[smoothy]

Hello again, smoothy:

You DO think it's gonna getcha, huh? Me? I have more faith in our Constitutional system than you do. Why oh why you think our Constitution will fall in the face of some extremists is beyond me. But, you think we're weak... Dude!

excon

You have more faith than I do... beween liberal activist judges and the fools on the 9th circuit court... they all think the constitution is open to interpretation when its actually written in clear english and specifically gives a means to amend it... via amendments and how many states have to approve...

NOT by a couple unelected judges with delusions of granduer.

THink I'm kidding, just look at the gun grabbers on the left trying to take away the 2nd amendment right from those of us with guns (like yourself as you have said before)... they will never get an amendment so they try to circumvent the constitution via judicial activists... luckily, they haven't goten their way very much.


Don't get me wrong ex... I do see what you are trying to say, the problem is the democrat party has corrupted that system so badly over the last 50 years with activist judges that don't know what it says that I can't truly trust them or their motives. If they can't pass a legislations they get judicials to rule from the bench improperly and illegally to get their way.

THe COnstitution ISN'T a living breathing Document, its VERY clear what it says... and any deviation from its clear language should be made ONLY via amendments ratified by the states... not by a political appointee or appointees.

[excon]

Hello again, smoothy:

I just don't see how activist judges are going to bring sharia law here. I can't make the connection... Hep me out.

excon

[smoothy]

Hello again, smoothy:

I just don't see how activist judges are gonna bring sharia law here. I can't make the connection... Hep me out.

excon

All they (The Supreme Court activists) have to do is rule that it can be allowed... and then its constitution be damned from that point. Because you can't have two sets of conflicting laws for two different groups. And most parts of SHARIA are blatantly unconstitutional if not outright illegal.

And it wouldn't be the first time they have done it. Its not a foreign concept... the Democrat party has relied on it for years. Incrimentally pushing things on the population the majority doesn't want... and that would never pass via amendment.

Its been done in the UK, France and other European Countries and they are waking up to it now...

After all, who do the Supreme court answer too? They aren't elected, and the only way you can get one out is bump them off unless they drop dead on their own or retire voluntarily. They aren't elected by the American people, and the American people really have no say about who get on it... and with Congress and the Senate with 11% approval rates who honestly thinks they are acting on anyone's behalf but their own for the most part. It's the Special Interests that line their pockets... and that's who they listen too. At least during non-election years... then they pretend to care.

Simple numbers... they need 75% of 50 states to ratify an amendment... but it only takes 5 unelected Supreme court activist Judges to throw out any part of the Constitution or law on the books.

[Catsmine]

I see it differently, Smoothy. I don't think Shari'a will be instituted here. I see it covering the Mediterranean as the Ottomans did, along with Asia
Minor and the Malaysian Archipelago, all ruled from Teh'ran and Riyadh. Then when surrounded Israel defends itself from a nuclear armed Hamas(or, as they will likely be termed, Iranian irregulars), the whole planet burns.

This is not paranoia, this is extrapolation. I really really hope I'm wrong.