Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    O_Troubles's Avatar
    O_Troubles Posts: 313, Reputation: 20
    Full Member
     
    #1

    Mar 19, 2008, 11:33 AM
    Illegal no running water
    I don't know if this is the right place to ask this sorry if its not. My question is if I'm renting an apt and the water gets shut off does that count as an unlivable condition? Like do rental agreements say that they HAVE to provide running water? Is it possible to make the management company pay some sort of compensation or anything. The whole building has no water. Its unsaitary can't flush, can't wash hands, difficult to cook, can't shower...
    addysonsmom's Avatar
    addysonsmom Posts: 14, Reputation: 0
    New Member
     
    #2

    Mar 19, 2008, 11:35 AM
    This is very illegal and they are required to IMMEDIATELY get the problem fixed. If the situation is not resolved within 24 hours... then you should turn the management company in.
    topladyj's Avatar
    topladyj Posts: 323, Reputation: 13
    Full Member
     
    #3

    Mar 19, 2008, 11:38 AM
    I am sure it is in your lease. If you move into a apt that gives you water and trash service then you better have the water and trash service. Did they say it was going to be shut off for any time length? Hope you get it back Good Luck!
    O_Troubles's Avatar
    O_Troubles Posts: 313, Reputation: 20
    Full Member
     
    #4

    Mar 19, 2008, 12:02 PM
    The water is turned off due to a water main break though so the citi has to fix it but in the mean time could I ask for compensation for the days with out running water or what?
    addysonsmom's Avatar
    addysonsmom Posts: 14, Reputation: 0
    New Member
     
    #5

    Mar 19, 2008, 12:08 PM
    Yes, I would ask for compensation... if a water mane broke then you should be compensated in some way
    ballengerb1's Avatar
    ballengerb1 Posts: 27,378, Reputation: 2280
    Home Repair & Remodeling Expert
     
    #6

    Mar 19, 2008, 12:23 PM
    Your landlord has no responsbility if it is the city water that failed, he has done nothing wrong and he has not voilated your lease. If you think you are entitled to compensation it would be the city you are up againist and I don't believe the city loses many of these claims.
    ScottGem's Avatar
    ScottGem Posts: 64,966, Reputation: 6056
    Computer Expert and Renaissance Man
     
    #7

    Mar 19, 2008, 12:27 PM
    Ball is right. This is not the landlord's fault. You would have to file suit against the city and/or the water authority that maintains the main. Going 24 hours without fresh water is not that big a hardship. So you might not have a case for compensation. Maybe if you went out and bought a few gallons of bottled water you can get reimbursed.
    O_Troubles's Avatar
    O_Troubles Posts: 313, Reputation: 20
    Full Member
     
    #8

    Mar 19, 2008, 11:21 PM
    Is it not the landlords or management companys obligation to provide a water tank outside hooked up to the building? I mean it was unsanitary and according to local laws it was considered an unlivable condition. So if I can't take a shower wash my hands or touch anyfood I want to cook (cuz I can't wash my hands after touching raw food) I mean I'm sure I don't have to take that inconvience sitting down. I'm outraged something more wasn't done! And scottgem you try going two days without water seriously. You can't flush wash your hands shower your limited in what you can cook don't brush your teeth...
    ScottGem's Avatar
    ScottGem Posts: 64,966, Reputation: 6056
    Computer Expert and Renaissance Man
     
    #9

    Mar 20, 2008, 05:58 AM
    I'm not saying its easy, but its not illegal and its not the landlord's fault. I know of no place that requires a separate water storage tank for apartments just for emergencies. When NYC had its massive blackout back in the 60s, the building I was in didn't have water because the pumps to get the water to the upper floors didn't have power. I remember walking down 10 flights and filling up containers at a fire hydrant. In those days bottled water wasn't as prevalent as it is today.

