|
|
|
|
New Member
|
|
Apr 28, 2009, 12:51 PM
|
|
Trigonometric Equation
I am having trouble with the following trigonometry problem:
cos2x= -1/2
I tried to turn cos2x into 2cos^2x-1 according to the double angle identity, but then I was unable to factor the problem. Where have I gone wrong, or where do I go from here?
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Apr 28, 2009, 02:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Apr 29, 2009, 08:16 AM
|
|
My math tell me that
x= 60 and 120 degrees... for 0 < x < 360
BUT if you do through identity, x = 30, 60, 120 and 150 for 0 < x < 360
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Apr 29, 2009, 08:24 AM
|
|
Originally Posted by Unknown008
My math tell me that
x= 60 and 120 degrees... for 0 < x < 360
and if you do through identity, x = 30, 60, 120 and 150 for 0 < x < 360
I'm confused. Cos(60) = 0.5, not -0.5. You need to be in the 2nd or 3rd quadrant for it to be -0.5. So 2x = ±120 (or 240), x=±60 on 0 < x < 360. Oh. I guess that does give x=120 also. My bad. 30 degrees and 150 degrees certainly don't fit the original problem, however.
|
|
|
New Member
|
|
Apr 29, 2009, 09:31 AM
|
|
Perito, when I turned in my homework, I found cos x= 1/2 without the identity as you worked it and then I found my solution set, but I got it wrong.
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Apr 29, 2009, 10:05 AM
|
|
Hmmm. :mad: What answer was said to be the correct one?
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Apr 29, 2009, 10:13 AM
|
|
Originally Posted by Perito
I'm confused. cos(60) = 0.5, not -0.5. You need to be in the 2nd or 3rd quadrant for it to be -0.5. So 2x = ±120 (or 240), x=±60 on 0 < x < 360. Oh. I guess that does give x=120 also. My bad. 30 degrees and 150 degrees certainly don't fit the original problem, however.
Yes,
cos(60)=0.5
but
cos(2x60)=-0.5
From cos(2x)=-0.5
And the plus/minus sign for cos(2x)=±0.5 (for the cos^2(x) = 0.25)
will give the roots in all four quadrants, so
2x = 60, 120, 240, 300
x = 30, 60, 120, 150
:confused:
|
|
|
Ultra Member
|
|
Apr 29, 2009, 10:17 AM
|
|
Originally Posted by Unknown008
And the plus/minus sign for cos(2x)=±0.5 (for the cos^2(x) = 0.25)
will give the roots in all four quadrants, so
2x = 60, 120, 240, 300
x = 30, 60, 120, 150
I'm having a tough time with the ±0.5. The original problem only said -0.5. If you go through the trig identity, you get ±0.5, but +5 doesn't fit the original problem so you have to discard it. Let me know where I'm going wrong. :(
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Apr 29, 2009, 10:40 AM
|
|
Yeah, I know that those do not fit in the original question... :o was just posting just in case there was a need for passing through trig identity.
Ok, edited my first post in the thread...
|
|
|
Uber Member
|
|
Apr 29, 2009, 11:28 AM
|
|
Perito agrees: Good. I wonder why they marked her wrong.
Or was it in rads? Then the answers would be
or
1.05 , 2.09
|
|
Question Tools |
Search this Question |
|
|
Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Making a word equation out of a symbol equation
[ 2 Answers ]
Hey,
I'm new here.
I don't understand this thing with the word equation so well. I wondered if anybody could tell me if this is correct:
CH4+3 O2 -> CO2+2 H2O (CH4=methane)
my answer (the word equation):
one methane atom (?) reacts with three oxygen molecules (?) to give one carbon...
Trigonometric Equation
[ 1 Answers ]
Why is it if you entered in the calculator 2 in second function of sine, it's answer was error?Is it the same for cosine=2 and tangent=2?
View more questions
Search
|