small business customers in California, or only "consumers" for personal use?
I contracted for 3 years for...
View more questions
Search
|