Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    needtoknownow's Avatar
    needtoknownow Posts: 1, Reputation: 1
    New Member
     
    #1

    May 12, 2008, 11:09 AM
    Broker's failure to provide lead paint disclosure to buyer
    I recently purchased a house that was built pre-1950 and my broker did not provide lead paint disclosure information to me. When I went to list the house for rent, I was provided this information so had the house tested and found out there was lead paint present. Do I have any recourse against the broker.

    The seller paid $500 at closing rather than provide the property condition disclosure form.

    To be clear, I am asking about any action I could have against the broker for failure to provide disclosures required in NYS.
    progunr's Avatar
    progunr Posts: 1,971, Reputation: 288
    Ultra Member
     
    #2

    May 12, 2008, 11:15 AM
    Sounds like you accepted an "as is" sale on this property?

    If this was a required legal form, and she could avoid it by paying $500 of the closing costs, I'm not sure you have any recourse.

    If the payment of $500 in no way over-rides this legal requirement, then you could prevail.

    I would consult with an attorney, most will give you a free initial consultation.
    froggy7's Avatar
    froggy7 Posts: 1,801, Reputation: 242
    Ultra Member
     
    #3

    May 12, 2008, 01:08 PM
    I also think that the OP may not fully understand what the "lead paint disclosure" is. If it's anything like what I have gotten in Texas and California, all it says is that the building was built before 1978, and that there "may" be lead paint present. If you want to know for sure, you will need to have a professional test for it. And if it is present, you can do X, Y, and Z.

    Now, when I went to sell my house in Texas, I was told I could pay the $500 fee, which would get me out of having to do any disclosures, but would make the house more difficult to sell. If it was clearly disclosed that the seller had done that, then I think that the broker did not do anything wrong in this case.

    Also, if I were purchasing a house built pre-1950, my assumption would be that it had lead paint in it somewhere. Probably covered up by several other layers of paint, but one of those layers would have lead. What you do with that assumption is up to you, and depends on your ultimate goal in buying the place.

    So... would knowing that it was possible that the spot had lead paint have changed your decision on buying the place? If not, then not having the disclosure is really meaningless.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Seller failure to disclose - buyer has proof [ 4 Answers ]

After we bought the house last November we found several problems with the house and we have proof ( one written, other verbal) that he knew about the following things: - previous termite infestations - his disclosure said there were none. We found the termite letter HE got when he bought the...

Lead Based Paint Disclosure [ 3 Answers ]

"Many houses and apartments built before 1978 have paint that contains lead (called lead-based paint). Lead from paint, chips, and dust can pose serious health hazards if not taken care of properly. Federal law requires that individuals receive certain information before renting or buying a...

Debt buyer refuses to provide information [ 5 Answers ]

I am being sued by a debt buyer who claims they have bought a loan they say I defaulted on. I filed a motion to dismiss but the debt buyer's attorney has filed a motion to strike my dismissal stating that; "As a matter of law may not question either the validity of the loan assignment or the...

Lead Based Paint Disclosure [ 3 Answers ]

I am selling a 75 y/o derelict house to a real estate company "as is". I faxed them a LEAD BASED PAINT DISCLOSURE filled out and signed by me. I faxed them a LEAD BASED PAINT pamphlet. They have not signed or returned the DISCLOSURE. Is it necessary that I go through the LEAD BASED PAINT...

Non-disclosure of lead exposure in lease [ 15 Answers ]

I signed a 1 year lease six months ago (MN) and there are two boxes on the lease. One says to check here if the building was built prior to 1978. The other says to see attached information sheet for additional information. Neither box was checked. The boxes are there in order for the landlord...


View more questions Search