    I'm sorry, but certain inconveniences DO have to be taken sitting down. As I said, you might have a cause of action against the utility that maintains the main, but not against the landlords.
    JudyKayTee's Avatar
    JudyKayTee Posts: 46,503, Reputation: 4600
    Uber Member
     
    #10

    Mar 20, 2008, 06:36 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by addysonsmom
    Yes, I would ask for compensation....if a water mane broke then you should be compensated in some way

    Absolutely not correct - this is not the landlord's "fault" and if this were true every time there was a power failure everyone would sue everyone else.
    addysonsmom's Avatar
    addysonsmom Posts: 14, Reputation: 0
    New Member
     
    #11

    Mar 20, 2008, 06:46 AM
    If you have been living without water for more than 2 days... you can't flush the toilet, wash your hands after handling meat, take a shower, etc... then yes... you definitely SHOULD ask the city for compensation. I am by no means a "sue happy" person... but lets be reasonable here... this is causing disgusting conditions. Seriously... c'mon people... and it can never hurt to ASK for compensation.
    JudyKayTee's Avatar
    JudyKayTee Posts: 46,503, Reputation: 4600
    Uber Member
     
    #12

    Mar 20, 2008, 06:53 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by addysonsmom
    If you have been living without water for more than 2 days....you can't flush the toilet, wash your hands after handling meat, take a shower, etc...then yes...you definitely SHOULD ask the city for compensation. I am by no means a "sue happy" person....but lets be reasonable here....this is causing disgusting conditions. Seriously...c'mon people....and it can never hurt to ASK for compensation.

    I'll be even more reasonable - there is no such action against the City, no such Statute, no such lawsuit. Sure, it doesn't hurt to "ask" for compensation but you are dealing with a Government agency. You don't just call on the phone. You file a Notice of Claim and see where that goes - which will be nowhere.

    "Disgusting" is not legal grounds. Hard to hear but it's not.
    ballengerb1's Avatar
    ballengerb1 Posts: 27,378, Reputation: 2280
    Home Repair & Remodeling Expert
     
    #13

    Mar 20, 2008, 08:36 AM
    All good and correct replies. From what you have told us there is no hint of inappropriate conduct or negligence on anyone's part, including the landlord. This situation could not have been prevented under ordinary circumstances. I would agree that you are in a tough spot but who caused it to happen? This is where the Act of God clause kick in. Sorry and hope by now the water is running.
    JudyKayTee's Avatar
    JudyKayTee Posts: 46,503, Reputation: 4600
    Uber Member
     
    #14

    Mar 20, 2008, 08:44 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by O_Troubles
    is it not the landlords or managment companys obligation to provide a water tank outside hooked up to the building? i mean it was unsanitary and acording to local laws it was concidered an unlivable condition. so if i can't take a shower wash my hands or touch anyfood i wanna cook (cuz i can't wash my hands after touching raw food) i mean im sure i dont have to take that inconvience sitting down. im outraged something more wasnt done! and scottgem you try going two days without water seriously. you can't flush wash your hands shower your limited in what you can cook dont brush your teeth...


    You've posted the same question on two different boards and keep getting the same answers.

    You think you are right and everyone is wrong so file a claim against the City and your landlord and let us know how it works out. If I'm wrong I'll be the first to apologize.
    twinkiedooter's Avatar
    twinkiedooter Posts: 12,172, Reputation: 1054
    Uber Member
     
    #15

    Mar 20, 2008, 08:56 AM
    You can call up the Red Cross or the health dept and ask them to provide some emergency water and/or emergency portapottys for your building since you have no running water. I had the Red Cross provide the 100 homes where I live when the private water pump went out for the whole community. They delivered a lot of bottled water for drinking and had 6 portapottys for the neighborhood. You can't sue the city regardless.
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #16

    Mar 20, 2008, 08:59 AM
    Hello O:

    I agree with you. You can't live there. If you can, I'd rent a motel until the problem gets fixed. Certainly, ain't nobody going to be fronting funds for you to do that. That just don't happen.

    Afterwards, you can file suit against the city and your landlord. As the others have said, unless the landlord DID anything to the water line to cause it to break, the judge will probably let your landlord off.

