I personally believe that BSL is an idea that to the general public sounds good on paper, but is totally unrealistic. For example:
What exactly is a "Pit Bull"--does that include AmStaffs, Staffordshire Bull Terriers, American Bull Terriers, or any mixed breed that "kinda-sorta-looks-like-a-Pit Bull"? Where do you draw the line?
What do you consider a "dangerous" breed? I have owned Pit Bull mixes (one Pit Bull Rotweiller mix), German Shepherds and Dobermans, most with behavior issues, and never with a serious bite. The worst bite I ever received was from a Walker Coonhound. (not counting of course Chihuahuas, Yorkies, etc--they may bite more often but with less damage--if it doesn't require stitches or a tetanus shot I don't really consider it a bite.)
I would rather see dogs placed into groups suitable for beginner, intermediate and experienced owners, with a test required to advance beyond beginner. This wouldn't be practical either, but it makes more sense to me to direct legislation toward potential owners than the dogs.
|