[excon]

instead of leading others to believe things never said or even implied?

Hello again, Steve:

Well, of course, you don't like it when they bust down your door. THAT part of the Fourth Amendment you're cool with. But, when it comes to the surveillance state, all I've heard from you is (1) they're not listening to me, or (2) if they are, they're not interested.

That doesn't sound, to me, like you're too outraged about it - certainly not like you are about your front door. If I'm implying incorrectly, straighten me out.

excon

[speechlesstx]

The only thing I have defended that has you in a tizzy is monitoring possible terrorist communications originating from overseas. From that one thing you surmise I don't care about your rights - against all other evidence.

[excon]

From that one thing you surmise I don't care about your rights

Hello again, Steve:

Uh, huh!

excon

[speechlesstx]

Are you getting calls from terrorists overseas?

[talaniman]

What should we do about home grown terrorists??

[excon]

Are you getting calls from terrorists overseas?

Hello again, Steve:

Oh, I get it. You TRUST 'em! Doesn't sound very right wing of you... Oh yeah, that's right. These are the COP parts of government that gives you guys thrills up your legs.

excon

[NeedKarma]

Are you getting calls from terrorists overseas?

But the wiretaps have little to do with terrorism.

[speechlesstx]

What should we do about home grown terrorists???

Kill 'em all.

[speechlesstx]

But the wiretaps have little to do with terrorism.

Yeah, so? I addressed you both appropriately.

[speechlesstx]

Oh, I get it. You TRUST 'em!! Doesn't sound very right wing of you... Oh yeah, that's right. These are the COP parts of government that gives you guys thrills up your legs.

Again, try for a change being honest about my position instead of misleading others about it. I would imagine we both get thrills up our leg from the same thing(s) and that doesn't include cops or Obama. Unless maybe it's one hot lady cop.

[NeedKarma]

Yeah, so? I addressed you both appropriately.

Kill 'em all?

[speechlesstx]

Excuse me, [Sarc]Kill 'em all.[/Sarc]

Better?

[NeedKarma]

So that means don't kill them all? Why speak in parables?

[talaniman]

You have to find 'em first.

[NeedKarma]

You have to find 'em first.

That's why the US gov has to listen in on your phone conversations and your internet traffic.

[speechlesstx]

So that means don't kill them all? Why speak in parables?

That wasn't a parable, it was sarcasm.

[NeedKarma]

That wasn't a parable, it was sarcasm.

So you often choose sarcasm ("A form of wit that is marked by the use of sarcastic language and is intended to make its victim the butt of contempt or ridicule.") to communicate here. Why not speak to people with a minimum of respect like an adult?

[speechlesstx]

So you often choose sarcasm ("A form of wit that is marked by the use of sarcastic language and is intended to make its victim the butt of contempt or ridicule.") to communicate here. Why not speak to people with a minumum of respect like an adult?

Why do you ask me questions you should be asking yourself?

[NeedKarma]

Oh well, I tried.

[Wondergirl]

Oh well, I tried.

You may be the most trying person speechless knows. ;)