    But, you might win against the city.

    excon
    luvmylab's Avatar
    luvmylab Posts: 90, Reputation: 7
    Junior Member
     
    #17

    Mar 20, 2008, 09:34 AM
    I agree with everyone, it's not the landlord's fault. However the landlord may want to compensate a good tenant just too smooth thing. The landlord does not have to do anything but I've found that management companies are usually willing to offer something if you ask or tell them you are unhappy. They want you to renew your lease, so that means that want to make you happy. It doesn't hurt to ask but don’t expect anything.
    ScottGem's Avatar
    ScottGem Posts: 64,966, Reputation: 6056
    Computer Expert and Renaissance Man
     
    #18

    Mar 20, 2008, 09:43 AM
    Ok so water is back on, after what, 24 hours? 48 hours? Ok so what you want compensation. What losses did you incur? What do you want compensation for? Did you have to eat out because you couldn't cook? Did you stay in a hotel?

    Your next step is to quantify what losses you incurred due to the water being shut off. You can then use that to file a claim against the city and the utility.

    Good luck!
    JudyKayTee's Avatar
    JudyKayTee Posts: 46,503, Reputation: 4600
    Uber Member
     
    #19

    Mar 20, 2008, 09:57 AM
    The OP is in Canada and I can't find any info there but I find this or a similar Statute on the books in many Cities (mine is one of them!).

    When my power was out for 9 days in 1996 I lost the total contents of the basement because the sump pump was not working and my Attorney sent the local Statute to me - I had no case.

    Anyway, one of the Statutes reads: "We realize that citizens may incur expenses and damages because of a sewer backup or flood of water from a water main break. The City regrets those events and strives to prevent them. However, the operation of a water/sewer system is a governmental function, for which the City is immune from damages unless immunity is waived by state law. In a case decided in early 2004, the Texas Supreme Court clearly outlined the narrow circumstances in which a City might be liable for a utility failure that damages a home. City of Dallas v. Jennings, 142 SW3d 310 (Tex. 2004). Under current law, in the vast majority of situations, the City of Amarillo is immune from liability for property damages caused by sewer back-up or water main breakage."

    Will be waiting to see how this plays out, what the City says, if a lawsuit is filed.
    froggy7's Avatar
    froggy7 Posts: 1,801, Reputation: 242
    Ultra Member
     
    #20

    Mar 20, 2008, 09:20 PM
    I sometimes wonder what people like the OP do when they buy a house, and suddenly find out that they have to fix all these kinds of issues themselves. I'll admit, it was a bit of a shock when I had my pipe leak in my first home's wall, and suddenly realized it was entirely up to me to figure out what I was going to do to fix the problem. Call a plumber was the first thing I could think of, and thankfully it was a small leak and that worked. But it drove home to me that sometimes stuff just happens, and you just have to deal with it when it does.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Constant running water noise, old water softener pipes? [ 3 Answers ]

When we bought our house, it came with a decommissioned water softener in the laundry room. The pipes behind it (I'm assuming in and out) were capped off with plastic plugs that toggle back and forth. If you're familiar with Dr. Dolittle, I'd call it a pushmi-pullyu setup. (sorry, I'm an admin, not...

Running water sound in water pressure tank [ 1 Answers ]

Not sure if I have a bad bladder in my water pressure tank but here is what I have. When my submersible pump kicks on I hear what sounds like water and air mixing in the tank. The house pressure comes up to about 50 PSI and takes time to bleed down. Could I have air in the tank from the well...

No water running from Cold water Tap [ 2 Answers ]

I get water in my hot water tap but do not get water in cold water tap. I open the tap fully but not a drop. Any suggestions? Please help.

Bath tub shower spout & head running water running at same time [ 1 Answers ]

I started with a slight dripping problem(sayko system).i decided to replace all 3 stem assemblies together as they all were about 18 years old.after reassembling the new stems(danko brand),turned on the water supply & checked faucets.hot & cold worked fine but when the shower was turned on,water...

Vibrating (Banging) Water Pipes (Water Running) [ 2 Answers ]

When upstairs tub valve is opened for the first time in the evening, loud banging noise sometimes ensues from pipes. Banging is alleviated when supply is redirected to showerhead, or when water is turned off. Single-handle Pegasus (Home Depot) valve. No issues when supply is off (not "water...


View more questions Search